NATION

PASSWORD

Illegal SC proposals - post them here

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:38 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: liossalde_1352475252

Commend Communist International League
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.


Category: Commendation

Nominee: Communist International League

Proposed by: Liossalde

Description: SECURITY COUNCIL,

With all the respect,I want to introduce to you the COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE.

With exctended ideas,with the vision of equality and with strong bonds between its members,I request Your commendation for the recognisation of its offer.

With complete respect,
Liossalde

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 72 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

No operative clause and the use of 'you'.

User avatar
Skyrim Diplomacy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1497
Founded: Jun 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Skyrim Diplomacy » Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:49 am

Also, "I" multiple times.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:52 pm

Condemn Zebesian Space Pirates
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation

Nominee: Zebesian Space Pirates

Proposed by: Kelvaros Prime

Description: Recognizing the efforts put forth by Zebesian Space Pirates to condemn the World Alliance.

Further Noting that regions maintain security by withholding information from the general public.

Adding that regional founders, delegates, etc. do not always have to give nations a chance during regional defense.

Shocked that Zebesian Space Pirates would wish to use the World Assembly Security Council as a tool to strike revenge on the World Alliance.

Concludes that Zebesian Space Pirates is worthy of condemnation by the World Assembly Security Council.


Does anyone think this may be balancing on 2b? (I do bring up this question because I know full well that, when I attempted to condemn Quelesh for his choice of resolution, I had a lot of complaints directed at me for similar.)

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:08 am

How about rule 3..

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:52 am

Crazy girl wrote:How about rule 3..


And that too. Thanks, CG.

User avatar
Firstaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8409
Founded: Jun 29, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Firstaria » Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:48 am

Description: The Region conservadom has been unjust, and deceitful.

APPALLED at the mass ejection of many nations that simply asked an disliked question.

VEXED at the immature actions of both "Governor-General" and "Queen" of the region and their refusal to communicate with the outside world.

UNDERSTANDING that Conservadom is hypocritical at their claims of democracy despite no freedom of speech or elections

RECOGNIZING that the region populace remains stiffed and repressed by the harsh dictators

CONDEMNING Conservadom for it's actions.
Approvals: 7 (New-Zealand, Valorono, Dernham, Ascella, Ammar, Newtered States, Patricant)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 1 day 11 hours


Lack of subject should be illegal right. I mean, who condemns who here?
OVERLORD Daniel Mercury of Firstaria
Original Author of SC #5 and SC #30

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:48 pm

It's not necessary to preface a proposal with "The World Assembly/Security Council".

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryozerkia » Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:11 am

Look what Grays Harbor found in the General Assembly:

Grays Harbor wrote:
Condemnation of HR Violation
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Low-landers

Description: Recognizing that The Rogue Nation of Oppressed Slaves is a nation which lives under the regime of psychotic dictatorship and experiences constant violation of the basic human rights,

The General Assembly expresses solidarity with the suffering nation and:

Condemns the government of The Rogue Nation of Oppressed Slaves due to violations of human rights.

Encourages the government to implement human rights reforms.

Supports human rights activists and NGOs in the region of The Lowlands

Encourages members of the World Assembly to withdraw their diplomatic missions from The Rogue Nation of Oppressed Slaves and to implement trade embargo on all goods except food and medicine.


Two words ... WRONG PLACE. The SC is over that-a-way, bub. :palm:

Besides being in the wrong council, it violates Rule 3...
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Moronist Decisions » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:10 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: elvaeia_regnum_1353685687

Liberate NAZI EUROPE
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region


Category: Liberation

Nominee (region): NAZI EUROPE

Proposed by: Elvaeia Regnum

Description: The security council,
Noting that there are numerous Nazi, fascist and racist regions promoting these heinous and anti social ideals in our world,

DISGUSTED that these regions at the foremost the NAZI EUROPE region, which remains the most oppressive of these regions, and that despite many warnings from prominent nations such as Elvaeia Regnum, remains oppressive and socially evil as ever,

Hereby opens the gates of NAZI EUROPE immediately and other fascist, racist and nazi regions at the earliest.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 73 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days


Violates Rule 3 - no operative clause/operative clause goes beyond what a liberation resolution can do.
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:46 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: roarsome_1353768310

Repeal "Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal

Resolution: SC#33

Proposed by: Roarsome

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #33: Condemn Durkadurkiranistan II shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: That was a long time ago, Roarsome says forgive and forget.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 74 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour

No operative clause and violates 4(c).

User avatar
Captain Apollo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 143
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Captain Apollo » Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:37 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_peoples_of_northern_america_1353781905

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: NAZI EUROPE
Proposed by: The United Peoples of Northern America

I propose that we occupy NAZI Europe for a medium duration of time forcing them to pay 20% of their governments yearly income to us, the WA. This money is to be used properly in areas like helping third world nations. They are also to be stripped of arms owning and manufacturing rights. While occupying them we should restructure there shattered government in a mor perfect model of the WA's choosing. It will be chosen by a voting process. After a period of Tim I suggest we slowly downgrade our presence leaving only positive memories. We shall be tere to do good not enact revenge.

No operative clause and a whole slew of other rules broken.
Last edited by Captain Apollo on Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
United Federation of Canada
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1417
Founded: Oct 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby United Federation of Canada » Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:49 am

Captain Apollo wrote:
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_peoples_of_northern_america_1353781905

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: NAZI EUROPE
Proposed by: The United Peoples of Northern America

I propose that we occupy NAZI Europe for a medium duration of time forcing them to pay 20% of their governments yearly income to us, the WA. This money is to be used properly in areas like helping third world nations. They are also to be stripped of arms owning and manufacturing rights. While occupying them we should restructure there shattered government in a mor perfect model of the WA's choosing. It will be chosen by a voting process. After a period of Tim I suggest we slowly downgrade our presence leaving only positive memories. We shall be tere to do good not enact revenge.

No operative clause and a whole slew of other rules broken.


Not to mention terrible spelling, grammar and punctuation.

User avatar
The Great Destruction
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great Destruction » Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:45 pm

United Federation of Canada wrote:Not to mention terrible spelling, grammar and punctuation.


but those are not illegalities

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:59 am

The Great Destruction wrote:
United Federation of Canada wrote:Not to mention terrible spelling, grammar and punctuation.


but those are not illegalities


Blogginess, though, is. As is lack of operative clause. And exceeding what a liberation can do.

Have I got them in the wrong order?

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:09 am

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: cssr_1354035904

Liberate White Pride World Wide
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region.


Category: Liberation

Nominee (region): White Pride World Wide

Proposed by: CSSR

Description: For a long time White Pride World Wide has not let delegates have powers for an invasion that has to change.
We need to Let WA delegates have administration so it can be open to an invasion!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 75 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours

Rule 3 violation. Goes beyond what a liberation can do.

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:48 am

Condemn The Nazi Reich
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Nazi Reich
Proposed by: Synchen

Description: ACKNOWLEDGING that The nazi reich
is a region built on nazi principles, principles that re largely condemned by the world

REALIZING that if The nazi reich
supports the nazi philosophy then it also supports the hatred of jews and communists

SHOCKED at how The nazi reich
appears to worship Hitler, a leader who caused much pain and suffering worldwide

APPALLED at how The nazi reich
boasts of its sending "communists...to concentration camps"

HORRIFIED that The nazi reich
intends to oppress nazi philosophy on other regions in nation states

RECOGNIZES that The nazi reich
is therefore a threat to world security and should be stopped

HEREBY condemns The nazi reich


Mentions real-world people and ideologies without explaining how they apply to NS. Rule 4(d) for Hitler and Rule 4(e) for other mentions of Nazism.
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
X-x
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby X-x » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:41 pm

Condemn The Dourian Embassy
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.


Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Dourian Embassy
Proposed by: Mad Jack


Oppa Gangnam Style
Gangnam Style

Najeneun ttasaroun inganjeogin yeoja
Keopi hanjanui yeoyureul aneun pumgyeok inneun yeoja
Bami omyeon simjangi tteugeowojineun yeoja
Geureon banjeon inneun yeoja

Naneun sanai
Najeneun neomankeum ttasaroun geureon sanai
Keopi sikgido jeone wonsyat ttaerineun sanai
Bami omyeon simjangi teojyeobeorineun sanai
Geureon sanai

Areumdawo sarangseureowo
Geurae neo hey geurae baro neo hey

Areumdawo sarangseureowo
Geurae neo hey geurae baro neo hey

Jigeumbuteo gal dekkaji gabolkka

Oppa Gangnam Style
Gangnam Style

Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style
Gangnam Style

Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style

Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style

Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Eh-eh-eh, eh-eh-eh

Jeongsukhae boijiman nol ttaen noneun yeoja
Ittaeda sipeumyeon mukkeotdeon meori puneun yeoja
Garyeotjiman wenmanhan nochulboda yahan yeoja
Geureon gamgakjeogin yeoja

Naneun sanai
Jeomjanha boijiman nol ttaen noneun sanai
Ttaega doemyeon wanjeon michyeobeorineun sanai
Geunyukboda sasangi ultungbultunghan sanai
Geureon sanai

Areumdawo sarangseureowo
Geurae neo, hey, geurae baro neo, hey

Areumdawo sarangseureowo
Geurae neo, hey, geurae baro neo, hey

Jigeumbuteo gal dekkaji gabolkka

Oppa Gangnam Style
Gangnam Style

Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style
Gangnam Style

Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style

Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style

Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Eh-eh-eh, eh-eh-eh

Ttwineun nom geu wie naneun nom
Baby, baby
Naneun mwol jom aneun nom

Ttwineun nom geu wie naneun nom
Baby, baby
Naneun mwol jom aneun nom
You know what I'm saying

Oppa Gangnam Style
Eh-eh-eh, eh-eh-eh
Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Oppa Gangnam Style

Eh, sexy lady
Op, op, op, op
Eh-eh-eh, eh-eh-eh

Oppa Gangnam Style


Hereby Condemns The Dourian Embassy


Absolutely no argument. Could be considered plagerism, but...just...wow.
To be edited by You within seconds, to be edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:44 pm

X-x wrote:Absolutely no argument. Could be considered plagerism, but...just...wow.

Seems more plain spam. And violates most, if not all SC rules.

User avatar
X-x
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby X-x » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:47 pm

Jamie Anumia wrote:
X-x wrote:Absolutely no argument. Could be considered plagerism, but...just...wow.

Seems more plain spam. And violates most, if not all SC rules.


Yeah. I don't really want to list all of the ones it breaks, either. :meh:
To be edited by You within seconds, to be edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:47 pm

For sure it's not particularly wise for a sinker delegate to submit it.
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
The Dourian Embassy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1547
Founded: Nov 15, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dourian Embassy » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:49 pm

I don't see what's wrong with it.
Treize Dreizehn, President of Douria.

cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:02 pm

"Spamming the proposal queue" could be the most immediate rule violation. Or joke proposal.
It'd be common sense if site rules applied to WA proposals too, and that Condemnation looks spammy.

*shrugs*

Plagiarism, maybe? I mean, Mad Jack authored only a minuscule part of the resolution. :P
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:05 pm

I'm pretty sure it breaks Rule 3, 4 and Rule 4(d) at least.
Last edited by Jamie Anumia on Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mad Jack
Diplomat
 
Posts: 978
Founded: Nov 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad Jack » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:10 pm

Jamie Anumia wrote:I'm pretty sure it breaks Rule 3, 4 and Rule 4(d) at least.

It has an operative clause.

The operative clause also fulfills the spirit of Rule 4.

I don't see how 4(d) applies.
Where is Someone Special?
<@Unibot> I don't care about defender unity.

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:17 pm

A proposal can be in compliance with the Four Rules and still be illegal. :P
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads