by Superduperpoopernation » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:26 am
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:28 am
by Galloism » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:34 am
by Alaje » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:38 am
by Galloism » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:41 am
Alaje wrote:No, they should be discouraging sexual behavior in students.
by Souseiseki » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:41 am
Alaje wrote:No, they should be discouraging sexual behavior in students.
by Necrophilopolis » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:42 am
by Alaje » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:45 am
Souseiseki wrote:Alaje wrote:No, they should be discouraging sexual behavior in students.
kids fucking and getting pregnant because they have no sex ed or access to safe sex [ ]
kids fucking and not getting pregnant because they have sex ed and easy access to safe sex [ X ]
mark with an X
choose one (1) option
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:45 am
by Samuraikoku » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:46 am
by Necrophilopolis » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:47 am
by Zack Mattox » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:48 am
Alaje wrote:Souseiseki wrote:kids fucking and getting pregnant because they have no sex ed or access to safe sex [ ]
kids fucking and not getting pregnant because they have sex ed and easy access to safe sex [ X ]
mark with an X
choose one (1) option
I don't support encouraging students to have sex, and that is exactly what putting condoms in the schools would do. If they want condoms, they should buy them at a store.
by Aggicificicerous » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:48 am
Necrophilopolis wrote:Since it's taxpayer money the taxpayers should vote on it.
*You're also overlooking the economic-right argument as well
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:48 am
Raeyh wrote:High school students are underage and can not have sex legally. Providing condoms to people who are under the age of consent would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
by Hidustaaan » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:49 am
by Khadgar » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:49 am
Alaje wrote:Souseiseki wrote:kids fucking and getting pregnant because they have no sex ed or access to safe sex [ ]
kids fucking and not getting pregnant because they have sex ed and easy access to safe sex [ X ]
mark with an X
choose one (1) option
I don't support encouraging students to have sex, and that is exactly what putting condoms in the schools would do. If they want condoms, they should buy them at a store.
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the impact of the condom availability program in New York City public high schools by comparing rates of sexual activity and condom use for New York students and similar students in Chicago. METHODS: A total of 7119 students from 12 randomly selected New York schools and 5738 students from 10 Chicago schools participated in a cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: New York students, compared with Chicago students, reported equal rates of sexual activity but higher rates of condom use at last intercourse (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36). For higher-risk students (those with three or more sexual partners in the past 6 months), condom use was greater in New York (OR = 1.85) than in Chicago. CONCLUSIONS: Condom availability has a modest but significant effect on condom use and does not increase rates of sexual activity. These findings suggest that school-based condom availability can lower the risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases for urban teenagers in the United States.
by Melas » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ferelith, Foxyshire, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Inferior, Kannap, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Port Carverton
Advertisement