Cap and save

[Surote]

Description: The Purpose of this proposal is to cut carbon Describtion emissions by 17% by 2055 in order to slow down global warming and improve current countries enviroments.

Believeing That this will help economies and people everywhere in the long term

Funding for the proposal will come from a countries own funding (Like taxes and fees).

Noting it will also so drive the world into a new technological era of green technology



Noting That Global warming is happening right now and is a danger to every country.

Noting That it will cost industries money in the short term but with new efficent technolgy saves money in the long term.

Concluding That helping stop global warming is the greatest achievement mankind has done for itself.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 52 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat May 23 2009

[Rutianas]

Description: The Purpose of this proposal is to cut carbon Describtion emissions by 17% by 2055 in order to slow down global warming and improve current countries enviroments.

Our current year is 2395. How are we to meet this marker date? It's already passed.

Paula Jenner, Rutianas Ambassador

OOC: The point being that not everyone is on the same calendar system.

[Valipac]

Not every nation is located on earth, so not every nation may be experiencing global warming.

[Cobdenia]

And some are in the past, and thus don't need to worry about this for several decades, centuries or millenia...

[Goobergunchia]

I assume that this proposal would be submitted under the category "Environmental", with "All Businesses" affected?

Furthermore, your proposal is riddled with typographical errors that make it difficult to understand. Please redraft it for clarity and linguistic accuracy before submitting.

Susan Zafkoro
Legislative Assistant
Goobergunchian UN Embassy

[Bahgum]

Sir Albert says a quick thanks that this debate is not about his beloved flat cap, the tilte had him worried for a moment.

[I Eldalante]

The Eldalantean government wishes me to note, that despite our own contention that global warming is nothing more than a silly myth put forward by liberal persons who hate and abhor success and life, that the resolution as presented also fails to include any enacting or enabling clauses.

[Charlotte Ryberg]

This proposal cannot be supported by Ms. Sarah Harper because of era differences as well as the fact that there is little climate change going on in this country although we see recycling to be an important issue. However, when submitting proposals take your time to think which category it fits best.

[Bears Armed]

So the biggest polluters and the smallest polluters would have to cut their emissions by the same proportion? This would be unfair to those nations that already have relatively low emission rates.
OPPOSED.