Advertisement
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:31 am
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Meekinos » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:12 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:Refering to your proposal, is requiring nations to allow abortions in cases of maternal life, maternal health, rape, and fetal defects not dictating abortion law?
Virtually every WA resolution does that kind of thing, honoured ambassador. However, what is wrong now is you have gone into desperate measures in a vain attempt to keep this draft alive. The problem is that this draft is still tightly linked to your attempt to ban abortion after 24 weeks, to which many ambassadors have disagreed with, form my observation. You have even used RL examples as evidence rather than focusing on the actual implications of banning abortion.
Honoured ambassador, I regret to inform you that there is very little hope of saving this draft unless you really pay attention to the reality of banning abortion. For example: member states that believe that the concept for forced maternity is inappropriate, member states who promote family planning to improve welfare, and member states who face overpopulation issues and want to make abortion available to all for such reasons.
- Ms. S. Harper.
by Xanthal » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:31 pm
Teshuva wrote:Teshuva fully approves this resolution and it's spirit. We hope to be able to vote for it as soon as possible.
Regards,
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:03 pm
Xanthal wrote:I must give credit to the authors of this resolution, as it is perhaps the most thoughtfully-worded, intelligently-aimed legislation ever to come to the floor of the WA on this matter.
Xanthal wrote:However, it is the position of the Xanthalian government that the required extension of sentient rights to any being should be based on its present level of sentience, not past sentience or expectations of future sentience. While the Federation certainly does not begrudge other nations the right to extend these protections further, and abortion laws indeed vary by state within the Federation itself, sentience- not viability- is the sole minimum standard by which my delegation is prepared to support internationally binding law on the subject of willful termination of life in the absence of extenuating factors.
I believe this resolution is on the right track, and for that I offer my affirmation of its sentiment. However, we should not judge our right to kill a being by its ability to survive, but its ability to think and feel on levels consistent with internationally accepted standards of sentience.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Philimbesi » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:08 pm
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:12 pm
Philimbesi wrote:You can't honestly be thinking of re-re-re submitting this should it fail to reach quorum?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by The Cat-Tribe » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:17 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Thank you TCT for telegramming me about a typo that I made. Correction: in real life Spain, elective abortion is allowed during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, not the first 12 weeks.Xanthal wrote:I must give credit to the authors of this resolution, as it is perhaps the most thoughtfully-worded, intelligently-aimed legislation ever to come to the floor of the WA on this matter.
Thank you Delegate Xanthal.Xanthal wrote:However, it is the position of the Xanthalian government that the required extension of sentient rights to any being should be based on its present level of sentience, not past sentience or expectations of future sentience. While the Federation certainly does not begrudge other nations the right to extend these protections further, and abortion laws indeed vary by state within the Federation itself, sentience- not viability- is the sole minimum standard by which my delegation is prepared to support internationally binding law on the subject of willful termination of life in the absence of extenuating factors.
I believe this resolution is on the right track, and for that I offer my affirmation of its sentiment. However, we should not judge our right to kill a being by its ability to survive, but its ability to think and feel on levels consistent with internationally accepted standards of sentience.
I strongly will consider your recommendation, and this ( ^ ) probably will be the standard that I'll use in my next draft rather than viability. In humans, viability occurs around 24 weeks. I need to do more research about fetuses' ability to think, but, in a cursory search, it appears that thought, as we know it, begins around week 30.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone have any reliable facts about when fetal thought begins?
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:37 pm
The Cat-Tribe wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:Thank you TCT for telegramming me about a typo that I made. Correction: in real life Spain, elective abortion is allowed during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, not the first 12 weeks.Thank you Delegate Xanthal.
I strongly will consider your recommendation, and this ( ^ ) probably will be the standard that I'll use in my next draft rather than viability. In humans, viability occurs around 24 weeks. I need to do more research about fetuses' ability to think, but, in a cursory search, it appears that thought, as we know it, begins around week 30.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone have any reliable facts about when fetal thought begins?
I break my silence in post because I wish to make clear I told CD by TG that CD's entire post was filed with selective facts, twisted use of terms like "elective abortion," and plain falsehoods.
One example I gave of an error was Spain now allows abortion without any restrictions for the first 14 weeks of gestation. Spain also permits abortion at up to 22 weeks if two doctors certify that the pregnancy poses a serious threat to the woman’s life or health, as well as in cases of fetal impairment, and beyond 22 weeks in cases of severe fetal impairment. There are other loopholes in practice that make abortion widely available in Spain. Spain's newlaw is part of a wide and deep trend of liberalization of abortion law around the world.
Any implication that I agreed with or failed to strongly dispute any part of CD's prior post is incorrect. CD's entire campaign has been based on unsupported dogmatic beliefs, twisting of facts, and outright lies. This is unfortunate, as I believe such behavior beneath CD.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:40 pm
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:46 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:CD is trying to press his own version of "morals" upon the rest of the WA
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Intellect and the Arts » Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:57 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Does anyone have any reliable facts about when fetal thought begins?
by Xanthal » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:41 pm
by Linux and the X » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:14 pm
by Christian Democrats » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:45 pm
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:Does anyone have any reliable facts about when fetal thought begins?
Conscious brain waves are detectable sometime in the sixth month of pregnancy. I'll do some research on the exact week and send it to you via telegram if you would welcome the information.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Linux and the X » Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:15 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:58 am
Christian Democrats wrote:Intellect and the Arts wrote:Conscious brain waves are detectable sometime in the sixth month of pregnancy. I'll do some research on the exact week and send it to you via telegram if you would welcome the information.
I would welcome the information. Thank you for offering. I also need to do some of my own research.
by Intellect and the Arts » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:47 am
Christian Democrats wrote:Intellect and the Arts wrote:Conscious brain waves are detectable sometime in the sixth month of pregnancy. I'll do some research on the exact week and send it to you via telegram if you would welcome the information.
I would welcome the information. Thank you for offering. I also need to do some of my own research.
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Foetal thought doesn't matter honoured ambassador. Any attempt to ban abortion of the slightest kind is still intrusive to member states who may be overpopulated. Honoured ambassador from Christian Democrats, it's all over now. Any attempt at a revision will make the resentment worse, I'm afraid.
- Ms. S. Harper.
by Philimbesi » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:54 am
It may indeed be fairly moot at this point, milady, but at the very least I find myself intrigued to find out exactly what he plans to do with the information once he has it at his disposal.
by Just Guy » Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:08 am
by Christian Democrats » Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:15 pm
Just Guy wrote:CD, you'd be surprised how easy it is to get an abortion is Israel... Most of the laws you cited only apply de jure.
Christian Democrats wrote:For example, because I know you'll do the research, abortion on-demand is illegal in Israel, but there are a variety of circumstances under which abortion is allowed:
- Life
- Health
- Younger than 17 years
- Older than 40 years
- Fetal defects
- Rape, incest, etc.
- Extramarital sex (i.e., sex that occurred outside of marriage, including adultery and fornication)
I'm sorry if you feel my facts are misleading, but I was precise in using the term "elective."
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:21 pm
by Grays Harbor » Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:42 pm
by The Rich Port » Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:43 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Honoured ambassador, I don't understand how the Israeli example has to do with the draft but this draft still goes against the idea of making the world a better place to live. It is still allowing member states to throw women in jail for obtaining abortion because of rape or life threatening situations.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement