
by Tarnell » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:38 pm

by Liberty987 » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:40 pm

by Tarnell » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:43 pm
Liberty987 wrote:The EU is a good example of this as to why it would fail. Unfortunately trying to accommodate the running of two currencies in one nation is too much and the system would be so complicated the resolution would have to be long as to clear all the loose ends from it.

by Eireann Fae WA Mission » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:07 pm

by Tarnell » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:11 pm
Eireann Fae WA Mission wrote:"What of nations that do not use currency? Eireann Fae, for example, is a national community, where everybody simply does their part for the betterment of all. Monkiah, as we understand it, use labour as the basis of their economy. Your idea as proposed would be meaningless to us."

by Rutianas » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:15 pm

by Darenjo » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:58 pm

by Philimbesi WA Office » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:28 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:32 pm
Darenjo wrote:Sorry, but having a common currency is against WA rules.

by Tarnell » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:35 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Darenjo wrote:Sorry, but having a common currency is against WA rules.
This wouldn't be against the rules. It would be an international currency, acceptable alongside national currencies. The problem isn't legality, but rather if the idea is even logical. A currency has to have at least one nation behind it, otherwise the currency won't have anything on which to base its value.

by Bears Armed » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:39 pm

by Flibbleites » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:39 pm
Tarnell wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:This wouldn't be against the rules. It would be an international currency, acceptable alongside national currencies. The problem isn't legality, but rather if the idea is even logical. A currency has to have at least one nation behind it, otherwise the currency won't have anything on which to base its value.
Then i guess we continue.... what should we do now? drafT?

by Philimbesi WA Office » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:41 pm
Tarnell wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:This wouldn't be against the rules. It would be an international currency, acceptable alongside national currencies. The problem isn't legality, but rather if the idea is even logical. A currency has to have at least one nation behind it, otherwise the currency won't have anything on which to base its value.
Then i guess we continue.... what should we do now? drafT?

by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:42 pm
Tarnell wrote:Then i guess we continue.... what should we do now? drafT?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Simone Republic, States of Glory WA Office, Tinhampton, Walhistania, Witchcraft and Sorcery
Advertisement