NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Ban on GovernmentStates

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Topid
Minister
 
Posts: 2843
Founded: Dec 29, 2008
Capitalizt

[DRAFT] Ban on GovernmentStates

Postby Topid » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:50 pm

OOC1: I don't intend to submit it as I am fairly certain that pisses Ard off. And this conflicts with Freedom of Expression as well as other resolutions. I did it for fun.
OOC2: If you know the category description of a Moral Decency resolution please share it with me. As far as I can find the WA has never passed one so I can't find it.

Ban on GovernmentStates

*insert category description*
Category: Moral Decency | Strength: Mild | Proposed by: Topid

The World Assembly,

Regretting the existence of GovernmentStates as an online nation simulation game which has gained popularity within most World Assembly member states,

Recognizing the creator of a game to be a nutty, funny looking islander who writes unpopular books,

Believing the purpose of the game is to brainwash users into backing the radical views of the creator,

Outraged that the creator dares to use the World Assembly symbol and name as an international body within the game without permission from the World Assembly,

Angered by the fact that many of the games ‘regions’ are named after real nations, and in many cases actually make a mockery of these nations,

Shocked by the violent and public riots that have broken out following the implementation of various aspects of the game, such as the ‘Security Council’ which mimics the World Assembly Security Council,

Asserting that the game of GovernmentStates has caused only drastic problems for the international community,

Hereby:

1) Requires all member states to ban citizens from accessing GovernmentStates,

2) Encourages the use of various internet censorship methods to prevent accessing the site,

3) Encourages member states to use sufficient force to pacify the public demonstrations about the game more permanently,

4) Authorizes the World Assembly legal team to issue a poorly worded warning to the creator via the most unsecure form of communication imaginable.


The ambassador of Topid, Eric Draven, appears from the shadows in the corner of the room. He walks silently down the isle toward the podium as he prepares to speak. The crowd of ambassadors watch with moderate interest as a murder of crows follows him as if he controlled them. Reaching the podium, Mr. Draven places his papers on them and takes a moment to prepare. As he does, two of the crows fly up and position themselves menacingly on the corners of the podium. The rest of the murder fly in unison off the ground, around the room, cawing fiercely. They all dive at once landing on the ground in a large heartagram pattern. The crows, and the stunned ambassadors looking on remain perfectly still.

Eric's voice began, "Now that I have your attention, I bring you this warning. If the World Assembly fails to act on this issue these radicals will rock our governments to their core. GovernmentStates has proved time and time again to be a breeding ground for radicals! These ultra-leftist nut-jobs will argue with new users on the site until they are indoctrinated too, and then the new radical joins the masses in converting the others.

All around our nations, citizens are skipping work to play GovernmentStates, or playing it in the office instead of working. Students are cutting class to play, or sneaking into computer labs. The overall addictiveness of the game is almost as dangerous as the radical views it teaches.

It also spreads a don't-give-a-damn ideology. Who does this bald headed quack think he is to use OUR symbols and copyrights?

Stand with me, in silencing this enemy once and for all!"

As the speakers voice rose in emphasis of the last line, the crows sprang to life again, flying in circles around Eric Draven. He was concealed from site behind the crows, and when the crows scattered and flew out doors and windows around the room Draven was no where to be seen. He was finally observed sitting near the front of the rows of ambassadors calmly waiting for the first reply to his proposal as if nothing had happened.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:35 am

FYi, Moral decency is "A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency." ;)

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:38 am

Topid wrote: Stand with me, in silencing this enemy once and for all


That would be "No".
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
The New Aryan State
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 135
Founded: Jun 11, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Aryan State » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:45 am

The New Aryan State objects totally to the abolition of the online game 'GovernmentStates'. While we recognise the possible libellious nature of the game, as well as its many parodies of real-life nations and organisations, the status of its legality should remain the decision of individual national governments and not be enforced by the WA.
Bundesrepublik des Neuen Arischen Staat
Mainz ConventionUAACNISA
Bundeswaffen-FabrikFactbookApply for an Embassy

User avatar
Monikian WA Mission
Diplomat
 
Posts: 927
Founded: Nov 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Monikian WA Mission » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:48 am

The Monikian WA Mission is intrigued as to what this "Governmentstates" is. Is this some other newly discovered universe? Is this an attempt to ban nations which are not libertarian utopias? We do not understand the need for this legislation and unless that need is explained cannot support it.

That being said we would like to remind the Topid Delegation that bans on ideology are illegal.
All posts should be assumed to be IC unless I am using an OOC indicator.

Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.85

(An asterisk [*] {or exclamation point [!] at the beginning of a word} in Monikian Words indicates a clicking sound which is not easily translatable in the Latin alphabet)

some cool stuff

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:01 am

Ms Harper wondered: "I thought GovernmentStates 2 was much worse than the original: having to pay for custom fields that were free in the original GovernmentStates".

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:59 am

*closes the GovernmentStates page on his laptop*
"Obviously, we're all against that shameful mockery of international politics. My government fully supports the resolution."


OOC : I like it !
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
Topid
Minister
 
Posts: 2843
Founded: Dec 29, 2008
Capitalizt

Postby Topid » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:35 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Ms Harper wondered: "I thought GovernmentStates 2 was much worse than the original: having to pay for custom fields that were free in the original GovernmentStates".

Ponders the horrible thought: "Unquestionably, who knows what these dangerous nut-jobs that run GovernmentStates would be capable of if they had money!"

Monikian WA Mission wrote:The Monikian WA Mission is intrigued as to what this "Governmentstates" is. Is this some other newly discovered universe? Is this an attempt to ban nations which are not libertarian utopias? We do not understand the need for this legislation and unless that need is explained cannot support it.

That being said we would like to remind the Topid Delegation that bans on ideology are illegal.

OOC: If you read the OP, I fully acknowledge this was illegal, that is why I said I wouldn't submit it. But it was fun to write anyway. Second, GovernmentStates is supposed to resemble NationStates, and this resolution parodies NS in general and also the 2007 (right?) incident when the RL United Nations intervened with the game version of the UN. (Which you may be to young to remember, since I wasn't even in the game yet either.)

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:26 am

We would support it if it didnt violate multiple resolutions, as well as the entire concept of Net Neutrality.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:14 pm

Quadrimmina wrote:We would support it if it didnt violate multiple resolutions, as well as the entire concept of Net Neutrality.


Actually the proposal doesn't violate any existing resolution.

GA Res. # 30
Nonetheless convinced that free expression does not extend to such abuses as defamation, incitements to disorder, or academic fraud; (...)
Allows member states to set reasonable restrictions on expression in order to prevent (...) plagiarism, copyright or trademark infringement, (...) incitements to widespread lawlessness and disorder


GovernmentStates is a clear case of both trademark infringement and incitement to widespread lawlessness and disorder, as described in the clauses of the proposal.

[cliche]Think of the children ![/cliche]
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21281
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:24 pm

Frattastan wrote:
Quadrimmina wrote:We would support it if it didnt violate multiple resolutions, as well as the entire concept of Net Neutrality.


Actually the proposal doesn't violate any existing resolution.

GA Res. # 30
Nonetheless convinced that free expression does not extend to such abuses as defamation, incitements to disorder, or academic fraud; (...)
Allows member states to set reasonable restrictions on expression in order to prevent (...) plagiarism, copyright or trademark infringement, (...) incitements to widespread lawlessness and disorder


GovernmentStates is a clear case of both trademark infringement and incitement to widespread lawlessness and disorder, as described in the clauses of the proposal.

[cliche]Think of the children ![/cliche]

OOC: however it would be illegal for 'meta-gaming'.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Frattastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Oct 24, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:34 pm

Bears Armed wrote:OOC: however it would be illegal for 'meta-gaming'.


OOC : I know, I know. What a pity
San Francisco Bay Area (forum) | Founderless Regions Alliance (FRA) | Rejected Realms Army (RRA)

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

User avatar
Hobomcmuffin
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hobomcmuffin » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:15 pm

Here Here on the ban of GovermentStates that mockery of real government needs to be banned.

User avatar
Bazalonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 596
Founded: Nov 04, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Bazalonia » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:56 am

We object to blatantly stealing the World Assembly's good name and logo for something as crass as an online game.
Bazalonia.bz: For all your Bazalonian Government needs
Bazalonia, my characters, my settings - A Blog

* Han has an utter sinking feeling that details of this are going to surreptitiously slip out into someone's siggy...
<Han> so let's hope it's neither precognitive nor self-fulfilling...

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:03 am

OOC: Only one problem:

Is there any claim that it exists? Perhaps a source would be useful.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Ardchoille
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 9842
Founded: Apr 18, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ardchoille » Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:44 am

This "GovernmentStates" is clearly a feeble imitation of RealWorldTM, which my President has been shamelessly playing for longer than she's willing to admit, as recorded in several passages from the Missing Texts.

Distracting though such activities are -- she blames the failure of at least one Presidential relationship on RW's deadly allure -- we cannot in good faith support a move to ban any of them.

First, because it focusses on just one game in a cyberspace filled with such distractions. We do not wish the time of this august body to be wasted by serial bans on every minor internet game.

Second, because it would be appalling interference in the activities of the Free Market Fairy, in whom, as a magical nation, we most sincerely believe. Truly.

-- John McGonnagle, Secretary for Situations Like This, in the absence of
-- Dicey Reilly, Wrongfully President for Life of Ardchoille and currently being eaten alive by mosquitoes in the Great Stinky Swamp.
Ideological Bulwark #35
The more scandalous charges were suppressed; the vicar of Christ was accused only of piracy, rape, sodomy, murder and incest. -- Edward Gibbon on the schismatic Pope John XXIII (1410–1415).


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Simone Republic, States of Glory WA Office, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads