Advertisement

by Eireann Fae » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:56 am

by Monikian WA Mission » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:36 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Don't people realise, we can make hover cars, right?

by Soviet Enartio » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:37 am

by Mikedor » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:46 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Hover cars can be parked atop of buildings? Or... So on, We don't need autobahns or highways, its such a trouble maintaining them, just look at the decrease of deaths if we do! It will stop much trouble in our city!

by Mesogiria » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:50 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Hover cars can be parked atop of buildings? Or... So on, We don't need autobahns or highways, its such a trouble maintaining them, just look at the decrease of deaths if we do! It will stop much trouble in our city!

by Embolalia » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:54 am
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by DemocraticConfusion » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:01 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Don't people realise, we can make hover cars, right?

by Kington Langley » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:03 am

by Soviet Enartio » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:07 am
DemocraticConfusion wrote:Soviet Enartio wrote:Don't people realise, we can make hover cars, right?
Nope, not in our nation as of yet. This proposal, in addition to not being formatted properly or having even the slightest apearrence of professionalism, is without sound fact for support and at its best is assinine.
-Ms. Abigail McGuire.

by Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:08 am
Kington Langley wrote:I laugh at this proposal, why would you get rid of motorways? It's the vehicles that use them that cause the environmental problems, not the roads. Simply getting rid of motorways and dual-carriageways will not remove the problem.

by Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:10 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:DemocraticConfusion wrote:
Nope, not in our nation as of yet. This proposal, in addition to not being formatted properly or having even the slightest apearrence of professionalism, is without sound fact for support and at its best is assinine.
-Ms. Abigail McGuire.
We can give you the technology



by Monikian WA Mission » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:17 am
I know the WA is filled with privileged ambassadors, but have none of you ever driven a car before? If you had, you'd know plenty of people have a hard time handling a car in two dimensions; what makes you think they could handle three? And thus, the reason why flying cars will not be a viable option for the masses, at least not in this timeline.

by Meekinos » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:18 am
Embolalia wrote:I know the WA is filled with privileged ambassadors, but have none of you ever driven a car before? If you had, you'd know plenty of people have a hard time handling a car in two dimensions; what makes you think they could handle three? And thus, the reason why flying cars will not be a viable option for the masses, at least not in this timeline.

by Soviet Enartio » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:26 am

by Meekinos » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:30 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Lets just get rid of atleast a part of some major highways, yes?

by Flibbleites » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:32 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Lets just get rid of atleast a part of some major highways, yes?

by DemocraticConfusion » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:34 am
Soviet Enartio wrote:Lets just get rid of atleast a part of some major highways, yes?

by Great Nepal » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Simone Republic, States of Glory WA Office, Tinhampton
Advertisement