NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] International Sporting Act

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] International Sporting Act

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:24 pm

A draft that I had lying around that I thought I'd share with you...

International Sporting Act
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
Category: International Security | Strength: Mild | Proposed By: Unibot


The General Assembly,

Understanding that international sporting events unite the world by demonstrating that sportsmanship need not conform to territorial integrity,

Recognizing the cultural awareness that international sporting events facilitate, as citizens of all countries participate with equal opportunity for athletes to succeed,

Noting that the World Assembly is the most influential international institution, and has both the resources and the international participation to commit to organizing a semi-annual, apolitical sporting event for the world,

Hereby,

1. Declares that no member-nation shall send a particular athlete or personnel to any international sporting event for the purposes of espionage, assassination or any violent means of foreign policy;

2. Outlaws any government policy that punishes or blatantly ignores the punishment of (via incarceration or physical injury) someone for theirs or someone else’s performance at an international sporting event;

3. Establishes the World Assembly Sporting Council for the purposes of organizing and conducting an annual international sporting event that meets the following stipulations, said event:

• Is held semi-annually (to accommodate sports that feasibly require certain climates) at the same general location, in neutral and apolitical territory that is easily accessible by conventional forms of transportation and geographically appropriate for the sports involved in the event -- in addition to not being subject to the jurisdiction of any nation;
• Includes venues for sports that are (1) recognized and commonly played in multiple regions of the world, (2) generally inoffensive to most cultures;
• Should be open and able to accommodate all members of the press and broadcasters within reason;
• Cannot discriminate athletes on the basis of any arbitrary categorization such as age or race;
• Utilizes politically neutral referees and judging personnel for the venues, who are forbidden from accepting bribes;
• Opposes the modification of an athlete’s body or mind via manufactured chemicals to improve their performance, by conducting random drug screening of athletes and imposing punitive measures such as disqualification, interdiction and demonstrating international disapproval against the athletes and any relevant parties;
• Is open to all member-nations that wish to represent themselves in the event;
• Will have the necessary security provided by the World Assembly Office of Building Management (OBM) to secure the safety of all its attendees;

4. Affirms that it is the duty and the responsibility of the World Assembly Sporting Council to manage all rulesets of venues, the dissemination of the rulesets and any appeals to the rulesets;

5. Permits the right of protestors to nonviolently protest outside of an event’s facility, so long as said protest is not a physical impediment to the event;

6. Encourages further legislation to provide economic opportunities to the athletes of impoverished nations.


*shrugs* It's an attempt, at-least.
Last edited by Unibot on Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:37 pm

(OOC: I foresee a lot of 'protesting' for this resolution :p Anyway, is 'biannual' once every two years or twice a year? I've always used it for once every two years, and semi-annual for twice a year, but it looks like you're using it differently.)

User avatar
Greenlandic People
Envoy
 
Posts: 346
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greenlandic People » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:42 pm

We have a few concerns with this initial draft, ambassador.

1. Declares that no member-nation shall send a particular athlete or personnel to any international sporting event for the purposes of espionage, assassination or any other hostile means of foreign policy;


This reads nicely enough, and I understand your intent, but I'm concerned about the implications of that last part - "any other hostile means of foreign policy". How do we quantify what is a hostile act and what is not? Would sending a minority to the games to race against athletes from a second, "supremacist" state be considered hostile? There is a little too much ambiguity.

2. Outlaws any government policy that punishes or blatantly ignores the punishment of (via incarceration or physical injury) someone for theirs or someone else’s performance at an international sporting event;


Are we to understand that all member states are now legally compelled to speak out against each and every such incident when it occurs, regardless of its pertinence to that state?

We further recommend that the ambassador from Unibot add a clause which specifies the manner in which a member state would apply to have their country serve as host for the games and the procedure involved.

~Sigismund Ibsen,
Greenlandic Ambassador to the World Assembly
Member of ODECON
Regional Pages: Forum | Web page | Wiki Page
National Pages: Wiki | Factbook
Author of GA Resolutions: #58 | #64

User avatar
Bloodstone Kay
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Feb 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Bloodstone Kay » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:42 pm

How the hell does a sporting event come under international security?

Kari Kagrosi
WA Pirate.
Duke Sulin Solibu IV
WA Pirate/Delegate

Warning: the player posts in Character, and will respond in Character.

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:47 pm

Eireann Fae wrote:(OOC: I foresee a lot of 'protesting' for this resolution :p Anyway, is 'biannual' once every two years or twice a year? I've always used it for once every two years, and semi-annual for twice a year, but it looks like you're using it differently.)


Hhhm, I've changed it to semi-annual, because I know that's twice a year for sure.

This reads nicely enough, and I understand your intent, but I'm concerned about the implications of that last part - "any other hostile means of foreign policy". How do we quantify what is a hostile act and what is not? Would sending a minority to the games to race against athletes from a second, "supremacist" state be considered hostile? There is a little too much ambiguity.


Hhhhm, I'll use the word, 'violent'.

Are we to understand that all member states are now legally compelled to speak out against each and every such incident when it occurs, regardless of its pertinence to that state?


No one is compelling you to speak out against, just don't commit the act.

We further recommend that the ambassador from Unibot add a clause which specifies the manner in which a member state would apply to have their country serve as host for the games and the procedure involved.


There are no host countries currently, we think that it would add a political dimension (boycotts, bids, auctions) that is unnecessary. We've designed the event to take place on a plot of neutral territory belonging to the WA.
Last edited by Unibot on Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:49 pm

Bloodstone Kay wrote:How the hell does a sporting event come under international security?

Kari Kagrosi
WA Pirate.


Clauses 1 is particularly concerned with international security as is other sections such as Clause 5 -- the category is tentative, do you have a better suggestion?

User avatar
Bloodstone Kay
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Feb 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Bloodstone Kay » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:53 pm

Unibot wrote:
Bloodstone Kay wrote:How the hell does a sporting event come under international security?

Kari Kagrosi
WA Pirate.


Clauses 1 is particularly concerned with international security as is other sections such as Clause 5 -- the category is tentative, do you have a better suggestion?


I'd suggest "Bloody Stupid" as a category. The organisation of sporting events is not something the WA should ever vote on.
Duke Sulin Solibu IV
WA Pirate/Delegate

Warning: the player posts in Character, and will respond in Character.

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:57 pm

Bloodstone Kay wrote:
Unibot wrote:
Clauses 1 is particularly concerned with international security as is other sections such as Clause 5 -- the category is tentative, do you have a better suggestion?


I'd suggest "Bloody Stupid" as a category. The organisation of sporting events is not something the WA should ever vote on.


I see. Thank you.

User avatar
Grand Europic States
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 113
Founded: Jun 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Europic States » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:27 pm

Unibot wrote:
• Is held semi-annually (to accommodate sports that feasibly require certain climates) at the same general location, in neutral and apolitical territory that is easily accessible by conventional forms of transportation and geographically appropriate for the sports involved in the event -- in addition to not being subject to the jurisdiction of any nation


With the 'same general location' may it not be better to remove this part if different sports require radically different climates? It may be difficult to find a territory that has such a versatile climate that it could host both events at different times of the year.

Secondly, with regard to the part about 'easily accessible by conventional forms of transport' we wonder if it would be possible to find a territory that is easily accessible to all nations, regardless of what transport they use.
Last edited by Grand Europic States on Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ambassador Tristan Winstrom
Permanent Representative of The New Republic of Grand Europic States to the World Assembly
Minister of State for the Europic Diplomatic Corps
President of the Council of Europic Diplomats

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:49 pm

We need the WA to provide security for international sporting events now? How ever do some nations manage to deal with these things now?

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Embolalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1670
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Embolalia » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:00 pm

1. would disallow boxing, wrestling, and other violent sports, if they were part of a foreign policy initiative. [/troll]
Anyway, looks like some good harmless legislation. I support.
Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
Bible quote? No, that's just common sense.
/ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/
The United Commonwealth of Embolalia

Gafin Gower, Prime minister
E. Rory Hywel, Ambassador to the World Assembly
Gwaredd LLwyd, Lieutenant Ambassador to the World Assembly
Author: GA#95, GA#107, GA#132, GA#185
Philimbesi wrote:Repeal, resign, or relax.

Embassy Exchange
EBC News
My mostly worthless blog
Economic Left/Right: -5.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
@marcmack wrote:I believe we can build a better world! Of course, it'll take a whole lot of rock, water & dirt. Also, not sure where to put it."

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:16 pm

Krioval wrote:We need the WA to provide security for international sporting events now? How ever do some nations manage to deal with these things now?

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval


?

It's not providing security for all sporting events, other than Clause one, which is just regarding athletic conduct.

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:26 pm

Unibot wrote:
Krioval wrote:We need the WA to provide security for international sporting events now? How ever do some nations manage to deal with these things now?

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval


It's not providing security for all sporting events, other than Clause one, which is just regarding athletic conduct.


Then it's miscategorized.

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:30 pm

Krioval wrote:
Unibot wrote:
It's not providing security for all sporting events, other than Clause one, which is just regarding athletic conduct.


Then it's miscategorized.

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval


Yep, thinking about it. Category aside, is there a problem with the proposal itself?

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:47 pm

Unibot wrote:Yep, thinking about it. Category aside, is there a problem with the proposal itself?


I think that it's not exactly necessary, and that it has essentially unenforceable clauses (the first) and is looking for a coherent theme. Other than some warm fuzzies and the bit about espionage, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish that rises to the level of international importance.

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:43 pm

Krioval wrote:I think that it's not exactly necessary, and that it has essentially unenforceable clauses (the first) and is looking for a coherent theme. Other than some warm fuzzies and the bit about espionage, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish that rises to the level of international importance.


"We like the proposal because it fosters international goodwill in the form of friendly competition. Not that the Faeries would be likely to participate in many events, but we appreciate the idea, just the same." Rowan smiles at the idea of Faeries attempting to wrestle or fence or out-swim other competitors. After thinking a moment, Episky whispers something more for the girl to say. "I guess we are in it for the 'warm fuzzies', but that does not make it a bad idea."

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126557
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:29 pm

Greetings from Ethel Mermania, a small country with a fondness for broadway musicals.

The nameless drones of the ethel mermanian foreign service answer that this is something left best to private industry, you know like the fake worlds Olympics or FIFA. These things are a cash cows. Private industry can cover all the expenses and still make a tremendous profit which we could tax and generating revenue for the participating nations state, Sponsorship deals, broadcasting rights, ceral boxes etc.. Make it government run that all goes out the toilet.

Also it eliminates citizens rights not to pay for it, not that we care in Ethel mermania, but someone who does not like sports should not have his tax dollars go to an international event, that would generate a taxable profit if it were left in private hands.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:41 pm

Hhhm, Ethel and Mr. Søgård have persuaded me to indefinitely withhold this project from further drafting or submission ... I was never entirely convinced on it myself. Thank you, sorry for wasting your time.

User avatar
Enn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Jan 26, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Enn » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:43 pm

Speaking as someone who supported the original Hersfordian Olympics proposal (OOC: the proposal that effectively created the metagaming rule), I can't say that I'm impressed by this. Perhaps it's my age, but I'm not sure the WA needs to get involved in this sort of matter.

Stephanie Fulton,
WA Co-Ambassador for Enn
I know what gay science is.
Reploid Productions wrote:The World Assembly as a whole terrifies me!
Pythagosaurus wrote:You are seriously deluded about the technical competence of the average human.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21281
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:15 am

Embolalia wrote:1. would disallow boxing, wrestling, and other violent sports, if they were part of a foreign policy initiative. [/troll]

"And those are some of the events within which Bears Armed's Olympic entrants are, on past form, most likely to win medals: Opposed!"


Artorrios o SouthWoods,
Chairbear, Bears Armed Mission at the World Assembly
for
The High Council of Clans,
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed.


_______________________________________________________

OOC: I strongly suggest that you also post about this proposal in the 'NS Sports' forum, to see whether any of the other regulars there have anything to say about it too...


Unibot wrote:Hhhm, Ethel and Mr. Søgård have persuaded me to indefinitely withhold this project from further drafting or submission ... I was never entirely convinced on it myself. Thank you, sorry for wasting your time.


Ah, never mind then.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:54 am

Ms. Harper cannot see how the WA should interfere with the rules of sport, if ever.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:30 am

We are curious as to why the WA believes it necessary to interfere in sport, and dictate what the rules are, what sports are acceptable, and when international competitions should be held? Is the sporting world in disarray? Or is there a pressing need to control every jot and tittle of the lives of everybody? We cannot support this in any form.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:38 am

Grays Harbor wrote:We are curious as to why the WA believes it necessary to interfere in sport, and dictate what the rules are, what sports are acceptable, and when international competitions should be held? Is the sporting world in disarray? Or is there a pressing need to control every jot and tittle of the lives of everybody? We cannot support this in any form.


Errr, this wasn't disallowing certain sports (at-least not in intention), accept in the case of the particular international sport event being run by the WA.

User avatar
Lowell Leber
Minister
 
Posts: 2129
Founded: Jan 27, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Lowell Leber » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:30 pm

This appears to be unecessary and inappropriate in scope for the WA to deal with. Perhaps some independent body (OOC-An RP'd Body) or ad-hoc organization could handle such issues?

With Regards,
Ms. Abigail McGuire.
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Empire of Lowell Leber.
IC The Leberite Empire


New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 4/2/11

User avatar
Intellect and the Arts
Diplomat
 
Posts: 530
Founded: Sep 20, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Intellect and the Arts » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:47 pm

And in the event that WA member nations wanted to hold a sporting event that specifically tested certain performance-enhancing drugs in a recreational fashion, they'd be smacked upon? Pharmaceutical research may be wacky, but it doesn't have to be boring.

This is a national issue, not an international one. In the event that nations partaking in an international sporting event want to be sure there's no cheating or the like, they can create an accord specifically for the event in question.
Ambassadors: Arik S. Drake, and Alice M. Drake, twins

UNOG Member
Intellect and Art (NatSovOrg Member)
The Illustrious Renae
Ex-Parrot
Ennill
NERVUN wrote:By my powers combined, I am CAPTAIN MODERATION!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: States of Glory WA Office

Advertisement

Remove ads