Parti Ouvrier wrote:Epistamai wrote:Raising taxes to pay for those that were irresponsible for their retirement plans is immoral. Why should responsible members of society be punished for the frivolous spending and short sightedness of a minority? If you are going to be irresponsible with your money, no one else should be forced to bail you out.
If you want some sort of pension fund, that allow for the private sector to create one. It will be much better managed than a government program.
I quite agree, thank you. We should raise taxes for those that were irresponsible with other people's retirement plans.
' Why should responsible members of society be punished for the frivolous spending and short sightedness of a minority? ' I agree, the casino speculators, bankers, top financiers, irresponsible insurance industry and accountants, (Arthur Anderson, Fannie Mae- now taken over by the US govt. ), should pay. And yet we were forced to bail out the irresponsible by privatizing profits and nationalizing the losses.
So instead we are supposed to bend over for your communistic "cradle to grave" philosophy? Because you believe some are "frivolous", it does not automatically follow that all are "frivolous". That is a false assumption. Your argument appears based more on an antagonism towards capitalist systems while favouring communist systems. This, to us, is disturbing, and borders on ideological bans.
We get it, you hate capitalists. You love communists. We do not all wish to be communists. Stop trying to push ideology in the guise of "helping".



Honestly I tend to RP the USP a lot smaller using the population number as the total number of citizens the USP has ever had and then taking a percentage of that number out as decesed. So all my numbers are lower than what's there. (Unless I'm feeling blustery then I act like I could run a nation with close to 7 billion people in it
)