NATION

PASSWORD

Senior Citizens Act

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:31 am

I think a better compromise would be a simple resolution which bans compulsory retirement and affirms the right to retirement, while allowing member states to set a threshold of retirement of their choice (a la Threshold of Majority). It could go under Free trade, Mild, on the basis of improving economic efficiency and encouraging citizens to work as long as they like.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:31 am

The ambassador stated to me earlier in the debate that the topic of how unpleasant a job would be up to a democratic vote.
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Mesogiria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Dec 03, 2009
Corporate Bordello

Postby Mesogiria » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:41 am

Philimbesi wrote:The ambassador stated to me earlier in the debate that the topic of how unpleasant a job would be up to a democratic vote.

Ah, thank you, esteemed delegate. I was distracted by the incessant bickering that seems to have erupted here.

I suppose then the question becomes "A democratic vote by whom?" I don't think any segment of any electorate can be counted upon not to favor itself unfairly in such a vote.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:46 am

You're most welcome... and you ask a most excellent question. One I fear I don't have answer for.


Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:50 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I think a better compromise would be a simple resolution which bans compulsory retirement and affirms the right to retirement, while allowing member states to set a threshold of retirement of their choice (a la Threshold of Majority). It could go under Free trade, Mild, on the basis of improving economic efficiency and encouraging citizens to work as long as they like.


I'm glad someone is thinking rationally. Feel free to re-write it in your own words, you have my permission to use any of my words.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Epistamai
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Sep 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Epistamai » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:52 am

How is this an international issue? Stop trying to force your lazy commie ways on other nations.

If you want your government to be ever present in the lives of your citizens than do so... just keep your economically disastrous and oppressive policies to yourself.
Last edited by Epistamai on Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:58 am

'We are in the minority.... We must teach the masses not to trust the Compromisers and defensists.'

L.Trotsky, (The Bolsheviks and Lenin) History of the Russian Revolution
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:01 am

"Those who quote others... can't defend their own opinions" ~Philimbesi.
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:02 am

Philimbesi wrote:"Those who quote others... can't defend their own opinions" ~Philimbesi.


Well put.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Epistamai
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Sep 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Epistamai » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:05 am

The only good communist is a dead communist


A much better known quote than yours.
Last edited by Epistamai on Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:06 am

Epistamai wrote:How is this an international issue? Stop trying to force your lazy commie ways on other nations.

If you want your government to be ever present in the lives of your citizens than do so... just keep your economically disastrous and oppressive policies to yourself.


Another comment based on irrationality. And coming from a nation that spends most of its budget on defense and law and order I find it incredible that you say that. How's NAZI Europe? Surplus capital and profit,(falling rate of profit) causes unemployment. We could abolish unemployment by sharing the work.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:09 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Philimbesi wrote:"Those who quote others... can't defend their own opinions" ~Philimbesi.


Well put.


Wasn't personal, no of course not!

And I'm sorry, but I read.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Epistamai
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Sep 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Epistamai » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:14 am

Parti Ouvrier wrote:Another comment based on irrationality. And coming from a nation that spends most of its budget on defense and law and order I find it incredible that you say that. How's NAZI Europe? Surplus capital and profit,(falling rate of profit) causes unemployment. We could abolish unemployment by sharing the work.


National defense, law and order, and education. The government should not be involved in anything else. The government's purpose is to create and implement laws, so that the private sector can run smoothly. National defense is a great example of a public good, that is also very important. Education is important for the government so that everyone can educate themselves, no matter what their background. Once they have their education, it is up to the individual to exercise personal responsibility.

I assure you that we attempt to privatize as much as we can, in the above cases, government funds the programs, which are delivered by private contracts. Police services are largely privately owned and contracted by the government, as is the education system and much of the military.

And yes, life in NAZI EUROPE is very nice. Very few communists.

OOC: ;)
Last edited by Epistamai on Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:19 am

Epistamai wrote:
Parti Ouvrier wrote:Another comment based on irrationality. And coming from a nation that spends most of its budget on defense and law and order I find it incredible that you say that. How's NAZI Europe? Surplus capital and profit,(falling rate of profit) causes unemployment. We could abolish unemployment by sharing the work.


National defense, law and order, and education. The government should not be involved in anything else. The government's purpose is to create and implement laws, so that the private sector can run smoothly. National defense is a great example of a public good, that is also very important. Education is important for the government so that everyone can educate themselves, no matter what their background. Once they have their education, it is up to the individual to exercise personal responsibility.

I assure you that we attempt to privatize as much as we can, in the above cases, government funds the programs, which are delivered by private contracts. Police services are largely privately owned and contracted by the government, as is the education system and much of the military.

And yes, life in NAZI EUROPE is very nice. Very few communists.

OOC: ;)


Yes, I know an anti-communist Nationalist when I see one.
Last edited by Parti Ouvrier on Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:23 am

And I'm sorry, but I read.


As do I... I just try not to regurgitate, especially since it tends to get on everyone's shoes and make them not like me.
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Mesogiria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Dec 03, 2009
Corporate Bordello

Postby Mesogiria » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:24 am

Philimbesi wrote:You're most welcome... and you ask a most excellent question. One I fear I don't have answer for.


Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA

"Somehow, I don't think an answer is likely to be forthcoming at this time."

Delegate Rodriguez sits back in her chair and sighs deeply. Thank the Goddess I get hardship pay for this crap she thinks.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:34 am

While we're asking questions that aren't going to be answered. Getting back to the idea of state pensions. In the USP a quick calculation indicates we have 938 million retired citizens. )Incidentally that is 637 million more than the ambassador has in his entire country...)

I would assume the ambassador feels as though the USP should raise the income tax rate on it's workforce to pay for it?
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:43 am

Philimbesi wrote:While we're asking questions that aren't going to be answered. Getting back to the idea of state pensions. In the USP a quick calculation indicates we have 938 million retired citizens. )Incidentally that is 637 million more than the ambassador has in his entire country...)

I would assume the ambassador feels as though the USP should raise the income tax rate on it's workforce to pay for it?


At least you admit it is an assumption.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Mesogiria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Dec 03, 2009
Corporate Bordello

Postby Mesogiria » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:46 am

Parti Ouvrier wrote:
Philimbesi wrote:While we're asking questions that aren't going to be answered. Getting back to the idea of state pensions. In the USP a quick calculation indicates we have 938 million retired citizens. )Incidentally that is 637 million more than the ambassador has in his entire country...)

I would assume the ambassador feels as though the USP should raise the income tax rate on it's workforce to pay for it?


At least you admit it is an assumption.

And yet you have nothing else to say. Perhaps someone ought to contact your government, and determine if hey think their money spent on your salary well spent.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:46 am

Sorry ambassador was my question unclear?
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Glen-Rhodes
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9027
Founded: Jun 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Glen-Rhodes » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:48 am

Grays Harbor wrote:Demand all you want to. This sort of social engineering is unwelcome to most here.

Please speak for yourself. Some of us have already drafted a proposal on social security.

- Dr. B. Castro

User avatar
Epistamai
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Sep 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Epistamai » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:49 am

Raising taxes to pay for those that were irresponsible for their retirement plans is immoral. Why should responsible members of society be punished for the frivolous spending and short sightedness of a minority? If you are going to be irresponsible with your money, no one else should be forced to bail you out.

If you want some sort of pension fund, that allow for the private sector to create one. It will be much better managed than a government program.

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2806
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:58 am

Epistamai wrote:Raising taxes to pay for those that were irresponsible for their retirement plans is immoral. Why should responsible members of society be punished for the frivolous spending and short sightedness of a minority? If you are going to be irresponsible with your money, no one else should be forced to bail you out.

If you want some sort of pension fund, that allow for the private sector to create one. It will be much better managed than a government program.


I quite agree, thank you. We should raise taxes for those that were irresponsible with other people's retirement plans.
' Why should responsible members of society be punished for the frivolous spending and short sightedness of a minority? ' I agree, the casino speculators, bankers, top financiers, irresponsible insurance industry and accountants, (Arthur Anderson, Fannie Mae- now taken over by the US govt. ), should pay. And yet we were forced to bail out the irresponsible by privatizing profits and nationalizing the losses.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:44 am

And how does the ambassador expect to retrieve income taxes from a citizen who isn't making an INCOME?
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:53 pm

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:Demand all you want to. This sort of social engineering is unwelcome to most here.

Please speak for yourself. Some of us have already drafted a proposal on social security.

- Dr. B. Castro


What part of "MOST" was unclear to you, Castro? We would never ever speak for you. Our mind works rationally, unlike some.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads