
by Barrantopia » Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:25 am

by Bloodstone Kay » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:37 am

by Mousebumples » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:29 am

by Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:32 am
Barrantopia wrote:1) Which catagory in the General Assembly would I place it under.
Barrantopia wrote:2) Would it gain enough support.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:51 am

by Strategion » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:31 am

by Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:08 am
Strategion wrote:As long as by football you mean the game played with feet, you have our support (:

by Meekinos » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:22 am

by Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:48 am
Meekinos wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:
The ambassador rolled his eyes, "Bloody hell... what else are you going to use besides feet, ... your ears?"
Apparently there is some bizarre and vulgar version of rugby (a wonderful sport by the way) but instead uses the name "football" and its players wear obscene amounts of padding and form piles of limbs as they tackle their opponents to get the ball. The ball is held in hand. Or so our diplomats tell us. Few have seen the sport and can't understand why it's called "football' since the ball isn't handled by the feet.

by Meekinos » Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:47 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Meekinos wrote:Apparently there is some bizarre and vulgar version of rugby (a wonderful sport by the way) but instead uses the name "football" and its players wear obscene amounts of padding and form piles of limbs as they tackle their opponents to get the ball. The ball is held in hand. Or so our diplomats tell us. Few have seen the sport and can't understand why it's called "football' since the ball isn't handled by the feet.
How....strange. Is this sport popular anywhere? However do they score a goal if they do naught else than pile upon each other? It sounds a dreadful barbaric sport.

by Cardoness » Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:49 pm
Frustrated Franciscans wrote:We are firmly against the godless, utopian, progressive overreach that a small number of nations in the World Assembly want to impose upon the multiverse...

by Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:46 pm
Cardoness wrote:We too have heard of this, for lack of a better word, sport. The Crown Prince even had occasion to witness it being played while on a diplomatic visit to a backward and rather uncivilized country, he said it was frightfully dull as there was about ten seconds of action fallowed by 30-60 seconds of standing around. Apparently, they score by running what they call a ball, though this ball is not round, into the goal area or throwing this ball to a player already in the goal area without being overtaken by the other team, this gives them 6 scores for some reason. They then get the ball back and they can kick it into a smaller goal area for another score or try to run/pass it into the larger goal area for 2 scores. Instead of getting the ball into the larger goal area in the first place, they could choose to kick the ball into the smaller goal area for 3 scores. I am also informed that this sport has more rules then a large buracracy, they take many breaks in the middle of play, are overly concerned about player safety and yet have more players hurt then any of the more civilized sports. I am at a loss as to why it is called "football" except that I believe they are trying to cash in on the marketing of real football.

by Bergnovinaia » Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:50 pm

by Cardoness » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:26 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Cardoness wrote:We too have heard of this, for lack of a better word, sport. The Crown Prince even had occasion to witness it being played while on a diplomatic visit to a backward and rather uncivilized country, he said it was frightfully dull as there was about ten seconds of action fallowed by 30-60 seconds of standing around. Apparently, they score by running what they call a ball, though this ball is not round, into the goal area or throwing this ball to a player already in the goal area without being overtaken by the other team, this gives them 6 scores for some reason. They then get the ball back and they can kick it into a smaller goal area for another score or try to run/pass it into the larger goal area for 2 scores. Instead of getting the ball into the larger goal area in the first place, they could choose to kick the ball into the smaller goal area for 3 scores. I am also informed that this sport has more rules then a large buracracy, they take many breaks in the middle of play, are overly concerned about player safety and yet have more players hurt then any of the more civilized sports. I am at a loss as to why it is called "football" except that I believe they are trying to cash in on the marketing of real football.
Hnh. Whatever shall they think of next? Maybe hitting a small round ball with a stick and running in circles. Nah, thats just too silly for words. Nobody in their right mind would pervert Cricket like that.
Frustrated Franciscans wrote:We are firmly against the godless, utopian, progressive overreach that a small number of nations in the World Assembly want to impose upon the multiverse...

by East Klent » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:32 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Cardoness wrote:We too have heard of this, for lack of a better word, sport. The Crown Prince even had occasion to witness it being played while on a diplomatic visit to a backward and rather uncivilized country, he said it was frightfully dull as there was about ten seconds of action fallowed by 30-60 seconds of standing around. Apparently, they score by running what they call a ball, though this ball is not round, into the goal area or throwing this ball to a player already in the goal area without being overtaken by the other team, this gives them 6 scores for some reason. They then get the ball back and they can kick it into a smaller goal area for another score or try to run/pass it into the larger goal area for 2 scores. Instead of getting the ball into the larger goal area in the first place, they could choose to kick the ball into the smaller goal area for 3 scores. I am also informed that this sport has more rules then a large buracracy, they take many breaks in the middle of play, are overly concerned about player safety and yet have more players hurt then any of the more civilized sports. I am at a loss as to why it is called "football" except that I believe they are trying to cash in on the marketing of real football.
Hnh. Whatever shall they think of next? Maybe hitting a small round ball with a stick and running in circles. Nah, thats just too silly for words. Nobody in their right mind would pervert Cricket like that.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement