
by Avoin Mieli » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:00 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:21 pm

by Mousebumples » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:28 pm

by Avoin Mieli » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:29 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Hm. 'Advancement of Industry' has the following Areas of Effect: environmental deregulation, labor deregulation, protective tariffs, and tort reform. Which ones does this proposal fall under?

by Avoin Mieli » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:31 pm
Mousebumples wrote:Legislating NS Sports?
Opposed as written.
Encouraging sports and athletics for youths in school (and perhaps recreational leagues for adults) might be a better approach to take that I could see myself potentially supporting ... depending on how it turns out.

by Mousebumples » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:25 pm
Avoin Mieli wrote:It is not the "legalization" of NS Sports, it is making NS Sports larger, it is expanding the amount of variety when it comes to leagues and it makes it easier for nations to join a league because of the creation of leagues mentioned in Section Eight of the bill.

by Avoin Mieli » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:43 pm
Mousebumples wrote:Avoin Mieli wrote:It is not the "legalization" of NS Sports, it is making NS Sports larger, it is expanding the amount of variety when it comes to leagues and it makes it easier for nations to join a league because of the creation of leagues mentioned in Section Eight of the bill.
I didn't say that you were making NS Sports legal.
I said that you were LEGISLATING ... as in creating legislation with regards to NS Sports. (Which may or may not be legal. I'd have to double-check the rules to be certain. I'm thinking that it might be meta-gaming?)
Also, as you appear to be something of a newbie, this proposal (should it, theoretically, pass and become a WA resolution) would not affect the forum side of NS Sports. Such events could be role-played, but their would be no effects seen in the NS Sports forums.

by Erythrina » Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am

by Mousebumples » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:29 am
Avoin Mieli wrote:I did misread your text, I apologize. But I am legislating NS Sports. I am making it easier to navigate in the forum and it would be easier to track standings, etc. I would even personally go to lengths to create websites for each individual league.

by Grays Harbor » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:35 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:35 am
STATING That in order for this Association to work, A moderator to keep track of said leagues.

by Flibbleites » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:45 am
Avoin Mieli wrote:(Section Five) STATING That in order for this Association to work, A moderator to keep track of said leagues.
The Rules wrote:MetaGaming is a difficult to understand category at times, especially since it often shares jurisdiction with Game Mechanics violations. Essentially, a MetaGaming violation is one that breaks "the fourth wall", or attempts to force events outside of the WA itself. Proposals dealing with Regions, with other nations, Moderators, and requiring activities on the Forums are examples. This also includes proposals that try to affect non-WA nations.

by Embolalia » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:52 am
Pick the category, then write the proposal to fit. Don't try and shoehorn the proposal into a category.Avoin Mieli wrote:What would you suggest would be a better category, sir?
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by Delaclava » Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:52 am

by Flibbleites » Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:50 pm
Embolalia wrote:^^ I suppose "moderator" could mean one who moderates, as opposed to an in-game moderator. But that would need to be defined as such in the proposal.

by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:56 pm
Flibbleites wrote:But it would still be mandating the action of a player which is still a metagaming violation.

by Flibbleites » Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:59 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:11 pm
Flibbleites wrote:That's doesn't matter, it's still saying that person A has to do something which is still a metagaming violation.
by Ardchoille » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:24 pm
RECOGNIZING That many nations participate and run Lacrosse, Football, Baseball tournaments on threads.
(Section Six) DEFINING "Keep track of" simply as making sure that these individual stay intact.
Officials, to be known as 'moderators', shall be appointed to keep track of the leagues.
Moderators shall be appointed on a limited term contract but may be dismissed at any time by (some governing committee?) for failure to perform the following duties ....

by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:27 pm
Ardchoille wrote:But the word has to be read in context with the rest of the proposal, and the rest of the proposal includes statements such as this:RECOGNIZING That many nations participate and run Lacrosse, Football, Baseball tournaments on threads.

by Saltha » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:42 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:27 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Simone Republic, States of Glory WA Office, Tinhampton, Walhistania, Witchcraft and Sorcery
Advertisement