Banning W.P Weaponry

[Ddreigiau]

I doubt he was planning on it. if he were to mention them, it would hurt his arguement, rather than help it.

[Holy Roman Confederate]

and he has already shown a clear lack of interest in backing up his argument with any studies or examples. This is him wanting to legislate his own personal feelings regardless of any logic.

[Grays Harbor]

[proposal=]NOTING That the vast majority of nations issue combat boots to their forces
FURTHER NOTING that said boots use laces
CONCERNED that these laces may cause tripping on the battlefield, resulting in possible disfigurement to the face
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use of laces to secure shoes to the foot of those in government employ.[/proposal]

You left out the part where if boots are hung up by their laces to dry, then there is the danger of somebody accidently strangling themselves on the laces. This cannot be tolerated.

[Glen-Rhodes]

OOC: Okay, perhaps the most irritating thing about this thread. The [proposal] tag is not how you propose something.

[New La Habana]

OOC: Okay, perhaps the most irritating thing about this thread. The [proposal] tag is not how you propose something.

OOC: I think that it was used for the effect of humour more than anything else.......

[Grays Harbor]

OOC: Okay, perhaps the most irritating thing about this thread. The [proposal] tag is not how you propose something.

OOC: I think that it was used for the effect of humour more than anything else.......

Ah, but some here have no discernable sense of humour. Sad but true.

[Glen-Rhodes]

OOC: I think that it was used for the effect of humour more than anything else.......

OOC: No, Stratskava has a habit of using it as if it's how you actually propose something.

[Charlotte Ryberg]

OOC: I think that it was used for the effect of humour more than anything else.......

OOC: No, Stratskava has a habit of using it as if it's how you actually propose something.

OOC: I have observed some ambassadors have confused the "proposal" tag as being part of the proposal syntax when it isn't.

[Great Nepal]

[proposal=]NOTING That the vast majority of nations issue combat boots to their forces
FURTHER NOTING that said boots use laces
CONCERNED that these laces may cause tripping on the battlefield, resulting in possible disfigurement to the face
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use of laces to secure shoes to the foot of those in government employ.[/proposal]

Nah first Bullets - if misfired they can kill inocent civlians...

"NOTING That the vast majority of nations use bullets in its armed forces.
FURTHER NOTING that bullets can miss the target.
CONCERNED that these bullets can hit innocent civilians.
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use of bullets in armed forces.

[Mikedor]

[proposal=]NOTING That the vast majority of nations issue combat boots to their forces
FURTHER NOTING that said boots use laces
CONCERNED that these laces may cause tripping on the battlefield, resulting in possible disfigurement to the face
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use of laces to secure shoes to the foot of those in government employ.[/proposal]

Nah first Bullets - if misfired they can kill inocent civlians...

"NOTING That the vast majority of nations use bullets in its armed forces.
FURTHER NOTING that bullets can miss the target.
CONCERNED that these bullets can hit innocent civilians.
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use of bullets in armed forces.

NOTING that many countries use weapons in their armed forces
FURTHER NOTING that weapons have been shown to kill people
CONCERNED at the deaths caused by said weapons
HEREBY PROHIBITS the use or possession or use of weapons by member nations

[Holy Roman Confederate]

To the OP, I find it funny you come into the WA and plead for the banning of several classes of weapons, yet looking in the SC section you post your military power. Thats general turd like behavior.