
by Congus » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:08 pm

by Brickilini » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:15 pm


by The Emmerian Unions » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:18 pm
Congus wrote:Is there a way to make it legal or is it flat out not a possibility?
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."


by The Emmerian Unions » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:57 pm
Brickilini wrote:Is it possible to draft a treaty of mutual support?
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."

by Flibbleites » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:10 pm

by The Emmerian Unions » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:15 pm
Flibbleites wrote:
It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."

by Enn » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:17 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:39 pm
Flibbleites wrote:It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."

by Enn » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:42 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Flibbleites wrote:It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."
I can imagine a type of WA peacekeeping force, based on a previous ruling. The World Assembly could declare various areas in need of peacekeeping, then pay nations who send out peacekeepers. We wouldn't be able to command them on the ground, though.

by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:16 am
Enn wrote:I would imagine the exact writing of this into a proposal would be what Flib meant by "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."

by GeneralHaNor » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:30 am
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by James Bluntus » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:00 am
GeneralHaNor wrote:I hear alot about compliance, but after reading every single resolution that hasn't been repealed, I see no mention of gnomes, or ministries of compliance anywhere
Maybe I'm mistaken, but if someone could point this out to me.

by GeneralHaNor » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:10 am
James Bluntus wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:I hear alot about compliance, but after reading every single resolution that hasn't been repealed, I see no mention of gnomes, or ministries of compliance anywhere
Maybe I'm mistaken, but if someone could point this out to me.
It's in the FAQ. However, let me give you a run down because you are new.
First off. Welcome to the game!!! I have been on here for about a year or so now.
With compliance, you don't have to do anything. It is automatic and you receive a telegram after a resolution has passed to inform you that laws have been enacted to comply with the resolution that has just passed. You have to comply with every resolution whether it applies to you or not.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:12 am

by Enn » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:44 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The idea of the WA Peacekeeping/Defense Force is illegal under proposal rules. I see the idea of peacekeeping but the WA has no authority to do so.
Flibbleites wrote:It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:21 am
Enn wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The idea of the WA Peacekeeping/Defense Force is illegal under proposal rules. I see the idea of peacekeeping but the WA has no authority to do so.Flibbleites wrote:It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."
You know better than Flib with his Mod Hat on now?


by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:53 am
Canadai wrote:You start wondering where the fuck we get this much money. How many dozens of committees, inspection teams, and compliance gnomes do we have?

by Flibbleites » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:54 pm
Enn wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The idea of the WA Peacekeeping/Defense Force is illegal under proposal rules. I see the idea of peacekeeping but the WA has no authority to do so.Flibbleites wrote:It might be possible but if it is, the difficulty would be right up there with an international currency proposal and trying to write a legal one of those was once described as "trying to navigate a mine field, on a pogo stick, drunk and blindfolded."
You know better than Flib with his Mod Hat on now?

by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:26 pm
Brickilini wrote:Is it possible to draft a treaty of mutual support?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement