
by Vitoriasa » Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:07 pm

by Holy Roman Confederate » Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:35 pm

by Quadrimmina » Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:38 pm

by Grays Harbor » Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:42 pm

by Bears Armed » Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:32 am

by Embolalia » Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:39 am
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by Vitoriasa » Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:14 pm
Embolalia wrote:What exactly constitutes a government organization? Does it have to be the Commonwealth government, or can it be delegated to our constituent country, county, or local governments? Are there any minumum standards for coverage, or could we simply put a couple Cénŷog into one precinct of the Caridd Fire, Police, and EMS Departments, without bothering with the rest of the Commonwealth?
And what does "permanently in operation" mean? Does that mean we can't close down precincts and departments that are no longer needed?

by Embolalia » Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:18 pm
Vitoriasa wrote:Permanently in operation means that they cannot take labor action. ie. They cannot go on strike, since they are mandated as an essential service.
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by Ille-Povrois » Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:46 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:45 am

by Flibbleites » Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:07 am
Bears Armed wrote:Category and strength?

by General-HaNor » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:10 am
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Libertarianism is not considered free enough by our standards.

by Magthere » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:18 am
Atomosea wrote:I swear, the only people more patriotic than Texans are Bostonians during a good season...

by Kryozerkia » Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:21 pm

by Flibbleites » Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:25 pm

by Quadrimmina » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:26 pm
Vitoriasa wrote:further MANDATES that organizations included under the act be permanently in operation

by Bears Armed » Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:40 am
Kryozerkia wrote:It seems it might fall under Social Justice...
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:54 am
DEFINES an essential service as a group or organization that is responsible for emergency response (Fire/Ambulance/Police)
).
by Bears Armed » Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:08 am

by Vitoriasa » Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:24 am
Essential Services Act
A resolution to ensure the availability of Essential Services
Category: Social Justice l Strength: Significant l Author: Vitoriasa
Description: The General Assembly,
NOTES that in the absence of funding, essential services become non-operational, closed, or abolished.
is ASTONISHED that many are seriously hurt, harmed, or injured due to the fact that emergency responses are slow or even non-existent.
Hereby
DEFINES for the purpose of this resolution, an essential service as an organization which ensures public safety by addressing various emergencies.
MANDATES that government organizations provide funding to all emergency-response organizations responsible for the public's safety within said nation
further MANDATES that organizations named under the act be invited to establish and maintain labor unions for said emergency organization
REQUIRES member Nation States to allow said labor unions the opportunity to voice concern, discontent, or praise

by Embolalia » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:40 pm
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by Flibbleites » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:42 pm
Vitoriasa wrote:MANDATES that government organizations provide funding to all emergency-response organizations responsible for the public's safety within said nation
further MANDATES that organizations named under the act be invited to establish and maintain labor unions for said emergency organization
REQUIRES member Nation States to allow said labor unions the opportunity to voice concern, discontent, or praise

by Embolalia » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:02 pm
Flibbleites wrote:Vitoriasa wrote:MANDATES that government organizations provide funding to all emergency-response organizations responsible for the public's safety within said nation
further MANDATES that organizations named under the act be invited to establish and maintain labor unions for said emergency organization
REQUIRES member Nation States to allow said labor unions the opportunity to voice concern, discontent, or praise
Aren't these clauses already covered by the WA Labor Relations Act?
That said, I think there is good reason section 4 was included in the LRA. Unionization of such essential services can arguably be a bad thing.4. RESERVES to the respective member nations the right to determine the extent to which the provisions of this resolution shall apply to members of the armed forces, law enforcement personnel, providers of emergency services, and government employees providing essential public services.
| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:34 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement