
by Totm » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:00 am

by The Emmerian Unions » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:03 am
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."

by The Emmerian Unions » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:46 am
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."

by The Voltania » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:10 am
| National anthem | First Minister: Alexander Morrice MP | Majority Party: Voltanian Progressives |
| Population (as according to my own stats): 5,092,415 | Constitution: In construction | Economy |

by Techno-Soviet » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:13 am

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:17 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:30 am

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:34 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure about this, honoured ambassador from Totm, but I know currencies cannot be abolished by the WA.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:43 am
Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure about this, honoured ambassador from Totm, but I know currencies cannot be abolished by the WA.
Surely, my dear Ambassador, if currencies may not be abolished, then the base purpose for their initial existence, ie the principle of money itself, is, itself, sacrosanct? Does this not, therefore, mean that the very idea is thoroughly unlawful?

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:45 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure about this, honoured ambassador from Totm, but I know currencies cannot be abolished by the WA.
Surely, my dear Ambassador, if currencies may not be abolished, then the base purpose for their initial existence, ie the principle of money itself, is, itself, sacrosanct? Does this not, therefore, mean that the very idea is thoroughly unlawful?
OOC: It's actually a technical limitation in which it is impossible to abolish currencies through a simple resolution.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:47 am
Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure about this, honoured ambassador from Totm, but I know currencies cannot be abolished by the WA.
Surely, my dear Ambassador, if currencies may not be abolished, then the base purpose for their initial existence, ie the principle of money itself, is, itself, sacrosanct? Does this not, therefore, mean that the very idea is thoroughly unlawful?
OOC: It's actually a technical limitation in which it is impossible to abolish currencies through a simple resolution.
Is his idea practicable, though, in any event? I don't see how it can be: if there's no money, save for his bloody key-things, then the only currency there can be is his key, isn't it? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:49 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Astralsideria wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure about this, honoured ambassador from Totm, but I know currencies cannot be abolished by the WA.
Surely, my dear Ambassador, if currencies may not be abolished, then the base purpose for their initial existence, ie the principle of money itself, is, itself, sacrosanct? Does this not, therefore, mean that the very idea is thoroughly unlawful?
OOC: It's actually a technical limitation in which it is impossible to abolish currencies through a simple resolution.
Is his idea practicable, though, in any event? I don't see how it can be: if there's no money, save for his bloody key-things, then the only currency there can be is his key, isn't it? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
A common currency is legal but extremely hard to accomplish and it has to allow member states to keep their own currency. Also, there cannot be any branding, even in the acronym.

by Sremski okrug » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:49 am

IC: The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.The IMF and World Bank are terrorist organizations.
"Our future destiny rests with us, sometimes this makes us afraid but then we remember we have Partisans blood and we know what we're here for. You can count on us" - Day of Youth
"We're Tito. Tito is Ours"

by Sebally-Orwitskia » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:52 am

by Embolalia » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:03 am

| /ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/ | My mostly worthless blog Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51 Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
|

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:52 am

by Astralsideria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:59 am
Sanctaria wrote:
Ah, my mistake. Well my point still stands. I worry about the intelligence of those who submit nonsensical proposals.

by Totm » Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:18 pm

by Totm » Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:24 pm
by Sanctaria » Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:25 pm
Totm wrote:Abolishing CapitalismA/B
I think we are known for having been around for what may seem like enternity but to put it rightly as fred once famously said.........and at some point i will remember
Firstly you must recognise i am not a man
Second SUCK my pOP is playing on the old television while i am on my watching through my telescope something moving around on the floor as i realise that i bad for me
Thirdly i will sue everybody in capitalism if you do not abolish capitalism there will be a grave misjustice
at the way i have been acting and move hestatanty again in proving capitilism to be wrong
Totm has been moving towards an all out war but they should hear the fights me and my sister get in too raunchy
SO as is so nothing new under the sun shall we all pick up the mirror on the floor
expecting to read my paper on ending capitlism and destroying a few states,call me?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement