NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] A Protection of Cyberspace

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Unibotian WA Mission
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 432
Founded: Oct 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] A Protection of Cyberspace

Postby Unibotian WA Mission » Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:32 pm

Here we go..

A Protection of Cyberspace
Category: International Security | Strength: Mild


The World Assembly,

Understanding that the internet is a virtual environment that is international, generally lacking the capacity for regulation and policing by one particular nation and is a dependency of many international communities and organizations to coordinate their affairs and better the world,

Recognizing that computer contaminants (which vary between harmless virtual poltergeists to malicious software) are created with the intent to destroy, frustrate, provide infamy to disrespectful people and in other cases to be a deplorable source of revenue,

Noting that while the capacity for regulation and policing of the internet is still controversial it is safe to suggest that few would prefer a world with computer contaminants than one without them,

Further Noting that if one nation has a lackluster security campaign against computer contaminants or even worse, promotes them, the genuine efforts for prevention in other nations are often negated either partially or wholly without some sort of harmonization among a good portion of internet provider hosts’ nations in regards to internet security,

Celebrating the efforts of other international organizations, nations, individuals and our own legislations in the past and present that have attempted to prevent the proliferation of computer contaminants or on a less related note, cyberterrorism,

Endeavoring to do our part to make the internet a better place too,

Hereby,

Defines computer contaminants as virtual corruptions that can be exchanged via the internet or electronic mail and are designed to infiltrate a computer system without the owner's informed consent -- computer contaminants may have the malicious intent to:
  • Destroy, control or reduce the technical efficiency of anything electronic;
  • Exploit and/or create security vulnerabilities;
  • Facilitate unauthorized access, or invade one’s privacy;
  • Propagate unsolicited advertising;
Clarifies that computer contaminants, for the purposes of this legislation, are created without any political intent and are not produced for political gain or to disseminate terror to a nation or a body of nations;

Outlaws the production and the informed harboring and spread of computer contaminants by any member-nation citizen or a user of an internet service provider that is based in a member-nation;

Demands that all member-nations must make a coordinated effort to prevent, detect and respond to the spread of computer contaminants at-least by their own member-nation citizens and by internet service providers that are based in their territory;

Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB) to communicate with other international organizations while also collecting its own data on emerging and existing computer contaminants, particularly the characteristics and the preferred method and strategies of prevention, detection and response;

Declares that all publications and findings of the 3WB be publicly available.
Last edited by Unibotian WA Mission on Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote: Look up to Unibot as an example.
Member of Gholgoth | The Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League (UDL) | Org. Join Date: 25/05/2008
Unibotian Factbook // An Analysis of NationStates Generations // The Gameplay Alignment Test // NS Weather // How do I join the UDL?
World Assembly Card Gallery // The Unibotian Life Expectancy Index // Proudly Authored 9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Commended by SC#78;

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Embolalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1670
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Embolalia » Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:53 pm

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB)

No. Keep the Security Council in the Security Council, thank you.

Furthermore, this seems like feel-good legislation to me. Given the incredible ease of information transfer between WA and non-WA nations, I don't think this will do anything at all.
Last edited by Embolalia on Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
Bible quote? No, that's just common sense.
/ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/
The United Commonwealth of Embolalia

Gafin Gower, Prime minister
E. Rory Hywel, Ambassador to the World Assembly
Gwaredd LLwyd, Lieutenant Ambassador to the World Assembly
Author: GA#95, GA#107, GA#132, GA#185
Philimbesi wrote:Repeal, resign, or relax.

Embassy Exchange
EBC News
My mostly worthless blog
Economic Left/Right: -5.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
@marcmack wrote:I believe we can build a better world! Of course, it'll take a whole lot of rock, water & dirt. Also, not sure where to put it."

User avatar
Hindopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 592
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hindopia » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:09 pm

It's a good proposal, and I can see nothing wrong with it at this time.

Ambassador James Vargas, for Hindopia
Playing NationStates since November 27, 2009
Back after a long hiatus

User avatar
Adamalk
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Aug 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Adamalk » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:39 pm

I think this is more of a proposal that belongs to the security section
-Adamalk

User avatar
Glen-Rhodes
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9027
Founded: Jun 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:46 pm

What exactly are you wanting to do, here? I can't tell if you're proposing the World Assembly assemble a database of malicious software, or if you're proposing nations themselves take over the responsibility of end-users installing antivirus software?

- Dr. B. Castro

User avatar
Embolalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1670
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Embolalia » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:50 pm

Ambassador LLwyd leans over to Dr. Catro and whispers, "if you ask me, he's trying to find a sneaky way of getting that 3WB/4th rule crap into a resolution. I don't think this is anything more than an excuse to use that acronym."
Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
Bible quote? No, that's just common sense.
/ˌɛmboʊˈlɑːliːʌ/
The United Commonwealth of Embolalia

Gafin Gower, Prime minister
E. Rory Hywel, Ambassador to the World Assembly
Gwaredd LLwyd, Lieutenant Ambassador to the World Assembly
Author: GA#95, GA#107, GA#132, GA#185
Philimbesi wrote:Repeal, resign, or relax.

Embassy Exchange
EBC News
My mostly worthless blog
Economic Left/Right: -5.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
Liberal atheist bisexual, and proud of it.
@marcmack wrote:I believe we can build a better world! Of course, it'll take a whole lot of rock, water & dirt. Also, not sure where to put it."

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:05 pm

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Noting that while the capacity for regulation and policing of the internet is still controversial it is safe to suggest that few would prefer a world with computer contaminants than one without them,


Exactly how much liberty does Your Excellency suggest sacrificing in the name of international security?

Celebrating the efforts of other international organizations, nations, individuals and our own legislations in the past and present that have attempted to prevent the proliferation of computer contaminants or on a less related note, cyberterrorism,


Your own legislation? Certainly Your Excellency must be referring to WA legislation, or is your government attempting to compel the Assembly to recognize its own greatness? And we will come back to the word "cyberterrorism" momentarily.

Defines computer contaminants as virtual corruptions that can be exchanged via the internet or electronic mail and are designed to infiltrate a computer system without the owner's informed consent -- computer contaminants may have the malicious intent to:Destroy, control or reduce the technical efficiency of anything electronic;


So, if the government sends an electronic patch to control electricity meters, is the government required not only to inform, but to actually get consent to do its job? Likewise, a government utility would be unable to remotely disconnect services to perform physical upgrades without the same?

Exploit and/or create security vulnerabilities;


Decent.

Facilitate unauthorized access, or invade one’s privacy;


Who gets to "authorize" remote access? Can the police, after having obtained the appropriate orders from a judge, remotely investigate a computer?

Propagate unsolicited advertising;


The WA needs to ban pop-up advertising? Is this really worthy of the Assembly's time?

Clarifies that computer contaminants, for the purposes of this legislation, are created without any political intent and are not produced for political gain or to disseminate terror to a nation or a body of nations;


Uh...I don't think that legislation can just *do* this. I mean, I could suggest a few extra hours of winter daylight per day in the North, but I can't just make it happen. Your Excellency cannot possibly believe that viruses and the like don't have any political motivation behind their creation, even "for the purposes of this legislation". You'd be laughed right out of the building!

Outlaws the production and the informed harboring and spread of computer contaminants by any member-nation citizen or a user of an internet service provider that is based in a member-nation;


I guess that the Intelligence Division would have to be based outside Krioval to continue...certain aspects of its work. If it is involved in such activities, that is.

Demands that all member-nations must make a coordinated effort to prevent, detect and respond to the spread of computer contaminants at-least by their own member-nation citizens and by internet service providers that are based in their territory;


Yeah...the Military Division too...maybe.

Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB) to communicate with other international organizations while also collecting its own data on emerging and existing computer contaminants, particularly the characteristics and the preferred method and strategies of prevention, detection and response;


Silly acronym aside, Excellency, exactly what information would this agency be empowered to collect, and why is the creation of another committee necessary in the first place?

Truth told, Excellency, Krioval is almost a fifth Scandinavian by origin, and we're some of the best hackers around - it's the lack of winter daylight I might have mentioned. We know network security. Aside from the strange and awkward definitions in this bill, this legislation really doesn't address improving security aside from telling nations to do...something? I'd like to support this, but at the same time, I and my fellow Kriovallers are not about to compromise the free flow of information in support of the creation of a silly committee with a silly name and a bunch of unfunded, vague mandates.

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Zarquon Froods
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: Oct 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Zarquon Froods » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:07 pm

It is very apparent to myself and others within my government that, given your recent exploits within these halls, your intent for writing this proposal, along with another you had recently submitted, is to insult the intelligence of the Ambassadors of this organization. We stand opposed to this measure and any other that seeks to control that which ought be unabated, or is otherwise outright ridiculous.

Good day,

Zarquon
Last edited by Zarquon Froods on Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Great Prophet Zarquon has spoken.

PROUD MEMBER OF ANTARCTIC OASIS
Champion of WA R36: Repeal "Veteran's Reform Act"

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:12 pm

Alas, World Wide Web is an RL violation. :(

Maybe try something else? GP RULES? AO SUCKS? R4 BLOWS? One of those ought to yield something of use.
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Glen-Rhodes
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9027
Founded: Jun 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:39 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Alas, World Wide Web is an RL violation. :(

OOC: Is it really? There is an Internet in the World Assembly universe, so it follows that there would be a World Wide Web. :? Though, who still uses that term, anymore?

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:50 pm

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Alas, World Wide Web is an RL violation. :(

OOC: Is it really? There is an Internet in the World Assembly universe, so it follows that there would be a World Wide Web. :? Though, who still uses that term, anymore?


OOC: People who want to create ridiculous backronyms?

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:10 pm

The Republic of Quadrimmina has legally defined the Internet as the series of interconnected computers and servers that together create a web, called the World Wide Web. Therefore, it is not a RL violation.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:52 pm

Yeah, and my country has NS versions of CNN and Fox News. Can we use those in proposals now too? :roll:
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Hiriaurtung Arororugul
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 466
Founded: Mar 03, 2009
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Hiriaurtung Arororugul » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:59 pm

After a long absence, Hiriaurtung Arororugul pilots the Mean Old Dirigible™ into the General Assembly chamber. He locates the Unibotian delegation and addresses them with a bullhorn.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB)


Leave that in there and I will personally lobby against this legislation. In fact, I will have a flashing neon sign affixed to the side of the dirigible proclaiming "Just Say No To Unibotism".
Hiriaurtung Arororugul
WA Ambassador
The People of Aundotutunagir

WARNING! This account only posts in-character and will treat all posts directed at it as in-character as well.

User avatar
Glen-Rhodes
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9027
Founded: Jun 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Glen-Rhodes » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:19 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Yeah, and my country has NS versions of CNN and Fox News. Can we use those in proposals now too? :roll:

Those are real-life US television channels, not a mass, generic world-wide network. We already have the Internet enshrined in multiple resolutions. The 'World Wide Web' is the collection webpages delivered by the Internet. I don't think any mod would say using WWW in a resolution is a real-world violation.

User avatar
Linux and the X
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5481
Founded: Apr 29, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Linux and the X » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:51 am

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Recognizing that computer contaminants (which vary between harmless virtual poltergeists to malicious software) are created with the intent to destroy, frustrate, provide infamy to disrespectful people and in other cases to be a deplorable source of revenue,

Or for research.

Defines computer contaminants as virtual corruptions that can be exchanged via the internet or electronic mail and are designed to infiltrate a computer system without the owner's informed consent -- computer contaminants may have the malicious intent to...

"May" have malicious intent? So you're implying that, if somebody writes a computer virus without malicious intent, that it should still be against the law? Are you trying to outlaw computer science, the study of which often includes writing (but not distributing) computer viruses?

Outlaws the production and the informed harboring and spread of computer contaminants by any member-nation citizen or a user of an internet service provider that is based in a member-nation;

Informed harbouring? Are you trying to ban anti-virus research, which involves keeping a copy to study? Are you trying to ban my aquarium replacement?

Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB) to communicate with other international organizations while also collecting its own data on emerging and existing computer contaminants, particularly the characteristics and the preferred method and strategies of prevention, detection and response;

I assume, then, that as long as I don't use HTTP to distribute a virus it would be allowed? In any case, it would make more sense to call it 'W3B' (OOC: as it would reflect RL conventions).
If you see I've made a mistake in my wording or a factual detail, telegram me and I'll fix it. I'll even give you credit for pointing it out, if you'd like.
BLUE LIVES MURDER

[violet]: Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Me, responding to a request to vote for a liberation: But... but that would blemish my near-perfect history of spitefully voting against anything the SC does!
Farnhamia: That is not to be taken as license to start calling people "buttmunch."

GPG key ID: A8960638 fingerprint: 2239 2687 0B50 2CEC 28F7 D950 CCD0 26FC A896 0638

they/them pronouns

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:41 am

Okay I'll address you're concerns when I get back from camping with edits,

Krioval wrote:
Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Noting that while the capacity for regulation and policing of the internet is still controversial it is safe to suggest that few would prefer a world with computer contaminants than one without them,


Exactly how much liberty does Your Excellency suggest sacrificing in the name of international security?


What liberties I remove in the proposal, your Excellency.

Celebrating the efforts of other international organizations, nations, individuals and our own legislations in the past and present that have attempted to prevent the proliferation of computer contaminants or on a less related note, cyberterrorism,


Your own legislation? Certainly Your Excellency must be referring to WA legislation, or is your government attempting to compel the Assembly to recognize its own greatness? And we will come back to the word "cyberterrorism" momentarily.


That would be a typo, your excellency. But I'll get on that in due time.

Defines computer contaminants as virtual corruptions that can be exchanged via the internet or electronic mail and are designed to infiltrate a computer system without the owner's informed consent -- computer contaminants may have the malicious intent to:Destroy, control or reduce the technical efficiency of anything electronic;


So, if the government sends an electronic patch to control electricity meters, is the government required not only to inform, but to actually get consent to do its job? Likewise, a government utility would be unable to remotely disconnect services to perform physical upgrades without the same?


Hhhm, I may need to make an except for governments merely to control owner's electronics without necessarily their consent, however in your example, all you'd have to is include a consent clause within the legalese that one signs. Also, do people actually own their electricity meters? Service providers typically own electricity meters, and it would be a good idea for the government to contact service providers and get the consent of service providers before uploading any electronic patches.

Facilitate unauthorized access, or invade one’s privacy;


Who gets to "authorize" remote access? Can the police, after having obtained the appropriate orders from a judge, remotely investigate a computer?


I believe we have a Right to Privacy act, but without checking it to seek out duplications, I'll probably be including a clause to suggest that governments have the capacity to be exempt from this law if they're conducting a legitimate political investigation.

Propagate unsolicited advertising;


The WA needs to ban pop-up advertising? Is this really worthy of the Assembly's time?


Adware was what I was concerned with, actually.
Clarifies that computer contaminants, for the purposes of this legislation, are created without any political intent and are not produced for political gain or to disseminate terror to a nation or a body of nations;


Uh...I don't think that legislation can just *do* this. I mean, I could suggest a few extra hours of winter daylight per day in the North, but I can't just make it happen. Your Excellency cannot possibly believe that viruses and the like don't have any political motivation behind their creation, even "for the purposes of this legislation". You'd be laughed right out of the building!


It would be better to clarify that this resolution focusing on computer contaminants that aren't created with a political goal in mind. Unless someone else can get confirm (or I will when I get back) that the cyberterrorism program is concerning computer containment even of political motivation.

Outlaws the production and the informed harboring and spread of computer contaminants by any member-nation citizen or a user of an internet service provider that is based in a member-nation;


I guess that the Intelligence Division would have to be based outside Krioval to continue...certain aspects of its work. If it is involved in such activities, that is.


Yes, of course. Thanks for the reminder that I need a spirit clause to ensure nations don't attempt to circumvent by moving their operations elsewhere.

Demands that all member-nations must make a coordinated effort to prevent, detect and respond to the spread of computer contaminants at-least by their own member-nation citizens and by internet service providers that are based in their territory;


Yeah...the Military Division too...maybe.


Okay I'll add that, although I always assumed militarys were affiliated with their nations.
Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB) to communicate with other international organizations while also collecting its own data on emerging and existing computer contaminants, particularly the characteristics and the preferred method and strategies of prevention, detection and response;


Silly acronym aside, Excellency, exactly what information would this agency be empowered to collect, and why is the creation of another committee necessary in the first place?


We might not actually need the creation of a committee, in hindsight, all we need is for member-nations to make an effort to contact other member-nations and international organizations if possible to ensure that the data on emerging and existing computer contaminants, particularly the characteristics and the preferred method and strategies of prevention, detection and response are developed.

I and my fellow Kriovallers are not about to compromise the free flow of information in support of the creation of a silly committee with a silly name and a bunch of unfunded, vague mandates.


That's what I don't like about it. I'll get back to you on this when I return.
Last edited by Unibot on Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:51 am

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Yeah, and my country has NS versions of CNN and Fox News. Can we use those in proposals now too? :roll:

OoC: Arent things in RL RP'd all the time. LIke nukes and war? Hell, even using the English language could be an RL violation. If your country happens to have news stations named Fox News and CNN, then it's fine. But still, putting them into a proposal would probably constitute a branding violation.
Last edited by Quadrimmina on Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
Astralsideria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1978
Founded: Mar 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Astralsideria » Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:59 am

His Most Serene Majesty's Governments approve of this legislation, but wish to suggest one possible amelioration. At the moment, part of the Bill reads:

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Noting that while the capacity for regulation and policing of the internet is still controversial it is safe to suggest that few would prefer a world with computer contaminants than one without them,


We suggest that, instead, the following might be clearer

Noting that, while the capacity for the regulation and policing of the Internet is still controversial, it is safe to suggest that a world without computer contaminants would be preferred by many or all to a world with them,
(Suggestion in red)

HMSMG has not yet authored a resolution of its own, and has no knowledge of whether this is more acceptable, but it was felt that the suggestion should be made. Thank you.
Vive la Sidéraure • Long live Astralsideria
AMOM's view: http://209.85.48.11/14831/181/emo/terrrrrrrrrize.png
Nobody does it better than Unicef: http://www.unicef.org/
« Quand on me dit, le capitalisme n'aime pas les pauvres, je réponds, c'est vrai, nous voulons en faire des riches. »

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:19 am

Unibot wrote:What liberties I remove in the proposal, your Excellency.


Please call me Henrik. I try to avoid unnecessary formality, when possible. Ultimately it will depend on the final text, but I am concerned with any proposal that seeks to limit what can and cannot be done electronically, especially if that proposal is not extraordinarily clear on its intent and procedure.

That would be a typo, your excellency. But I'll get on that in due time.


Good to hear.

Hhhm, I may need to make an except for governments merely to control owner's electronics without necessarily their consent, however in your example, all you'd have to is include a consent clause within the legalese that one signs. Also, do people actually own their electricity meters? Service providers typically own electricity meters, and it would be a good idea for the government to contact service providers and get the consent of service providers before uploading any electronic patches.


If I have sexual relations with another, it is hardly automatic invitation to do so in the future. Likewise, I do not like the idea of "blanket consent" buried in legalistic jargon. It dilutes the idea of informed consent almost to meaninglessness. People should be aware of what they are agreeing to do without the need to read a document several times or obtain legal advice.

I believe we have a Right to Privacy act, but without checking it to seek out duplications, I'll probably be including a clause to suggest that governments have the capacity to be exempt from this law if they're conducting a legitimate political investigation.


I think a better term would be "legal investigation". "Political investigation" sounds a bit inappropriate.

Adware was what I was concerned with, actually.


But that is not what the proposal says. It would eliminate any unsolicited advertising, and let's face it, most advertising is unsolicited.

It would be better to clarify that this resolution focusing on computer contaminants that aren't created with a political goal in mind. Unless someone else can get confirm (or I will when I get back) that the cyberterrorism program is concerning computer containment even of political motivation.


...wait a second. There's already a resolution that deals with this issue? (sigh) This is what happens when you're new, isn't it? Sort of a "let's see if Henrik knows his WA resolutions" sort of thing? All right. I admit it. I haven't memorized them yet. Feel free to withdraw this duplicate proposal and I'll buy you a drink at the Strangers' Bar. I feel a little silly at my point-by-point critique now.

Henrik Søgård
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philimbesi » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:33 am

Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB)


oh no did we stop paying attention to Uni again... who's job was is to entertain him... who's got the shiny thing?

Why would we create a 3WB when we know full well the gnome who organized it is just going to quit the committee when things don't go his way.
Last edited by Philimbesi on Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Flibbleites
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6569
Founded: Jan 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Flibbleites » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:42 am

Unibotian WA Mission wrote:Establishes the World Wide Web Bulwark (3WB)

I see this as falling into the same category as the "UNIBOT" acronym, that is the illegal branding category.

User avatar
Linux and the X
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5481
Founded: Apr 29, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Linux and the X » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:49 am

(OOC: What is the 3WB in regards to the (in)security council?)
If you see I've made a mistake in my wording or a factual detail, telegram me and I'll fix it. I'll even give you credit for pointing it out, if you'd like.
BLUE LIVES MURDER

[violet]: Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Me, responding to a request to vote for a liberation: But... but that would blemish my near-perfect history of spitefully voting against anything the SC does!
Farnhamia: That is not to be taken as license to start calling people "buttmunch."

GPG key ID: A8960638 fingerprint: 2239 2687 0B50 2CEC 28F7 D950 CCD0 26FC A896 0638

they/them pronouns

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Krioval » Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:31 am

Linux and the X wrote:(OOC: What is the 3WB in regards to the (in)security council?)


OOC: It refers to an organization called the Third Wall Bloc, which organized in opposition to the (new) 4th rule governing Security Council proposals. I believe that they have a subforum on The West Pacific's region forum, and there were several threads in which they were a strong presence in the Security Council forum (here on NS).

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:33 am

I was thinking while I was reading this thread. Would it be a good idea to start a W3C/ISO-like consortium that establishes web standards? I don't think we need to be too protectionist in my opinion.

Just some expansion ideas here.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads