
by Opiachus » Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:45 pm

by Quadrimmina » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:04 pm

by Opiachus » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:08 pm

by Quadrimmina » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:09 pm
Opiachus wrote:Thank you for pointing that out. Hopefully another resolution that I have planned will be unique.

by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:25 pm
Opiachus wrote:Thank you for pointing that out. Hopefully another proposal that I have planned will be unique.

by Unibot » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:31 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Opiachus wrote:Thank you for pointing that out. Hopefully another proposal that I have planned will be unique.
Don't give up! Repeal the failure of a resolution and write a better one. This proposal already has something more than the other one did: it doesn't discriminate against immigrants.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.

by Quadrimmina » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:44 pm
Unibot wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:Opiachus wrote:Thank you for pointing that out. Hopefully another proposal that I have planned will be unique.
Don't give up! Repeal the failure of a resolution and write a better one. This proposal already has something more than the other one did: it doesn't discriminate against immigrants.
Actually GR, if you defined a "Citizen" as any inhabitant in your nation, you'd have to provide an education to immigrants too.

by Bromin » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:52 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:00 pm
Unibot wrote:Actually GR, if you defined a "Citizen" as any inhabitant in your nation, you'd have to provide an education to immigrants too.
Quadrimmina wrote:Citizen is pretty implicitly defined as a person who has a passport or other document identifying them as a "citizen".
by Charlotte Ryberg » Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:25 am

by Quelesh » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:32 am

by Quadrimmina » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Unibot wrote:Actually GR, if you defined a "Citizen" as any inhabitant in your nation, you'd have to provide an education to immigrants too.
The resolution shouldn't have used the term at all. Crackpot ideas that nations would send troves of immigrants to a nation to receive an education, as an economic attack no less, were frankly the most idiotic thing I've ever read in a debate.Quadrimmina wrote:Citizen is pretty implicitly defined as a person who has a passport or other document identifying them as a "citizen".
Citizenship confers privileges, duties, and responsibilities. Being able to obtain a passport is a privilege of citizenship. According to the resolution in question, education is merely a privilege of citizenship, rather than a right of all people.

by Glen-Rhodes » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:26 am
Quadrimmina wrote:Sir, I know. My esteemed colleague from Unibot pointed out the elasticity of the definition of "citizen", something I felt needed to be addressed. At the same time, passports are what identify one, almost universally, as a citizen.

by Quadrimmina » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:53 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Quadrimmina wrote:Sir, I know. My esteemed colleague from Unibot pointed out the elasticity of the definition of "citizen", something I felt needed to be addressed. At the same time, passports are what identify one, almost universally, as a citizen.
I didn't mean to sound like I was arguing with you; just using your comment as a platform. Maybe using the privilege argument would be a bit more effective in a repeal. Though, I still have other ideas for addressing the problem.

by Opiachus » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:00 pm
Quelesh wrote:*ahem*
No to compulsory schooling in the World Assembly. No.
Besides, Quelesh has gotten along just fine for decades now without any kind of age-stratified education system, and you would seek to suddenly force that upon us too?
No.
Alexandria Yadoru
Interim Ambassador to the World Assembly
Empire of Quelesh

by Opiachus » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:01 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:The duplication aisde, we note that not all member states may have graded education. Again, we think Glen-Rhodes' proposal is much better yet we value the input from Opiachus.
by Sanctaria » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:04 pm
Opiachus wrote:Well, you could always resign from the WA if you don't like it. Then sign up after it is passed. And I think we all know that education would represent a better future for your country.

by Opiachus » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:06 pm
Sanctaria wrote:Opiachus wrote:Well, you could always resign from the WA if you don't like it. Then sign up after it is passed. And I think we all know that education would represent a better future for your country.
Just on a point of information, no matter when you join the WA, all of it's passed resolutions are binding law. As such, it wouldn't matter if Quelesh resigned before this came to a vote and then rejoined after it passed, this would still affect that nation.
Yours.,

by Opiachus » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:07 pm
by Sanctaria » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:15 pm

by Quelesh » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:18 pm
Opiachus wrote:Quelesh wrote:*ahem*
No to compulsory schooling in the World Assembly. No.
Besides, Quelesh has gotten along just fine for decades now without any kind of age-stratified education system, and you would seek to suddenly force that upon us too?
No.
Alexandria Yadoru
Interim Ambassador to the World Assembly
Empire of Quelesh
Well, you could always resign from the WA if you don't like it. Then sign up after it is passed. And I think we all know that education would represent a better future for your country.
As for the repeal attempt, That sounds like a good idea. I'll work on it.

by Aven Dale » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:26 pm

by Linux and the X » Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:04 am
Sanctaria wrote:Opiachus wrote:Well, you could always resign from the WA if you don't like it. Then sign up after it is passed. And I think we all know that education would represent a better future for your country.
Just on a point of information, no matter when you join the WA, all of it's passed resolutions are binding law. As such, it wouldn't matter if Quelesh resigned before this came to a vote and then rejoined after it passed, this would still affect that nation.
Yours.,
Opiachus wrote:And it's not like education is bad, is it?

by Bears Armed » Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:13 am
Opiachus wrote:Category: Education and Creativity
Area of Affect: Educational
Name: Mandatory Grade Education
_________________________________
UNDERSTANDING that third-world nations

by Volrickk » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:54 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Unibot wrote:Actually GR, if you defined a "Citizen" as any inhabitant in your nation, you'd have to provide an education to immigrants too.
The resolution shouldn't have used the term at all. Crackpot ideas that nations would send troves of immigrants to a nation to receive an education, as an economic attack no less, were frankly the most idiotic thing I've ever read in a debate.Quadrimmina wrote:Citizen is pretty implicitly defined as a person who has a passport or other document identifying them as a "citizen".
Citizenship confers privileges, duties, and responsibilities. Being able to obtain a passport is a privilege of citizenship. According to the resolution in question, education is merely a privilege of citizenship, rather than a right of all people.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement