
Advertisement

by Manticore Reborn » Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:32 pm
Wiztopia wrote:If it wasn't passed before what makes you think it will get passed now? Especially so soon after the other one was soundly defeated.

by Mysterious Nation » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:20 pm
Quadrimmina wrote:HOWEVER, NOTING that mandation of funding of research will lead to other, equally promising sciences to be ignored.
Quadrimmina wrote:RESPECTING the freedom of nations to appopriate money as they see fit.

by Quadrimmina » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:50 am
Mysterious Nation wrote:Quadrimmina wrote:HOWEVER, NOTING that mandation of funding of research will lead to other, equally promising sciences to be ignored.
While no commitees were established to whittle away national funds on stem cell research, the fact remains that nations MUST allow research on the topic to occur and for that to happen scientists require money to do their research. Alot of that money, in many nations, come from government research grants etc and with the resolution in question in play most of that money will be going toward stem cell research rather then other avenues of research merely due to the promotion of and potentially false build up of stem cells as a magical cure to all the worlds woes that resolution #49 helps to build.Quadrimmina wrote:RESPECTING the freedom of nations to appopriate money as they see fit.
:\ This does seem a tad NatSov-ey.
But other then that I believe we know where the government of Mysterious Nation stands in regards to "Stem Cells for Greater Health".
We do wonder if this draft is perhaps too short though?

by Mysterious Nation » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:12 pm

by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:37 pm

by Quadrimmina » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Glen-Rhodes voted against 'Stem Cells for Greater Health' because it allowed nations to ban the use of embryonic stem cells in research and practice. Our view was the resolution did absolutely nothing to advance that area of science, and in fact paved the road for nations to completely cast it into darkness. It praises the potential uses of stem cells, then advocates a ban of the most useful kind. That, in my opinion, is a far more convincing argument than funding priorities.
- Dr. B. Castro
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement