
by Bergnovinaia » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:00 pm

by Hirota » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:11 pm

by Enn » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:08 pm
Jazan wrote:certain kinds of harmful genetic engineering

by Bergnovinaia » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:11 pm

by Bears Armed » Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:32 am

by Intellect and the Arts » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:50 am

by Quadrimmina » Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:27 am

by Bergnovinaia » Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:03 pm

by Bergnovinaia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:56 pm

by Norstal » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:16 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Bergnovinaia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:20 pm
Norstal wrote:Some ideas off the top of my head:
Electronic Media Copyright Protection
Oceanography Research in International Waters (includes deep sea ravines)
Illegal mining prohibition, including using resources from such things
An act that establishes international standards for broadcasting formats
An act that establishes a committee that decides if a media content is suitable for minors
I suspect that some of them, if not all, have been made.

by Mousebumples » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:51 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:Norstal wrote:Some ideas off the top of my head:
Electronic Media Copyright Protection
Oceanography Research in International Waters (includes deep sea ravines)
Illegal mining prohibition, including using resources from such things
An act that establishes international standards for broadcasting formats
An act that establishes a committee that decides if a media content is suitable for minors
I suspect that some of them, if not all, have been made.
The last part is true... a lot of those are already covered.

by Unibot » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:17 pm
Oceanography Research in International Waters (includes deep sea ravines)
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.

by Bergnovinaia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:46 pm

by Manticore Reborn » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:06 am

by Bears Armed » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:11 am

by Bergnovinaia » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:27 am
Manticore Reborn wrote:I've seen some attempts to bring Good Samaritan laws to the floor


by Grays Harbor » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:58 pm


by Kryozerkia » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:02 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Here's an idea.... When some nation, who can't be bothered to read either the rules or previously passed resolutions submits a proposal which is either a duplicate, bloody stupid, or both... instead of vilifying them, or having an attempt at an SC "condemn", why not just whack them with a fish until they understand? Trout for thir first offense, halibut for their second and sturgeon for their third. After that, just coat them in chicken fat and toss them into the shark tank.

by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:05 pm

by Randur » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:06 pm
Bears Armed wrote:
OOC: Selective breeding of organisms that have various genetic defects is already practiced in RL as a way of studying those defects and developing treatments for them, and genetically engineering strains of [non-sapient] species to study defects that don't occur naturally in them but do in more highly valued species would seem a logical extension of this, so I suggest that any such ban should be applied only to engineering such strains from sapient & semi-sapient species... although then, of course, you'd have to define those terms...
Hr'rmm, maybe it's time for another go at requiring that all WA member nations treat all sapient beings/species as 'Human' for the purpose of 'Human Rights' legislation except if & when there are genuinely 'fair' reasons for not doing so? I'll have to dig out my copy of the old St Edmundan draft on that topic, and thank you for the reminder.


by Intellect and the Arts » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:48 pm
Randur wrote:Bears Armed wrote:Hr'rmm, maybe it's time for another go at requiring that all WA member nations treat all sapient beings/species as 'Human' for the purpose of 'Human Rights' legislation except if & when there are genuinely 'fair' reasons for not doing so? I'll have to dig out my copy of the old St Edmundan draft on that topic, and thank you for the reminder.
But what of the non-human species? Shall you put limits upon them?

by Manticore Reborn » Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:44 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Here's an idea.... When some nation, who can't be bothered to read either the rules or previously passed resolutions submits a proposal which is either a duplicate, bloody stupid, or both... instead of vilifying them, or having an attempt at an SC "condemn", why not just whack them with a fish until they understand? Trout for thir first offense, halibut for their second and sturgeon for their third. After that, just coat them in chicken fat and toss them into the shark tank.

by Manticore Reborn » Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:45 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement