Southrons United wrote:And of course will need a slightly more informative preamble.
but of course
Advertisement

by Eraplevok » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:25 pm
Freeoplis wrote:
We are amazed that the same answer which was expressed to this Nation has been quickly repeated to our esteemed colleagues from Charlotte Ryberg, we are appalled at such a lack of co operative debate from the delegation, with such an attitude shall bring with it defeat, that is for certain.

by Freeoplis » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:35 pm
Eraplevok wrote:Would you like the proposal to have a vague definition of bismuth?

by Eraplevok » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:00 pm
Freeoplis wrote:Eraplevok wrote:Would you like the proposal to have a vague definition of bismuth?
We would like an argument put forth as to why we or any other Nation should support such a proposal? why is Bismuth more important than any other element? as such that it needs to be singled out as an international issue? why is it deserving of it's own bureaucratic body in which salaries need to be paid?
Without adequate convincing answers support for this legislation will be lacking.

by Freeoplis » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:08 pm
Eraplevok wrote:Freeoplis wrote:Eraplevok wrote:Would you like the proposal to have a vague definition of bismuth?
We would like an argument put forth as to why we or any other Nation should support such a proposal? why is Bismuth more important than any other element? as such that it needs to be singled out as an international issue? why is it deserving of it's own bureaucratic body in which salaries need to be paid?
Without adequate convincing answers support for this legislation will be lacking.
If every element was included in this proposal, would the ambassador support it?

by Mousebumples » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:00 pm

by Sionis Prioratus » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:07 am
Besaba wrote:Sionis Prioratus wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:We find the scope to be a bit too narrow for our comfort. Should we also have a seperate resolution for each of the other 117 elements on the periodic table as well?
Resolutions about noble gases might be seen as too aristocratic.
*snip shit*
by Philimbesi » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:29 am
Our patience, while considerable,

by Bears Armed » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:29 am
Eraplevok wrote:Tell me what you think:
General Assembly
Social Justice
This proposal is for the equal distribution of Bismuth to those less fortunate.
Understands the those who work for their bismuth earn their bismuth
Concerned about the grand amount of individuals who fail to recognize what bismuth is
Concerned that those individuals that do not earn their bismuth don't have any
Concerned about the grand amount of individuals who have no bismuth in any shape or form
Hereby establishes the BEST committee (Bismuth Education and Sharing Team). This committee's purpose is to educate those about the dangers and benefits of Bismuth. The committe also encourages those with a fair amount of bismuth to share with others. Should those individuals not share, they will be tried and prosecuted in the ICC of resolution #102

by Freeoplis » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:27 pm

by Eraplevok » Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:04 pm
Freeoplis wrote:This delegation likes that our questions are blatantly ignored and another silly proposal fades into history.

by Freeoplis » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:55 am
Eraplevok wrote:well done sir, your incessant questioning and desire to know the truth was just to powerful for my weak proposal. Your great questions totally demolished any merit that was left in the Bismuth Articles. I have lost, you have won. Now, like you said, this proposal fades into history...

by Eraplevok » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:54 am
Freeoplis wrote:Eraplevok wrote:well done sir, your incessant questioning and desire to know the truth was just to powerful for my weak proposal. Your great questions totally demolished any merit that was left in the Bismuth Articles. I have lost, you have won. Now, like you said, this proposal fades into history...
It was your own making, a lack of answers to our questions caused the erosion of merit, proper scrutiny of proposals is not something we shall apologise for.

by Novus Niciae » Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:23 am

by Eraplevok » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:17 pm
Novus Niciae wrote:*walks in and looks at the paper being discussed*
What is this? Bismuth Articles?
I will have some of my aides look at this and I will get back to you in a month or two.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Princess Rainbow Sparkles
Advertisement