Url fixed.
Advertisement

by Bears Armed » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:09 am

by Hirota » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:10 am
Thanks for that.Bears Armed wrote:Url fixed.

by The Cat-Tribe » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:09 am
Neutonica wrote:As our poet laureate J. Hamilton Baker wrote,
"An endless peak is a plateau. An endless plateau is hell. And endless hell is sadomasochistic heaven."
Therefore, we regretfully must decline the offer of mandatory happiness, as it offends us with notions of sex and violence.
Dr. Isaac Corrigan
Delegate of Neutonica


by TailsPrower » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:59 pm

by The Cat-Tribe » Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:28 pm
TailsPrower wrote:I am going to have to say this proposal is rather silly and possibly ridiculous. For one thing there can never be a pure happiness. Another thing Happiness all the time is just to creepy hence the many videos made on "happy cities" the one I can say of the top of my head is a fairly odd parents episode and dima dome acres. This proposal is strongly idealistic and never be achieved. And finally I believe this will easily be broken once put in effect as it mostly goes against human nature, I feel, because a human cannot express one emotion all the time.

by Manticore Reborn » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:57 am
Grays Harbor wrote:"I don't believe there's a power in the 'verse that can stop some folk from being cheerful. Sometimes you just wanna duct tape their mouth and dump them in the hold for a month."

by Nullarni » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:09 am
Manticore Reborn wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:"I don't believe there's a power in the 'verse that can stop some folk from being cheerful. Sometimes you just wanna duct tape their mouth and dump them in the hold for a month."
![]()
![]()
![]()
Manticore Reborn moves that Grays Harbor should be declared the winner of this thread.

by The Most Glorious Hack » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:24 am

by Nova Mykenae » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:12 am


by Freeoplis » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:30 pm

by Grays Harbor » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:31 am
Freeoplis wrote:Is the author of this concerned about this proposal or just amused we're all responding to it?

by TailsPrower » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:39 pm
The Cat-Tribe wrote:TailsPrower wrote:I am going to have to say this proposal is rather silly and possibly ridiculous. For one thing there can never be a pure happiness. Another thing Happiness all the time is just to creepy hence the many videos made on "happy cities" the one I can say of the top of my head is a fairly odd parents episode and dima dome acres. This proposal is strongly idealistic and never be achieved. And finally I believe this will easily be broken once put in effect as it mostly goes against human nature, I feel, because a human cannot express one emotion all the time.
Pessimist.
An assassin clown will deal with you, Mr. Grumpy-pants!


by The Asylum Manager » Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:36 am
TailsPrower wrote:because a human cannot express one emotion all the time.

by Novus Niciae » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:33 am


by Darkridett » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:57 am

by East Ying » Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:20 am

by Linux and the X » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:45 am
Freeoplis wrote:Is the author of this concerned about this proposal or just amused we're all responding to it?
East Ying wrote:'Indeed. And who, exactly is going to terminate those who are unhappy? Furthermore, who is going to pay for those who are unhappy.
Excuse me if I am mistaken, but the WA is not allowed to directly take taxes from member states so a state-funded operation to terminate the unhappy would be impossible.

by TailsPrower » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:46 pm

by TailsPrower » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:47 pm
Linux and the X wrote:The WA can (and does) receive (not very) voluntary donations from member states. Besides, it is not considered a tax to mandate that states spend money.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Princess Rainbow Sparkles
Advertisement