Historic Day

by **Costada** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:42 am

Yesterday was truly a historic day in NationStates, for it was the day the 100th GA resolution was made into law. I say we make this a world holiday. Not out of law, but through ourselves. So let us commemorate June 15, 2010 as a historic day.

by **Nullarni** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:46 am

Perhaps not for all of NationStates, but definately for the WA. I support this idea.

100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals! :lol:

by **Charlotte Ryberg** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:57 am

Not to mention the fact that Ms. Harper had lobbied to let a new talent have the honour. I do appreciate the idea of a world holiday but it would have been metagaming as a resolution... but workable at least in roleplay.

Nullarni wrote:100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Hmm, there's still a few topics left to cover, honoured ambassador. Emptying the council of its resolutions would be detrimental to the community spirit of the GA.

by **Grays Harbor** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:08 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Not to mention the fact that Ms. Harper had lobbied to let a new talent have the honour. I do appreciate the idea of a world holiday but it would have been metagaming as a resolution... but workable at least in roleplay.

Nullarni wrote:100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Hmm, there's still a few topics left to cover, honoured ambassador. Emptying the council of its resolutions would be detrimental to the community spirit of the GA.

Perhaps, but it would also have the appeal of being beneficial to economies of nations by getting rid of some of the over-regulation.

by **South-Western Dakota** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:13 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Not to mention the fact that Ms. Harper had lobbied to let a new talent have the honour. I do appreciate the idea of a world holiday but it would have been metagaming as a resolution... but workable at least in roleplay.

Nullarni wrote:100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Hmm, there's still a few topics left to cover, honoured ambassador. Emptying the council of its resolutions would be detrimental to the community spirit of the GA.

Perhaps, but it would also have the appeal of being beneficial to economies of nations by getting rid of some of the over-regulation.

One hundred GA resolutions passed so far... that my friend is worrying, let me get my skinning knife.

by **American Capitalist** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:43 am

Sure why not although most of the honor and credit goes to the delegate from Charlotte Ryberg. I just came up with the idea and submitted it.

by **Quadrimmina** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:19 am

Our nation congratulates our esteemed colleagues for this day.

by **Costada** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:58 am

American Capitalist wrote:Sure why not although most of the honor and credit goes to the delegate from Charlotte Ryberg. I just came up with the idea and submitted it.

You are still a part of history, and for that you will never be forgotten by Costada.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:23 am

Nullarni wrote:Perhaps not for all of NationStates, but definately for the WA. I support this idea.

100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Beginning from the start, let us repeal GA #14! :lol:

by **Charlotte Ryberg** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:06 pm

Sionis Prioratus wrote:
Nullarni wrote:Perhaps not for all of NationStates, but definately for the WA. I support this idea.

100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Beginning from the start, let us repeal GA #14!

This, plus the Clean Water Resolution, honoured ambassador.

by **Glen-Rhodes** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:08 pm

Nullarni wrote:Now let get going on some repeals!

But.. but.. I'm no good at that stuff. :'( What am I supposed to do?

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:11 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:
Sionis Prioratus wrote:
Nullarni wrote:Perhaps not for all of NationStates, but definately for the WA. I support this idea.

100 resolutions! Now let get going on some repeals!

Beginning from the start, let us repeal GA #14!

This, plus the Clean Water Resolution, honoured ambassador.

Most definitely agreed, Your Excellency... We must... have... the fluoride! Our precious fluoride... [/drool]

Yours in watching too many Stanley Kubrick movies,

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:16 pm

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
Nullarni wrote:Now let get going on some repeals!

But.. but.. I'm no good at that stuff. :'( What am I supposed to do?

Maybe going after some other author?

:: Runs away ::

by **Glen-Rhodes** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:51 pm

Sionis Prioratus wrote:Maybe going after some other author?

:: Runs away ::

I never noticed that...

by **Quadrimmina** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:40 pm

Our nation recommends that, for the mutual benefit, we repeal GA#1.

by **Unibot** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:00 pm

I can't wait for the party when we pass GA#245 (or WA#245).

by **Charlotte Ryberg** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:06 pm

Quadrimmina wrote:Our nation recommends that, for the mutual benefit, we repeal GA#1.

To be honest, we could have had a bookkeeping resolution that established the GA and SC last year.

by **Freeoplis** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:09 pm

Why is resolution 100 important, sounds unimportant to this delegation.

by **Quadrimmina** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:11 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:
Quadrimmina wrote:Our nation recommends that, for the mutual benefit, we repeal GA#1.

To be honest, we could have had a bookkeeping resolution that established the GA and SC last year.

Perhaps...I wasnt there.

Freeoplis wrote:Why is resolution 100 important, sounds unimportant to this delegation.

It's because it is a fantastic milestone after the fall of the Bureaucracy That Must Not Be Named.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:14 pm

Quadrimmina wrote:Our nation recommends that, for the mutual benefit, we repeal GA#1.

There's a link for that! :twisted:

by **Freeoplis** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:14 pm

Quadrimmina wrote:It's because it is a fantastic milestone after the fall of the Bureaucracy That Must Not Be Named.

We would suggest the esteemed delegation re reads the 100 resolutions, they contain some of the most bureaucratic nonsense this delegation has ever come across, not something to be proud of but something that warrants immediate repeals.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:18 pm

Freeoplis wrote:
Quadrimmina wrote:It's because it is a fantastic milestone after the fall of the Bureaucracy That Must Not Be Named.

We would suggest the esteemed delegation re reads the 100 resolutions, they contain some of the most bureaucratic nonsense this delegation has ever come across, not something to be proud of but something that warrants immediate repeals.

In due time. All in due time.

by **Quadrimmina** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:23 pm

Sionis Prioratus wrote:
Freeoplis wrote:
Quadrimmina wrote:It's because it is a fantastic milestone after the fall of the Bureaucracy That Must Not Be Named.

We would suggest the esteemed delegation re reads the 100 resolutions, they contain some of the most bureaucratic nonsense this delegation has ever come across, not something to be proud of but something that warrants immediate repeals.

In due time. All in due time.

Our delegation was, of course, referring to the august body that predates the World Assembly. That rhymes with Punited Pations.

by **American Capitalist** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:39 pm

We could repeal World Assembly Headquarters and replace it with guidelines for more extravagant offices and meeting chambers. Of course we would need to submit both at the same time.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:52 pm

American Capitalist wrote:We could repeal World Assembly Headquarters and replace it with guidelines for more extravagant offices and meeting chambers. Of course we would need to submit both at the same time.

Why? We find the WA office of our Delegation to be quite adequate, thank you:

Yours,

Historic Day

Historic Day

Who is online