https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_pa ... l=1&id=744
Original debate: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=549866
Motivation
I opposed the original resolution and here's the repeal. My rationale was that this breaks the somewhat IC convention that technologies move ahead. Electric vehicles already account for sales of a majority of new vehicles in places I hang around most often (as of now anyway, I've moved cities a lot in recent years), and I don't expect to see catalytic converters on the roads soon.
The resolution was written without considering that the most expensive converters are now actually more expensive than the cheapest electric car, so the idea is rather pointless. (This varies by tax and subsidies, so the comparison is not apples to apples). But I consider the technology to have moved on (and if not, will move on in the next year or two), and so the idea of this resolution is rather daft.
- You have to be an extremely dry WA state for your catalytic converters to constantly catch fire, but it's possible depending on your RP. But it does happen in some US states. See for examples here:
https://www.ksby.com/news/2018/06/16/ho ... a-wildfire
https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/m ... tfire.html - See this article on the stealing of converters: https://www.vox.com/2023/5/20/23728557/ ... protection
- Ferrari F430, with a mind-popping $7,540 for two converters, is being compared in this resolution to the cheapest Chinese electric cars (BYD Seagull or Chang'an Lumin, US$7,500). It's not apples to apples, but you get my point.
The World Assembly,
Commending the target resolution for its noble aims to improve the environment through the compulsory installation of catalytic converters on internal combustion engines using gasoline or diesel;
Noting that more and more land vehicles in WA member states are powered by electric motors, hydrogen, solar, and other rapidly advancing technologies, and that internal combustion engines are an outdated technology that appears to be set for an inexorable trend towards irrelevance;
Flummoxed that the resolution fails to mention some of the harmful effects of catalytic converters, including that:
- The extreme heat of the converters can cause wildfires, especially in very dry areas in some member states, making the compulsory installation of catalytic converters across all member states, and the lack of exemption for member states suffering from extreme weather, rather problematic;
- Some WA states produce converters using expensive minerals such palladium, platinum, rhodium, or other rare earth metals, the mining of which creates pollution on its own;
- Some WA states suffer from significant levels of theft of converters, as some converters are installed on exhaust pipes and can be easily removed by criminal elements, at great loss to the owners of the vehicles as well as fostering petty crime and feeding cash to criminal elements;
- Some converters are extremely expensive, and the most expensive ones can be pricier than buying a new small electric vehicle in some WA states, depending on tax, installation, and service costs;
Expresses the opinion that the resources of WA states are better off promoting the use of more efficient vehicles, such as inexpensive and advanced electric vehicles, battery swapping and fast charging technologies, or other advanced forms of transport (or, for that matter, public transport) rather than in retrofitting old vehicles with converters, or to police against theft of converters;
Noting that a repeal of the target resolution does not prohibit individual states that are still reliant on internal combustion engines from implementing local measures to promote their use, or for users of (say) antique cars to reduce their cars’ pollution through retrospectively installing converters;
Hereby repeals the target resolution, GA#744, Catalytic Converter Implementation.