Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:09 am
Bananaistan wrote:Tigrisia wrote:If we read this correctly, the resolution lacks a clear obligation for member states to criminalize these actions. We therefore see the regulation as toothless and in its current state unnecessary. If that is changed, we support this resolution.
Apart from that, we would like to note that the definition of "in service" excludes certain time periods that are especially sensitive when it comes to compromises on safety, namely actions such as pre-flight checks or similar pre-flight tasks that are not loading or unloading passengers or cargo. Therefore, we would like to add that an aircraft "in service" includes all aircrafts that are undergoing immediate flight preparations.
For the Delegation of the Federal Republic of Tigrisia
Junior Consular Secretary Thandi Enfantia
"The combination "commits an offence" occurs seven times in the proposal. These things are adequately criminalised. Adding in some formula to the effect that member states must criminalise X, Y & Z would only use up space unnecessarily."
Just in case, I added the line
"Offence" means a criminal offence. All WA states are required to criminalise all of the offences stated below.
That's addressed to Tigrisia not Bananaistan.