Advertisement
by The Ice States » Wed Mar 27, 2024 10:40 pm
by Lieutenant Columbo » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:21 pm
Honest mistake, veracity (mischaracterisation of GA 660's provisions: member nations are not prohibited from conscripting people to service in combat roles; mere assertion of CO status is insufficient and accepting CO claims after investigation does not make it a volunteer position).
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:44 pm
Lieutenant Columbo wrote:Hey folks, this has been marked illegal for an Honest Mistake:Honest mistake, veracity (mischaracterisation of GA 660's provisions: member nations are not prohibited from conscripting people to service in combat roles; mere assertion of CO status is insufficient and accepting CO claims after investigation does not make it a volunteer position).
That first bit I understand, having gone close over 660 now. I shouldn't simply say that it bans conscription for combat roles, because it doesn't. Rather, it bans the conscription of conscientious objectors for those roles. That's what I don't get, is that Secretaries Imperium Anglorum and Desmosthenes and Burke seem to think it doesn't do that, either. I'm curious what GenSec thinks 660 does do.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement