Advertisement
by Unogonduria » Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:59 am
by Second Sovereignty » Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:03 am
Askrieg wrote:Secondly, many member nations have and will always exist, in a politically turbulent region. Excellent examples brought forth by delegates before me are Earth's South Korea and Israel.
by Cessarea » Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:04 am
Askrieg wrote:"Thirdly, the proposal also fails to mention that there are exemptions that apply when it comes to conscriptions. For example, for citizens that assisted in realizing the state's interests in the international theatre through non-military means, examples include but not limited to, scientifically; economically; or diplomatically; are exempt from involuntary military conscriptions. This example proves that there exists already mechanisms of which unwilling individual to be exempted from military conscriptions. This proves that member nations with involuntary military service is not omnipotent in forcing its' citizens to be drafted, and is willfully ignorant in its' citizens desires, and would rather exercise its' non-existent fascistic tendencies to line up its' adult citizens into the nearest boot camp. This resolution is unnecessary, if it is willing to characterize this point."
by United States of Republicana » Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:31 am
by Askrieg » Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:34 am
Cessarea wrote:Any given member nation is not obligated to provide such exemptions to military service, only being forced to respect Conscientious Objectors, and even then still being able to deploy them on military roles so long as they do not have to directly take up arms."
Second Sovereignty wrote:OOC:
A wildly reactionary government formed solely as a result of US intervention that spent no small part of its existence as a military dictatorship that slaughtered immense numbers of people on bare and arbitrary suspicion, and a literal apartheid state, are not the positive examples you think they are.
by Protzka » Tue Oct 03, 2023 11:45 am
by Second Sovereignty » Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:06 pm
Askrieg wrote:OOC: [...] Moreover, personal opinions aside, both of their government are against a literal fanatical states with even more extreme ideas of consequence if their people refuses their state wishes. Somehow, the governments' of South Korea and Israel have to be prepared against them.
by Cessarea » Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:37 pm
Askrieg wrote:Cessarea wrote:Any given member nation is not obligated to provide such exemptions to military service, only being forced to respect Conscientious Objectors, and even then still being able to deploy them on military roles so long as they do not have to directly take up arms."
"It proves," Dr. Daendels rose quickly, discreetly wiping pizza crumbs off of his tie, "That there are exemptions to these governments. This resolution relies on the premise that every government practicing forced service is doing so without other mechanisms that their citizens can take, which is simply not true. If passed, this resolution will affect all nations that are doing conscriptions right." Dr. Daendels relaxes, "Besides," he continued calmly "It's not like conscription continue for a long long time, it's not corporal punishment." he sits down, clearly looking for something around his aides, most likely his unfinished pizza.
by Kreigsreich of Iron » Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:40 pm
by Eakheoral » Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:43 pm
by Second Sovereignty » Tue Oct 03, 2023 1:07 pm
by Kreigsreich of Iron » Tue Oct 03, 2023 1:10 pm
by Herten » Tue Oct 03, 2023 2:35 pm
by The Ice States » Tue Oct 03, 2023 2:41 pm
Herten wrote:Furthermore, the concept of sovereignty is of paramount importance to us. We firmly believe that decisions regarding military service should be a matter of national sovereignty, not international prescription. Each country must retain the autonomy to determine its military service policies based on its specific circumstances, perceived threats, and the will of its citizens.
by Picairn » Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:07 pm
Second Sovereignty wrote:Askrieg wrote:OOC: [...] Moreover, personal opinions aside, both of their government are against a literal fanatical states with even more extreme ideas of consequence if their people refuses their state wishes. Somehow, the governments' of South Korea and Israel have to be prepared against them.
OOC:
This isn't NSG, and isn't the place for this debate, but, in the interests of education:In Korea, the conflict is between a former Military Dictatorship propped up by the US so as to prevent what was an at the time popular government from forming in Korea, operated by collaborators from the prior Japanese Fascist regime, vs. the aforementioned at-the-time popular government, which was subject to a genocidal bombardment campaign and countless slaughters of civilians, and is presently under one of the most extensive sanction regimes in the world, and ever on the edge of being invaded from the southern half of the country by a state backed by one of the most powerful and horrific imperial militaries in the world.
In Palestine, the conflict is between an explicitly genocidal colonial ethnostate, Israel, and a preexisting population of Palestinians who want to be able to live in their own goddamn country and be treated like human beings, rather than as outright sub-human. I don't particularly care to defend Hamas, the group which presently engages in much of the militarized resistance activity, but the side of Israel is fundamentally the side of apartheid and genocide.
This resolution, being, in a webgame, will affect neither of these countries in reality. But they do not serve as the positive examples you think they do.
by Second Sovereignty » Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:43 pm
Picairn wrote:Imagine being an apologist for North Korea's aggression in the Korean War. Disgusting. You should spend time reflecting on why you support murderous dictatorships.
by Picairn » Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:35 pm
Second Sovereignty wrote:OOC:
The last time I interacted with you, you made a bizarre and offensive sexual comment about me, and now you want to turn around take a moral high ground over some historical perspective?
Go someplace you're wanted, and leave me the hell alone.
by Askrieg » Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:46 pm
Cessarea wrote:
"I'm afraid, sir, that there is no right way to sanction conscription. No matter how you establish it, people who never asked for it will be sent to the frontlines and will be asked to shoot or die. All that, of course, at the threat of punishment back home. Or do you expect the obligatory side of conscription to never take effect? What do you believe are moral sanctions to issue against those who refuse to partake in conscription?" The Minister, theatrically tapped his chin, continuing. "Curtailing of political rights? What is that one phrase from that human science fiction movie again?" The Minister took a large stack of clipped-together papers from his desk and turned a page over, allowing all to read its title: "STARSHIP TROOPERS MOVIE SCRIPT". He analysed the paper, passing each word by with his index finger, until reaching at what he searched for. "Ah, here it is."
He harrumphed, despite having no need to clear his "throat", and announced in a bombastic narrator voice, eerily similar to one from a corny book adaptation/parody movie:
"SERVICE GUARANTEES CITIZENSHIP!" Oddly enough his voice sounded at least 4 times louder whilst saying that. Benefits of having an artificial voicebox, perhaps. He let go of the script and continued. "Humour aside, you must understand that allowing a State to impose service upon its citizens at risk of being treated as a second-class citizen or, arguably even worse, arrested is not desirable. I am not against citizens coming to the defence of a homeland they love, and a community they seek to protect, but it must be of their own free-will. Anything else is a dangerous precipice that authorises nations to send their young to die. There can be no ethical positive in allowing a State to threaten violence in order to force its citizens to commit violence on its behalf. And the alternative, removal of political freedoms or privileges, is just as bad. "
by Xolaya » Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:19 am
by Mechanocracy » Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:07 am
by Elyreia » Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:42 pm
by Cessarea » Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:10 pm
Elyreia wrote:“The Principality of Elyreia, after having seen the arguments made for both sides of the debate, and including historical analogies as well as taking into consideration prior legislation addressing parallel issues that this proposal seeks to bridge - as well as those statutes that enshrine the right to those issues as well as the one at hand - will formally place our stance on Opposition to the proposed amendments.
“One could make an argument that in some societies, the very concept of employment to afford things such as rent, utilities, or food could be considered “forced” upon the employee else they would face undue hardship without such incomes to afford living expenses. We see this no differently - there are plenty of options to avoid active military service already in place that to outright ban it’s use would be akin to arguing that capitalist economies should be banned for forcing people into employment to be housed, fed, and clothed. The right to a nation’s sovereignty and self-defense will always be at odds with one’s right to privacy and self-determination, but in this case there are alternatives that create ample opportunity to avoid the very thing this proposal seeks to ban.
“The only thing forced is that the citizen in question must be inconvenienced for a period of time, where they shall be provided food, housing, clothing, trade skills, and income in exchange for their time - not so different than any other form of employment.”
-Korus Vaelans
Āeksio of the Elyreian Foreign Corps
WA Delegate
Askrieg wrote:
Dr. Daendels' eyes narrows, apparently eyeing The Minister. In his heart, a familiar Askrieg envy grows. He longs to have that fantastic artificial voicebox. He rises once more.
"Minister, though we share interests in old-school film, it is seem we are at an impasse. The way i see it, through Askrieg history, it is much better to have the choice, shoot or die. Because the grim alternative is that we, along with our families and other citizens, will die. Askrieg in all its' history exist in a perpetual state of political tension. We have witnessed wars break of reasons as simple as the price of cheeses. It is imperative that every citizen of Askrieg is prepared of that.
Which brings me to my next point. The proposal also fails to mention that conscription ensures every citizen has at least basic knowledge and skill for national and self defense. We teach them how to shoot, how to fight, how to protect their families and loved ones. We develop their unit cohesion and brotherhood of arms. If our government falls, when social order is no longer, conscription gives them the skill to develop society from the ground up, and if they choose to, continue the fight and carry on.
Minister, i understand that we may not agree with each other. However you must understand the value that conscription brings. To take that away from the citizens of the world would simply not beneficial."
"Perhaps," the Doctor drops his shoulders and relaxes, "we can discuss the benefits of conscriptions further at a later time. Maybe you can bring that fabulous artificial voicebox of yours."
Dr. Daendels sits down.
by Elyreia » Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:27 pm
Cessarea wrote:"I will point out merely one thing, Delegate Korus." Began Minister Feathers-of-Burgundy in a weak voice, entering the room while sat on a hovering metallic chair, with couches and arms for his comfort. "The... graciousness of your nation in offering alternatives to military service is not mandated by World Assembly legislation. Some, Delegate, are very much interested in properly forcing their citizens into war. Being a Conscious Objectors is, unfortunately, not an easy matter, and many may simply be deemed to not have sufficient reason to avoid active combat roles. In the end, nations of the WA are authorised to send people who do not wish to fight into war."
The Minister floated around the room, willing his chair closer to his assigned Delegate's desk. With the bottom of his floating throne, he smashed the chair that stood in the way, and cursed his aide for not removing it as he had requested. Finally, he concluded:
"With that said, Delegate, this mere 'inconvenience' can and does cost lives. This inconvenience destroys families. This inconvenience provides marketable skills for dead bodies. Be thankful that your nation recognises the immorality of sending conscripts into real warfare, for that is not a clarity enjoyed by many nations of this Assembly." As he said that, he eyed around the room, silently judging the present Delegates.
"I'm afraid that my voicebox - and the rest of my body for that matter - is no longer quite impressive, Comrade. The doctors say it's fatigue - I frankly did not know Artificials could become fatigued. Neither did them, for that matter. Perhaps this Assembly has been trying my circuitry." He said, gently rubbing his neck as he did. Maybe his malfunction was not that unwelcome; Daendels' comments towards his voicebox had been... quite concerning.
"As for your arguments... offer voluntary training courses. None of what you described is exclusive to conscription. Does a nation need to force into service its citizens for the sake of 'preparing' them? If you find it absolutely necessary, instil obligatory training courses for citizens that have concluded General Education - or... I suppose one could call it High School? - so as to prepare them in the use of weaponry and on the ways of war. Obligatory service, however, is needless for the benefits you have described."
by New Sparkia » Thu Oct 05, 2023 10:24 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement