Wayneactia wrote:Daarwyrth wrote:Again, as it turns out, most nations in the WA don't perceive the target resolution to be harmful, or the flaws that we highlighted in this repeal proposal to be that big of a problem. That might have been why no one tried to put forward a repeal for MoMH before until now. Because the flaws are there, it's just a matter of opinion whether those flaws are perceived to be overly problematic or not. Apparently, most in the WA don't agree with how Roylaii and I perceived it.
Your opinion. Doesn't change mine.
Your opinion, in this case, seems to be based on your ability to read the minds of the two authors and tell them what their reasoning is, despite them putting forth three decent (But inadequate, IMO) reasons in their repeal and arguing for those three reasons. This attitude of yours is unreasonable.