Violation: Amendment/Contradiction
GAR#386 states under Article 2:
Expands the remit of the Global Emigration, Security, Travel And Passport Organisation, hereafter referred as the Passport Organisation, to include the issuance of World Assembly identification documents and passports to the former nationals of member states who have been deprived of their nationality by their government;
This violates the amendment/contradiction rule because it is attempting to expand upon a previously enacted resolution, GAR#76, "Standardised Passport Act". Link To Original Resolution: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=30&p=1639327&hilit=emigration#p1639327
Under GAR#76, it states:
FOUNDS the Global Emigration, Security, Travel And Passport Organisation.
a) This organisation will establish minimum requirements of details to be included into passports, including but not limited to passport numbers, facial representations of the owner, name, date of birth, validity, and anti-forgery features;
b) Members states are required to abide by these requirements.
Under GA proposal rules, it clearly states that:
Contradiction: From the verb 'to contradict' - to state opposite or deny a concept or idea. Proposals which conflict with explicit clauses within an active resolution will be removed.
If I understand this correctly, it is saying that if a resolution is to conflict with a clause within an active resolution, that said resolution will be removed. In this case, if GAR#76 is repealed successfully at ANY MOMENT, then every other resolution, including this one, that has no support standing and quotes the "Passport Organization" as GAR#386 does, will collapse, at least in the portion where it is mentioned. It will lead to a much easier repeal as well, even if it's not illegal, so either way, it may end up on the chopping block.
Furthermore, GA proposal rules clearly state that:
Amendments: A supplementary set of clauses that either enhance or modify an active proposal's text. Proposals cannot amend existing resolutions because the game's coding does not allow for it. To introduce new legislation, the active resolution must be repealed. This applies to appeals as well.
This means that GAR#386 is ILLEGAL because it is very clearly enhancing the powers of which the "Passport Organization" was originally established to have. This is all my evidence on this matter, I thank the World Assembly for considering my challenge.
