The Forest of Aeneas wrote:Withdrawn. Resubmission shortly, hopefully for the final time.
Resubmitted
Advertisement
by The Forest of Aeneas » Mon May 16, 2022 12:42 pm
The Forest of Aeneas wrote:Withdrawn. Resubmission shortly, hopefully for the final time.
by Fachumonn » Mon May 16, 2022 2:15 pm
The Forest of Aeneas wrote:The Forest of Aeneas wrote:Withdrawn. Resubmission shortly, hopefully for the final time.
Resubmitted
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon May 16, 2022 2:41 pm
Fachumonn wrote:The Forest of Aeneas wrote:Resubmitted
Lol this has been approved for the third time.
by Fachumonn » Mon May 16, 2022 2:55 pm
by WayNeacTia » Mon May 16, 2022 2:57 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Fachumonn » Mon May 16, 2022 3:22 pm
by WayNeacTia » Mon May 16, 2022 3:25 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Fachumonn » Mon May 16, 2022 3:26 pm
by Blaenavon » Fri May 20, 2022 1:26 am
by West Barack and East Obama » Fri May 20, 2022 2:40 am
by Fachumonn » Fri May 20, 2022 3:58 am
by Old Hope » Fri May 20, 2022 5:46 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.
by Orifna » Fri May 20, 2022 6:12 am
Bans member states from purposefully punishing, convicting, or otherwise targetting for punishment, any individual for:
Any act they did not personally commit or knowingly conspire, suppress evidence of, encourage, or facilitate; or
Connection or relationship to an individual, on the basis that that individual has committed a punishable or unlawful act;
Demands that all past convictions contravening this resolution by member states be fully rescinded; and
Clarifies that this resolution does not ban member states from purposefully punishing, convicting, or otherwise retaliating against persons for:
Membership in a proscribed organisation; or
A punishable act unambiguously committed under their authority.
by Equai » Fri May 20, 2022 6:20 am
EBN News: Romania Implements Trade Blockade on Equai Following Execution of Anton "Cezar" Neacsu
by Berenice Soviet » Fri May 20, 2022 11:57 am
by Equai » Fri May 20, 2022 12:19 pm
Berenice Soviet wrote:The Berenice Soviet votes AGAINST this proposed bill. Due to the inexperience and multiple redrafts, it seems that this should’ve been worked in prior to being posted. Regardless, this bill can cause a lot of problems. What about prisoners of war? Collective punishment is sometimes necessary to bring order to a group. Recall that in the class room, the teacher may punish the whole class if a few people messed up. This reinforces who is in charge and who is supposed to follow.
EBN News: Romania Implements Trade Blockade on Equai Following Execution of Anton "Cezar" Neacsu
by Berenice Soviet » Fri May 20, 2022 4:27 pm
Equai wrote:Berenice Soviet wrote:The Berenice Soviet votes AGAINST this proposed bill. Due to the inexperience and multiple redrafts, it seems that this should’ve been worked in prior to being posted. Regardless, this bill can cause a lot of problems. What about prisoners of war? Collective punishment is sometimes necessary to bring order to a group. Recall that in the class room, the teacher may punish the whole class if a few people messed up. This reinforces who is in charge and who is supposed to follow.
This problem, ambassador, can really easily be fixed if all hierarchical form and usage of punishments is abolished. People won't need to rebel when everyone is on equal stance as everyone else.
by Caymarnia » Fri May 20, 2022 6:03 pm
by The Forest of Aeneas » Fri May 20, 2022 7:20 pm
by Berenice Soviet » Fri May 20, 2022 8:24 pm
Caymarnia wrote:While I can understand the objections - the wording is very much open to interpretation, and I would not be in the least bit surprised if a repeal motion is being drafted in the event this resolution passes - I believe I can also understand the intent. Arresting the residents of an entire apartment block for the actions of a few who participated (actively or otherwise) in a crime is both asinine to undertake due to the inefficient use of police time, personnel, and equipment, and unfair to those residents who are simply going about their lives. Questioning is one thing, prosecution based on proximity is another.
As to the question of prisoners of war, I am not entirely certain what the ambassador from the Berenice Soviet is taking issue with. Unless I am mistaking the intent of the author, the resolution at vote is intended to deal with civil law, as regards to a nation's own citizens, whereas POWs are most likely subject to military law, and whatever specific World Assembly regulations regarding the application of said law (i.e. in the case of war crimes tribunals, which I'm reasonably certain cannot be done arbitrarily). In my view, being captured in battle and imprisoned until exchanged - or until hostilities cease - would be punishment enough. Trust me on that.
In accordance with this evening's vote of the National Council of the People's Will, Caymarnia votes for the resolution.
by Fremenilia » Sat May 21, 2022 7:39 pm
by Glatixland » Mon May 23, 2022 7:44 am
by Anarcho-Pablion » Mon May 23, 2022 9:17 am
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Don't have time to read all of it right now, but would this decriminalize the get-away car's driver's actions in, say, a bank heist? Driving a car is not a crime, after all.
by Fremenilia » Mon May 23, 2022 6:30 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement