NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Access To Euthanasia Services

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

[PASSED] Access To Euthanasia Services

Postby Apatosaurus » Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:48 pm

OOC: Hi, as per this announcement, I've made a variety of changes to the resolution for when it gets repealed. Feedback is appreciated :)

Aaaaand... this has now become GAR#598 "Access To Euthanasia Services" :D

Co-author: Imperium Anglorum

Character count: 4608

Whereas individuals should possess the right to end their life on their own terms if they are in unbearable agony, and

Whereas the supposed dangers of permitting access to assisted suicide do not outweigh the right to have a dignified death,

Be it enacted as follows:
  1. Let these terms be defined as follows for the purposes of this resolution:
    1. "Informed consent" is bona fide consent provided by an individual on their own free will to a medical procedure, where they are fully aware of what they are consenting to, all significant consequences, and any potential alternatives; the individual in question may withdraw such consent at any time, and this consent may also be provided conditionally.

    2. “Assisted suicide” is a medical procedure to directly, quickly, and painlessly end the life of a patient, where:
      1. the patient has provided informed consent to the procedure and method thereof, and

      2. the patient has an incurable physical condition that will directly result in their death in the foreseeable future, or directly and severely compromises their quality of life with no realistic prospect of improvement.
    3. An "eligible patient" is an individual who biologically can die and is able to receive assisted suicide as per 1b.i and 1b.ii.

    4. Assisted suicide services are "locally accessible" in a given area if any necessary travel to receive said services poses no substantial burden to quality of life, time, or finances to individuals in that area seeking such services.
  2. Member states must provide fully subsidised assisted suicide services to eligible patients within their jurisdiction. Member states must also arrange and provide fully subsidised travel to receive such services for any eligible patient in areas within their jurisdiction where such services are not locally accessible. All such services and travel must be at no monetary cost to recipients.

  3. If a member state demonstrates bona fide to the General Accounting Office that they are unable to fund Section 2 services and travel without causing serious damage to their economy or finances, that member state shall receive funds from the World Assembly General Fund assessed by the General Accounting Office to aid them in funding Section 2 services and travel. Member states may not use such funds for any purpose other than funding Section 2 services and travel.

  4. No member state may discriminate against any persons, or persons related thereof, for receiving, seeking, administering, or otherwise facilitating, assisted suicide or Section 2 services, in ways including but not limited to:
    1. tax discrimination by placing a higher burden of tax on said persons,

    2. prosecuting individuals, or individuals related thereof, for receiving, seeking, administrating, or otherwise facilitating, assisted suicide or Section 2 services,

    3. withholding any inheritance from the heirs of individuals due to said individuals having died by assisted suicide or Section 2 assisted suicide, or

    4. failing to provide equal protection before the law to said persons.
  5. No member state may implement any policy with a cognisable impact of hindering the ability of eligible patients to receive assisted suicide, unless that policy does not violate any other provisions of this resolution and that member state demonstrates bona fide to the Independent Adjudicative Office that the policy furthers a clearly stated, compelling, and practical state interest, with narrowly tailored means that are the least restrictive means necessary to achieve said interest.

  6. No member state, persons, or group of persons may deliberately coerce or require an individual to seek or receive assisted suicide, nor may any member state, persons, or group of persons deliberately coerce or require an individual against seeking or receiving assisted suicide.

  7. A medical professional expressing a bona fide objection against performing assisted suicide may not be required to perform assisted suicide, as long as that professional directs patients seeking assisted suicide to easily, readily, and locally accessible assisted suicide services. No member state, persons, or group of persons may deliberately coerce or require a medical professional to either provide or not provide such an objection.

  8. In this resolution, singular words include the plural unless otherwise indicated, and older extant World Assembly resolutions shall overrule any conflicting provisions within this resolution. Member states must interpret and obey this resolution in good faith.
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Sun Feb 20, 2022 11:08 am, edited 120 times in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:52 pm

Reserved
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Thu Feb 03, 2022 8:10 pm

OOC: Changed title from "Access To Consensual Euthanasia" to "Access To Euthanasia Services", bump.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:23 pm

This is a threat to submit in around 94 hours assuming that the at-vote repeal of #593 passes.

Image
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:28 am

Submitted =)

Campaign telegram wrote:Please approve my proposal to ensure access to assisted suicide services in WA member states!

Greetings %NATION%! I am Apatosaurus, a 4x WA author. This proposal, Access To Euthanasia Services, was written by myself and Imperium Anglorum to ensure that assisted suicide services are accessible in member states. It requires member states to directly provide free assisted suicide services, as well as travel thereto. It then prohibits discrimination against recipients of assisted suicide and individuals performing or facilitating assisted suicide, policies that hinder the accessibility of assisted suicide unless that policy passes a strict scrutiny test, as well as prohibiting coercion for individuals to either receive or not receive assisted suicide. Lastly, the proposal gives protection to medical professionals that have a consciencious objection against performing assisted suicide.

This is intended as a replacement for [resolution=GA#593]Access To Life-Ending Services[/resolution], which was recently repealed due to the presence of loopholes and other issues and flaws. This updated version addresses most of these flaws among others.

A fast and humane death is a right that individuals should be afforded if they are in unbearable agony, to put it bluntly. Denying this right will merely force people to endure unbearable agony or otherwise a low quality of life, particularly when there is no realistic prospect of improvement without such assisted suicide. Furthermore, the proposal creates safeguards to prohibit coercing individuals to receive or not receive assisted suicide, so issues regarding coercion of individuals to seek (or not seek) euthanasia are non-existent in this resolution.

A common argument against euthanasia is the "slippery slope" argument. However, this is a blatant logical fallacy. Legalising assisted suicide in the World Assembly in the circumstances in which such a right is guaranteed by this resolution will not cause member states to or to not follow such a "slippery slope"; they will likely not care whether other member states have to legalise assisted suicide in these circumstances if they are already down the slippery slope. Moreover, a resolution in the World Assembly following such a slippery slope is already possible with or without this resolution.

Another common argument against euthanasia in the case of terminally ill patients is that not all natural deaths are painful, particularly if adequate palliative care is provided. However, while this may be the case in some cases, even if it such death may not be painful, it may still result in a reduced quality of life lasting up until death. As such, this argument completely misses the point of euthansia; that individuals are not forced to suffer a poor quality of life with otherwise no realistic prospect of improvement.

Lastly, there is the argument that providing assisted suicide will encourage the reduction of palliative care or other forms of healthcare to reduce the deadliness or similar of terminal illnesses. This also could not be further from the truth. Any rational member state will develop cures or palliative care for such terminal illnesses to reduce death of their citizens. Euthanasia is not killing patients because they happen to be ill. It is allowing individuals to choose to have a quick and painless death as opposed to a slow and painful one or one until which they will have a significantly reduced quality of life with no realistic prospect of improvement otherwise. This does not reduce the necessity and important of cures and palliative care for terminal illnesses; if anything, this makes these more important.

Therefore, please approve this proposal to ensure access to assisted suicide services in WA member states.


Image
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:00 pm

This has now reached quorum following Orca and Narwhal's approval and is due to get voted on at 16 February 2022 17:00 GMT.

Image
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Bananaistan
Senator
 
Posts: 3523
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:26 pm

"The People's Republic of Bananaistan is opposed due to the charge for travel being levied on the citizens of all member states. This is bad policy considering how much cheaper it would be to simply to supply the required poison which the state can use to kill its citizens to recalcitrant member states.

"Furthermore "unable to fund" is far too nebulous, it's effectively meaningless. If a very wealthy member state is running a budget deficit, is it unable to fund these things?"
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Mon Feb 14, 2022 12:47 pm

Bananaistan wrote:"The People's Republic of Bananaistan is opposed due to the charge for travel being levied on the citizens of all member states. This is bad policy considering how much cheaper it would be to simply to supply the required poison which the state can use to kill its citizens to recalcitrant member states.

"Fair enough."

Bananaistan wrote:"Furthermore "unable to fund" is far too nebulous, it's effectively meaningless. If a very wealthy member state is running a budget deficit, is it unable to fund these things?"

"It is more than just "unable to fund"; it says "unable to fund ... without causing serious damage to their economy or finances". If a very wealthy member state does budget cuts there is no way that they cannot fund Section 2 services without causing serious damage to their economy or finances. Compare that with, say, an extremely poor member state that actually cannot fund them without causing such serious damage. Furthermore, a member state cannot unilaterally decide that they are unable to fund Section 2 services and travel without causing serious damage to.... They have to demonstrate that to the General Accounting Office, and if the GAO does not believe that they cannot fund those services and travel without causing serious damage to their economy or finances, they do not receive General Fund funding. Assuming that the GAO is reasonable, it would not spend funding from the General Fund to a rich member state making such a frivolous request."
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Simone Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Capitalizt

Postby Simone Republic » Wed Feb 16, 2022 3:23 am

This is worse that the replaced resolution on numerous levels: (1) the availability of life ending services is slightly worse (2) clause (4)(1) can be used against clause (7) for the medical professionals, (3) there is an introduction of compulsory universal health care for providing euthanasia, which many states (and countries in real life) opt out of (4) clause (8) may introduce a religious or conscience objection that will tender this moot.

Just to name a few. We really need to redraft this.
Last edited by Simone Republic on Wed Feb 16, 2022 3:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
I speak in a personal capacity OOC unless specifically IC in GP (TNP). (He/him). RP IC the "white bear" (it) is for jokes only. \ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ/

User avatar
Greater Cesnica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8989
Founded: Mar 30, 2017
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Greater Cesnica » Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:57 am

Image
The Europeian Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote FOR the General Assembly Resolution, "Access To Euthanasia Services".
Its reasoning may be found here.

Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.
George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:02 am

Simone Republic wrote:This is worse that the replaced resolution on numerous levels: (1) the availability of life ending services is slightly worse

1b.ii was in fact widened from last time.

Simone Republic wrote:(2) clause (4)(1) can be used against clause (7) for the medical professionals,

How?

Simone Republic wrote:(3) there is an introduction of compulsory universal health care for providing euthanasia, which many states (and countries in real life) opt out of

That's how it works in Access to Abortion, and if it is not an issue there it should not be an issue here.

Simone Republic wrote:(4) clause (8) may introduce a religious or conscience objection that will tender this moot.

... The conciencious objection part is there for a reason. Good.

Anyway, this is now at vote.

Image
Last edited by Apatosaurus on Wed Feb 16, 2022 3:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Glatixland
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Apr 16, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Glatixland » Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:41 pm

"Glatixland fully endorses this proposal, as we believe that state sanctioned cruelty should ONLY be used against suspected political dissidents, foreign agents, and people that we otherwise dislike for personal reasons. However, denying someone with a lethal sickness the freedom to choose their release is a level of malice that not even we deign to advocate for."

User avatar
Djuna
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jan 28, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Djuna » Wed Feb 16, 2022 2:03 pm

Following large debate and consideration, Djuna will be voting AGAINST this proposal, specifically due to provision 2:

Member states must provide fully subsidised assisted suicide services to eligible patients within their jurisdiction. Member states must also arrange and provide fully subsidised travel to receive such services for any eligible patient in areas within their jurisdiction where such services are not locally accessible. All such services and travel must be at no monetary cost to recipients.


Her Majesty the Queen agrees that, should an individual with capacity to consent, wish to die due to terminal illness, that they should be free to do so; however, She does not agree that it should be at the cost of the Crown, or at the cost of the taxpayer. Universal Healthcare is one thing - a necessity to support a healthy and fertile population regardless of means or circumstance. Subsidised euthanasia, however, is an entirely different matter altogether.

User avatar
FNR WA Office
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Feb 02, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby FNR WA Office » Wed Feb 16, 2022 2:34 pm

The Free Nations Region has voted FOR this proposal:
The previous version of this resolution, GAR#593, was repealed by GA#596 due to concerns that its wording was unclear, including that some phrases allowed the resolution to be interpreted in a manner that would allow member states to make euthanasia difficult to access. The new proposal addresses these concerns with more careful wording of its clauses. Subclause 1.b(ii) in particular has been made significantly less open to misinterpretation than its counterpart in the previous resolution, subclause 1.a(iv), which describes the type of illness a patient must have in order to receive euthanasia.

Ensuring access to euthanasia is an important topic, and one that should be addressed by World Assembly law to prevent member states from infringing on the right to receive such. Individuals should not be forced to suffer from agony or a reduced quality of life due to a serious illness when there is no realistic prospect of improvement otherwise. This proposal addresses the important topic adequately and thoroughly.
World Assembly Office of the Free Nations Region. This nation is currently operated by Apatosaurus II and My Nation.

User avatar
Empire of Blockworld
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Nov 08, 2021
Psychotic Dictatorship

[AT VOTE] Access To Euthanasia Services

Postby Empire of Blockworld » Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:18 pm

Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

User avatar
Apatosaurus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Apatosaurus » Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:20 pm

Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Ambassador Scott opens the following image on an iPad and shows it to the ambassador of Empire of Blockworld:
Image
Last edited by Luna Amore on Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: spoilered large image
This signature stands with Palestine.

End the continued practice of bombing houses, museums, refugee camps, ambulances, and churches.
WA Ambassador: Ambrose Scott; further detail on WA delegation in factbooks. Nation overview.

User avatar
Mombourg
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Nov 14, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Still opposed

Postby Mombourg » Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:15 pm

Mombourg will never support this immoral policy.

User avatar
Lamoni
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9274
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Lamoni » Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:20 pm

Apatosaurus wrote:
Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Ambassador Scott opens the following image on an iPad and shows it to the ambassador of Empire of Blockworld:
Image


*** Warning for Trolling ***
Do not post that image here again. Your post contributes nothing to the thread, and can only server to anger the poster that you are responding to.
Last edited by Luna Amore on Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: spoilered large image
National Anthem
Resides in Greater Dienstad. (Former) Mayor of Equilism.
I'm a Senior N&I RP Mentor. Questions? TG me!
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."


Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.


Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.

Part of the Meow family in Gameplay, and a GORRAM GAME MOD! My TGs are NOT for Mod Stuff.

User avatar
UniDaniLand
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Dec 12, 2021
Ex-Nation

Not supporting the resolution

Postby UniDaniLand » Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:17 am

Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Yeah he is right.Euthanasia is illegal in my country.

User avatar
Xanthorrhoea
Envoy
 
Posts: 251
Founded: Aug 22, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Xanthorrhoea » Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:27 am

Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Would the Blockworldian delegation mind elaborating on these “Moral and ReligiousTM reasons”? I’d be very interested to hear an argument.

User avatar
Berusturg
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 149
Founded: Nov 22, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Berusturg » Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:09 am

The Federation of Berusturg votes For this Proposal:

Our Ministers believe that access to Assisted Suicide should be available to anyone in our country, and think that this proposal does a much better job at addressing this topic than the now repealed resolution, GAR#593. Therefore they have chosen to vote for this proposal and will enact laws as soon as it reaches Resolution Status.

-Nipolas J. Molon, Delegate of Berusturg
Last edited by Berusturg on Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sir George moody Ⅱ, The Great King of Berusturg
The Federation of Berusturg
Overview|Other Factbooks
✉|from: Daily.Brief@Berusturg.mail.gov | 31/8/2022|25/8/1450


Weather:
Main Fed.: Bers: 27℃, Cloudy|Lasi-stan: 35℃, Stormy|Calcoria: 30℃, Sunny
Arctic Fed.: Bar-bay: -2℃, Sunny|Meintawn: -7℃, Icy|Beyr: -8℃, Sunny
AFNA: Gloriatawn: 2℃, Sunny|Piloy: 4℃, Slightly Snowy|Derbosa: 9℃, Icy
Data Provided by The Weather Pacific.org
The Berusturgenist:
Issues Every Day!
The Islandic Council prepares AFNA for more trading and a new military base|An out of control truck injures 40+ and kills one in Calcoria|The Minister of Health gets impeached due to "corruption and unconstitutional acts"

User avatar
Ulhowek
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Feb 07, 2022
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ulhowek » Thu Feb 17, 2022 8:42 am

Apatosaurus wrote:
Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Ambassador Scott opens the following image on an iPad and shows it to the ambassador of Empire of Blockworld:
Image

This is reason enough for our delegation to vote against this proposal.

User avatar
Grobilaxoeye
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Dec 10, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Grobilaxoeye » Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:03 am

Ulhowek wrote:
Apatosaurus wrote:Ambassador Scott opens the following image on an iPad and shows it to the ambassador of Empire of Blockworld:
Image

This is reason enough for our delegation to vote against this proposal.


Well someone clearly doesn't have a skeleton

BECAUSE THEY AREN"T HUMEROUS!
Last edited by Grobilaxoeye on Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:06 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Untecna
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5524
Founded: Jun 02, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Untecna » Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:12 am

Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

"Would the ambassador from Blockworld wish to explain why they have disregarded the fact that entry into the World Assembly means that some of your sovereignty disappears for the means of compliance? Further, would one explain why it is immoral to allow someone to die peacefully, and not in pain, or that it is against religion?"
UniDaniLand wrote:
Empire of Blockworld wrote:Why does this even need to be debated. If they’re gong to die they will die. Painfully. However Euthanesia is not the answer for Moral and Religous reasons. Therefore this should not be forced on countries where it is illegal. That’s just Countryist

Yeah he is right.Euthanasia is illegal in my country.

Mombourg wrote:Mombourg will never support this immoral policy.

OOC: See above.
Dragon with internet access. I am coming for your data. More for the hoard.
NFL Team: 49rs
California is the best is the worst is kinda okay
I may not be an expert on them, but I feel like I know about way too many obscure video/audio formats.
Issues Author (#1520) | Failed GA Resolution Author

User avatar
Amnesty International
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Aug 09, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Amnesty International » Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:48 am

This was asked the last time this legislation was at vote, but are criminals serving prison sentences (esp. life-senteces) eligible to receive euthanasia?

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bardhaman, Simone Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads