Merni wrote:One question:Hulldom wrote:That this resolution fails to take into account the censorship of materials given clause 1(c)’s notation that materials may not be disseminated if they are “illegal under extant national or sub national law”. States could make parts of scientific study illegal and thus prevent the dissemination of materials from the WASP regarding the scientific consensus. Thus, the failure to consider malicious states misrepresenting scientific data undermines the goals of this resolution.
How would states "make parts of scientific study illegal and thus prevent the dissemination of materials from the WASP regarding the scientific consensus" without falling foul of 436 GA Protecting Free Expression ?
Is that part of your legality challenge that the repeal would run afoul of GA 436?