by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:41 am
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:50 am
by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 11:16 am
Outer Sparta wrote:What are you trying to achieve here? Please put the title of your draft instead of just "proposal suggestions, please."
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 03, 2021 11:34 am
by Ainocra » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:21 pm
by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:24 pm
Ainocra wrote:The one eyed man speaks, "Well I've been told that TV rots your brain, is this an attempt to keep the local zombie population well fed? "
"I suggest putting under the environmental tags then." With that he sips his scotch and leans back into his chair again.
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Hanovereich » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:27 pm
by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:42 pm
Hanovereich wrote:OOC
To clarify, you're saying 'Suggests every WA member nation'? And with all those 'and' words in section 1, there are going to be a lot of criteria for something to be labelled as dangerous. Does every service have to meet every single one of those criteria to be labelled as banned? Then what about 3b- 'Dangerous, and does not provide the advertised results'? Can I, for example, upload a video with the title 'FLYING THROUGH THE AIR WITH NO PARACHUTE!!!!', and I actually do fly through the air with no parachute, but I cannot label it as dangerous because it actually does provide the advertised results...?
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Hanovereich » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:45 pm
Cheries wrote:Hanovereich wrote:OOC
To clarify, you're saying 'Suggests every WA member nation'? And with all those 'and' words in section 1, there are going to be a lot of criteria for something to be labelled as dangerous. Does every service have to meet every single one of those criteria to be labelled as banned? Then what about 3b- 'Dangerous, and does not provide the advertised results'? Can I, for example, upload a video with the title 'FLYING THROUGH THE AIR WITH NO PARACHUTE!!!!', and I actually do fly through the air with no parachute, but I cannot label it as dangerous because it actually does provide the advertised results...?
First - the services aren't banned: dangerous content posted on one of those services are restricted.
Second - for your example, that wouldn't even be relevant - you that's what you have to say in your required declaration of dangerous content; those aren't the exact requirements for what constitutes dangerous content.
by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:55 pm
Hanovereich wrote:Cheries wrote:
First - the services aren't banned: dangerous content posted on one of those services are restricted.
Second - for your example, that wouldn't even be relevant - you that's what you have to say in your required declaration of dangerous content; those aren't the exact requirements for what constitutes dangerous content.
Whoops. I meant video instead of service. Does every video have to meet every single one of those criteria to be labelled as dangerous?
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Ainocra » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:57 pm
by Bananaistan » Wed Nov 03, 2021 1:06 pm
by Cheries » Wed Nov 03, 2021 1:36 pm
Ainocra wrote:The one eyed man rouses from his doze. "It seems to me that this could very easily be perverted by the assembly to that has a few staff vacancies. clause 7."
Leaning back again he mutters. "If you want to ban them then just ban them don't dace around it." With that he lapses once again into quiescence.
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Hanovereich » Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:03 am
by Cheries » Thu Nov 04, 2021 7:10 am
Hanovereich wrote:Cheries wrote:
Yes, but many of those come as a package. Take 1a and 1d, for example. It's hard to take one without the other.
OOC
So section 1 still requires a video to meet every single one of those criteria, unless you can add a few 'and/or's. Also, your definition of dangerous content doesn't make sense- you're saying, 'Defines “Dangerous Content” as made with no concern...'. That doesn't define what is made with no concern to the safety of the viewer. Anything that is made with no concern for the safety of viewers (which- since you haven't mentioned dangerous content as, for this resolution, videos- doesn't make sense) can now be labelled as Dangerous Content?
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Xanthorrhoea » Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:15 am
Cheries wrote:RECOGNIZING that freedom of expression is a precious and unalienable right;
FURTHER RECOGNIZING that video services must protect this right;
REALIZING that dangerous content may be produced on such video services;
FURTHER REALIZING that viewers may not have the prerequisite expertise to recognize dangerous content;
Cheries wrote:Hereby enacts that every WA Member Nation henceforth:
Cheries wrote:1 - Defines “Dangerous Content” as video content:
-a. Made with no concern for what dangers may be caused by viewers replicating actions in the content;
-b. Made solely for profit, with no intended and obvious educational or entertaining message;
-c. Encourages viewers to follow a behavior that causes risk of property damage, injury, or legal action and/or prosecution against the viewer;
-d. Actively and knowingly misleads viewers; and may also
--i. Provide little or no explanation of reasoning behind actions in the content; and/or
--ii. Encourage viewers to perform a set of actions that bear no connection to the goal of those acting the content, or viewers replicating said content.
Cheries wrote:2 - Defines “Video Service” as:
-a. An internet-based, free or paid service;
-b. Allows viewers to stream live video content, or submit video content to a website; and
-c. Allows viewers to watch live content or submitted content on the aforementioned website.
Cheries wrote:3 - Requires that those who live stream or submit dangerous content to online video services clearly state that this content is:
-a. Not to be reproduced;
-b. Dangerous content, or does not provide the advertised results; and
-c. Is purely for the viewer’s entertainment, with no educational or convenience value.
Cheries wrote:4 - Requires that video services supply adequate moderation to protect viewers from dangerous content, by:
-a. Allowing concerned viewers to easily and without restriction notify moderators of possibly dangerous content;
-b. Employing moderators to overview possibly dangerous content, and monitor those who frequently produce dangerous content;
-c. Clearly stating that dangerous content must not be produced on their video service; and
-d. Punishing those that frequently produce dangerous content, and/or do not correctly comply by clause 3's guidelines. This can be done by:
--i. age-restricting content;
--ii. banning the creators of the dangerous content; or
--iii. notifying viewers watching the creator’s content of its dangerous nature.
-e. Employing at least 1 individual for every 50 moderators with official college or post-college academic education in food science, law, or home appliances (electricity, plumbing, etc.), as to advise moderators in revealing dangerous content.
Cheries wrote:5 - Requires that viewers be able to pursue legal action against those who produce, distribute, or moderate dangerous content if:
-a. Moderators were not properly advised on dangerous content;
-b. Viewers could not easily contact moderators;
-c. Viewers were injured, traumatized, or otherwise actively harmed by behaviors encouraged or popularized by dangerous content; or
-d. A video service did not follow the previous guidelines stated in clause 4.
Cheries wrote:6 - Informs their population of the hazards of dangerous content by:
-a. Information on government sites;
-b. Minor curriculum changes in secondary education;
-c. Public information campaigns (eg. Video advertising campaigns, posters in public areas, government statements); or
-d. Informing citizens about dangerous content when they buy devices capable of connecting to the Internet.
Cheries wrote:7 - Requires that video services violating clause 4 be:
-a. Prevented from being viewed in their nation;
-b. Fined for damage caused to viewers; or
-c. Forced to pay for expenses suffered by viewers due to dangerous content.
Cheries wrote:REAFFIRMING that:
I - Dangerous content must be labeled properly as dangerous content. (3)
II - Video services must restrict the production of dangerous content, and moderate already distributed dangerous content. (4)
III - Viewers have the legal right to pursue legal action against the distributors, moderators, and creators of dangerous content. (5)
IV - Viewers should and must be informed about the hazards of dangerous content. (6)
V - Video services not properly restricting the spread of dangerous content can and will face government fines or other punishment.(7)
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:58 am
by Polomon Islands » Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:02 am
by Cheries » Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:13 am
Polomon Islands wrote:What does this do in a nutshell?
Ban inappropriate videos or sites?
I'm seeing a lot of complaining here.
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by THE Grob » Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:23 am
by Cheries » Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:30 am
The Grob wrote:Putting an egg in the microwave does not lead to burns in your face. Unless you have an outdated microwave which somehow runs with the door open, the only thing that happens is the egg explodes, and it splatters the yolk over the microwave. Completely harmless- all you need to do is just clean up the mess afterwards. Neither would putting an egg in water do anything. To censor these types of videos is to deny they ever happened. The population becomes stupid and ignorant as a result of these issues not being addressed or shown in action. It is up to the individual watching the video not to be a fool to copy the actions in the video, not up to a bunch of bureaucrats up at the top trying to sugarcoat dangerous activities for their "safety".
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Polomon Islands » Thu Nov 04, 2021 11:54 am
Cheries wrote:The Grob wrote:Putting an egg in the microwave does not lead to burns in your face. Unless you have an outdated microwave which somehow runs with the door open, the only thing that happens is the egg explodes, and it splatters the yolk over the microwave. Completely harmless- all you need to do is just clean up the mess afterwards. Neither would putting an egg in water do anything. To censor these types of videos is to deny they ever happened. The population becomes stupid and ignorant as a result of these issues not being addressed or shown in action. It is up to the individual watching the video not to be a fool to copy the actions in the video, not up to a bunch of bureaucrats up at the top trying to sugarcoat dangerous activities for their "safety".
Firstly, about the egg: that was an example, though I should point out that eggs still explode in up-to-date machinery: the way any microwave heats food can explode a raw, boiled, shelled, unshelled, yolkless, or whiteless egg, even explode after they've come out of the microwave, or if the microwave has stopped heating them.
Secondly: did you see clause 6, which requires education on dangerous content?
Even still, when these things are taking over popular sites everywhere, the average person doesn't know much, or anything, about the dangrs presented by many "craft" "hack" or "prank" content
by Cheries » Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:03 pm
Polomon Islands wrote:Cheries wrote:
Firstly, about the egg: that was an example, though I should point out that eggs still explode in up-to-date machinery: the way any microwave heats food can explode a raw, boiled, shelled, unshelled, yolkless, or whiteless egg, even explode after they've come out of the microwave, or if the microwave has stopped heating them.
Secondly: did you see clause 6, which requires education on dangerous content?
Even still, when these things are taking over popular sites everywhere, the average person doesn't know much, or anything, about the dangrs presented by many "craft" "hack" or "prank" content
so they prevent bad videos on the internet?
Should they just have a "DONT DO THIS AT HOME!" Warning instead of preventing those videos from being posting.
Foreṡ Post: Third Goat Explosion in 18 Months at the DMV After Ale Binge || "Unnerving" Granite Chunk Appears in Park in Xau̇mtē || Public Toilet Explodes after Armenian Tourist Flushes 15kg of Sand, Half-Eaten Birthday Cake, 19 Socks, Russian Flag, Box of Hamsters, and AK-47 || Opinion: It's Time to Ban Pastel Blue
by Xanthorrhoea » Fri Nov 05, 2021 6:43 am
by THE Grob » Fri Nov 05, 2021 7:09 am
Cheries wrote:The Grob wrote:Putting an egg in the microwave does not lead to burns in your face. Unless you have an outdated microwave which somehow runs with the door open, the only thing that happens is the egg explodes, and it splatters the yolk over the microwave. Completely harmless- all you need to do is just clean up the mess afterwards. Neither would putting an egg in water do anything. To censor these types of videos is to deny they ever happened. The population becomes stupid and ignorant as a result of these issues not being addressed or shown in action. It is up to the individual watching the video not to be a fool to copy the actions in the video, not up to a bunch of bureaucrats up at the top trying to sugarcoat dangerous activities for their "safety".
Firstly, about the egg: that was an example, though I should point out that eggs still explode in up-to-date machinery: the way any microwave heats food can explode a raw, boiled, shelled, unshelled, yolkless, or whiteless egg, even explode after they've come out of the microwave, or if the microwave has stopped heating them.
Secondly: did you see clause 6, which requires education on dangerous content?
Even still, when these things are taking over popular sites everywhere, the average person doesn't know much, or anything, about the dangrs presented by many "craft" "hack" or "prank" content
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: AnnaK
Advertisement