NATION

PASSWORD

[On hold] Genocide Prevention Act (GPA)

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Malairium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 16, 2020
Democratic Socialists

[On hold] Genocide Prevention Act (GPA)

Postby Malairium » Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:46 pm

Genocide Prevention Act (GPA)
A resolution to strengthen international responses to Genocide
Category: International Aid
Strength: Weak
Proposed by: Malairium

Description:
Article I, Preamble:

The World Assembly recognizes the right of each member state to autonomous self-governance. It further recognizes the sovereign state as the foremost provider of security, as well as the central mechanism for human development. However, the World Assembly also believes that the sovereign state is not an infallible tool in the pursuit of human development. The World Assembly recognizes that in cases of state-sponsored genocide, there is currently sparse support for victims. The World Assembly hereby enacts this resolution to promote international cooperation against genocide.


Article II, Definitions:
1) Genocide shall, for the purposes of this resolution, be defined as the killing of people based solely on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, or gender.


Article III, Requirements of Nations:
1) The WA Commission on Human Rights (WACHR) will be given the authority to:
1a) use World Assembly funds to secure the safety of potential or current victims
1b) coordinate international responses to instances of genocide
1c) investigate instances of genocide, and develop recommendations to avoid further cases

2) The WACHR does not have the authority to compel any state to make action

3) At no point, unless explicitly stated otherwise, does the GPA give a state the right to:
I. Breach international law, particularly in regards to the treatment of non-combatants
II. Exploit the GPA to benefit their own state at the cost of the threatened population


**Sponsored by: currently unsponsored
Last edited by Malairium on Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:35 pm, edited 4 times in total.
We’ll never give you up, and we’ll never let you down

User avatar
Berhakonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 454
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Berhakonia » Sun Jul 25, 2021 10:22 pm

1. I don't think we have a WAHCR (I could be wrong)

2. Wait, so any racially-motivated murder counts as genocide? What about wartime casualties (which are almost entirely motivated by nationality)? A soldier killing another soldier from a different nation now constitutes as genocide?
A Confederation of Clans in Fealty to the Imperial Throne of Gobul
"There are foolish leaders who believe their subjects as lessers to be subjugated, and there are wise leaders who understand that they are their subjects are one in the same."
-Asrau Arslan XIV Jangpavalgan
Brotherhood, Tradition, Charity

User avatar
Malairium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 16, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malairium » Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:25 pm

Berhakonia wrote:1. I don't think we have a WAHCR (I could be wrong)

2. Wait, so any racially-motivated murder counts as genocide? What about wartime casualties (which are almost entirely motivated by nationality)? A soldier killing another soldier from a different nation now constitutes as genocide?



Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback.

On your first point, I will check that, I think you're right, so I'll add that bit in.

As to your second point, I agree it could be clearer, but in the case you mention, the wartime casualty would occur as a result of the person being a member of the opposed armed forces that are engaged in war, and therefore nationality is not the sole reason for their death (this definition is kinda open to abuse, so I'll think about it and am happy to take suggestions). However, if a member of a foreign military group say, launched an artillery strike against a city purely to cause civilian casualties, then that could be classified as genocide/attempted genocide, as there is no other legitimate reason for their targeting.

Thanks for your help, and I look forward to continuing dialogue on this issue.
Last edited by Malairium on Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We’ll never give you up, and we’ll never let you down

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12313
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:27 pm

GA#38 "Convention Against Genocide" exists.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; possibly very controversial; *author of the most popular SC resolution ever
Who am I, really? 47yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading Divided by Tim Marshall

User avatar
Malairium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 16, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malairium » Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:32 pm

Tinhampton wrote:GA#38 "Convention Against Genocide" exists.



You would be right about that.

Very sorry.
We’ll never give you up, and we’ll never let you down


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads