by Second Indus Order » Wed Jul 21, 2021 11:49 pm
by Second Indus Order » Wed Jul 21, 2021 11:57 pm
Sincluda wrote:OOC: This is illegal for being a NatSov only at the moment. How can you find an argument against this legislation in particular, and less about sovereignty?
by Wallenburg » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:12 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Sincluda wrote:OOC: This is illegal for being a NatSov only at the moment. How can you find an argument against this legislation in particular, and less about sovereignty?
We think that enforcing the particular definition of gender as also by cultural roles each culture usually ascribes them, goes against ours and quite possibly many other nation state's values, which they may choose to abstain from. Keeping that in mind, nations who do support this theory may choose to voluntarily do so.
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:23 am
Wallenburg wrote:Second Indus Order wrote:We think that enforcing the particular definition of gender as also by cultural roles each culture usually ascribes them, goes against ours and quite possibly many other nation state's values, which they may choose to abstain from. Keeping that in mind, nations who do support this theory may choose to voluntarily do so.
Repeating your natsov only argument doesn't make it less illegal. You'll have to make arguments against the actual resolution, rather than merely assert that member states should be free to do whatever they want.
by Sincluda » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:27 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Repeating your natsov only argument doesn't make it less illegal. You'll have to make arguments against the actual resolution, rather than merely assert that member states should be free to do whatever they want.
Hi
How about the fact that human gender has been genetic for all human history, with the exception of modern times. We must return to tradition and oppose these modern notions which redefine what is written in scripture. Trad states like us therefore object to this convention.
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:31 am
Sincluda wrote:Second Indus Order wrote:Hi
How about the fact that human gender has been genetic for all human history, with the exception of modern times. We must return to tradition and oppose these modern notions which redefine what is written in scripture. Trad states like us therefore object to this convention.
ok make that your repeal then
by Wallenburg » Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:36 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Repeating your natsov only argument doesn't make it less illegal. You'll have to make arguments against the actual resolution, rather than merely assert that member states should be free to do whatever they want.
Hi
How about the fact that human gender has been genetic for all human history, with the exception of modern times. We must return to tradition and oppose these modern notions which redefine what is written in scripture. Trad states like us therefore object to this convention.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:54 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Sincluda wrote:OOC: This is illegal for being a NatSov only at the moment. How can you find an argument against this legislation in particular, and less about sovereignty?
We think that enforcing the particular definition of gender as also by cultural roles each culture usually ascribes them, goes against ours and quite possibly many other nation state's values, which they may choose to abstain from. Keeping that in mind, nations who do support this theory may choose to voluntarily do so.
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Jul 22, 2021 3:33 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Repeating your natsov only argument doesn't make it less illegal. You'll have to make arguments against the actual resolution, rather than merely assert that member states should be free to do whatever they want.
Hi
How about the fact that human gender has been genetic for all human history, with the exception of modern times. We must return to tradition and oppose these modern notions which redefine what is written in scripture. Trad states like us therefore object to this convention.
by Outer Sparta » Thu Jul 22, 2021 4:21 am
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:35 am
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Second Indus Order wrote:We think that enforcing the particular definition of gender as also by cultural roles each culture usually ascribes them, goes against ours and quite possibly many other nation state's values, which they may choose to abstain from. Keeping that in mind, nations who do support this theory may choose to voluntarily do so.
OOC: You argue Westphalian sovereignty in a chamber as non-Westphalian as possible, in the name of oppressing the Others you personally deem to be objectionable. Do you see where this is going?
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:54 am
by Outer Sparta » Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:34 am
by Frisbeeteria » Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:42 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Repealing Convention on Gender
Second Indus Order wrote:>anime profile picture
by Berhakonia » Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:46 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Jul 22, 2021 9:39 am
Second Indus Order wrote:The General Assembly,
NOTING the resolution's intention to improve worldwide human and civil rights;
CONCERNED on the lackluster redefining of gender from natural to the merely "prevalent";
SUPPORTING for nations to act on the topic of Gender on a non-revisionist way;
Hereby Repeals Resolution on the Convention on Gender(World Assembly Resolution #91).
by Tsaivao » Thu Jul 22, 2021 9:53 am
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 10:37 am
by Second Indus Order » Thu Jul 22, 2021 10:39 am
Jedinsto wrote:"The WA has no place to tell people they can't feel female, male, or anywhere in between."
by Tsaivao » Thu Jul 22, 2021 11:02 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Jedinsto wrote:"The WA has no place to tell people they can't feel female, male, or anywhere in between."
that's the thing. the WA has no right to redefine gender to some kind of spectrum as opposed to the original unit of male and female. we simply want to repeal that.
plus how does a plea to repeal a convention go into voting? i am new to this
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
by Drew Durrnil » Thu Jul 22, 2021 11:04 am
Rosartemis wrote:DOWN WITH UEPU THOSE DAMNED RAIDERS!
by Danaqa » Thu Jul 22, 2021 11:06 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Jedinsto wrote:"The WA has no place to tell people they can't feel female, male, or anywhere in between."
that's the thing. the WA has no right to redefine gender to some kind of spectrum as opposed to the original unit of male and female. we simply want to repeal that.
plus how does a plea to repeal a convention go into voting? i am new to this
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bisofeyr
Advertisement