NationStates

Texkentuck wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:I have no plans or interest in repealing anything written about abortion. For the purposes of the WA I can deal with abortion being always guaranteed, even if I find it immoral in most cases. And, the vastly pro-choice voter base would never allow a pro-life based repeal anyways.

All the proposals by nations such as yours are nothing more than slabs. Best vote ever is to not join the WA...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

Jedinsto wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
All the proposals by nations such as yours are nothing more than slabs. Best vote ever is to not join the WA...


Also WA Nations ask too many questions. No it's not an insult it's a fact...The insult was directed at my nation but I don't care because it's a good nation with out foreign laws...Also it's a wild nation in which the kids like to see rockets flying through the sky... go figure....

President Bram W. Schirkophf

"Is 'slab' supposed to be an insult?"

Texkentuck wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:"Is 'slab' supposed to be an insult?"

Shazbotdom wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:

OOC:
Normally when you reply to another character, you put your reply outside of the Quote tags.


IC:
"This legislation not only is a shamble, but it reeks of NeoCon ideals that the State should mandate some sort of religious style of morals. Not all nations here follow your specific religious ideology, and therefore using that as a basis for your proposal off of that is foolhardy and a waste of this August Body's time. The Empire makes a motion to burn the proposal text. Do I have a second?"

Antuan D. Flabberghast
Shazite Ambassador to the World Assembly

The Crusader State of Lyon wrote:What I find amazing in this topic is that nobody really discuss about what is written but more about how it is written. He clearly said that he was not a professional writter of WA proposals and that he was asking for help to make it better. As I am not a proffessional myself, I can't really do much about it.

Yet I do agree with the point that you should not use religion in your proposal because there is people who do not care about religion.

Besides that I think it is a great proposal even if it won't be endorsed by most people.

Texkentuck wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:"Is 'slab' supposed to be an insult?"

Jedinsto wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:

OOC: You.... quoted me without responding? I'm confused

Jedinsto wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:

OOC: You.... quoted me without responding? I'm confused

Jedinsto wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
All the proposals by nations such as yours are nothing more than slabs. Best vote ever is to not join the WA...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

"Is 'slab' supposed to be an insult?"

Daarwyrth wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
This WA has put a lot in place and has proposals built on proposals. Surprised that's allowed... I'm not going to bother with this in the WA. It's crooked...

OOC: You say the WA is crooked, yet you fail to consider that perhaps you are the odd one out, not the other way around. Your perspectives on the world and life aren't universal, and in this case, they're opposed by a majority. I assume that if a majority of the WA supported your proposal the organization would suddenly not be crooked? In other words, it's only crooked if it disagrees with you, and that reveals quite a bit about your intentions here, I'd say.

Texkentuck wrote:

Daarwyrth wrote:OOC: You say the WA is crooked, yet you fail to consider that perhaps you are the odd one out, not the other way around. Your perspectives on the world and life aren't universal, and in this case, they're opposed by a majority. I assume that if a majority of the WA supported your proposal the organization would suddenly not be crooked? In other words, it's only crooked if it disagrees with you, and that reveals quite a bit about your intentions here, I'd say.

ooc: Nor is your perspective universal.... You'd be surprised.....No ones accused you of being odd?! Also the WA is a game....It's not the real world.....There are people who would disagree with you saying technically no ones odd... I think odd people exist. Most of my nation is over the top but that's because it's a game but I am actually pro-life....Not because I want to suppress women but because it's actually a baby growing. I hope you have a good day.... Also crooked isn't the right word to use. It's just very biased towards any pro-life nation. Seriously would have to take away 3 proposals to get in a pro-life proposal. What a Joke..... It's all good. The WA can do what it wants.......

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:"This nonsense is still going on?"

Outer Sparta wrote:

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:"This nonsense is still going on?"

Ambassador Tav: Yes. At this point, the drafting delegation is just calling the World Assembly corrupt just because they don't have much support for their subpar proposal.

Texkentuck wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Ambassador Tav: Yes. At this point, the drafting delegation is just calling the World Assembly corrupt just because they don't have much support for their subpar proposal.

We see the WA as very biased. An unthinkable majority body with nothing more to say than state the obvious and stand on one belief that it's only the women that injustice is done against. The WA is full of narrow minded like minded overeducated stating undereducated brain washed indoctrination of liberalism. It's so evident the WA may not be able to recognize abortion is intrinsically bad. Some nations may have to go look up the word intrinsic...It's a basic word. This WA lack of understanding detours me to ever join.....May your nations dictate each other and never reach a renaissance of free thought....Your citizens are appressed by the same way this proposal is suppressed...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

Sincluda wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:

We see the WA as very biased. An unthinkable majority body with nothing more to say than state the obvious and stand on one belief that it's only the women that injustice is done against. The WA is full of narrow minded like minded overeducated stating undereducated brain washed indoctrination of liberalism. It's so evident the WA may not be able to recognize abortion is intrinsically bad. Some nations may have to go look up the word intrinsic...It's a basic word. This WA lack of understanding detours me to ever join.....May your nations dictate each other and never reach a renaissance of free thought....Your citizens are appressed by the same way this proposal is suppressed...

President Bram W. Schirkophf

OOC: “biased?” No. This is a majority of nations sharing an opinion and approving legislation on that opinion. That is not bias, that is basic congressional functioning

Texkentuck wrote:

Sincluda wrote:OOC: “biased?” No. This is a majority of nations sharing an opinion and approving legislation on that opinion. That is not bias, that is basic congressional functioning

ooc: Prove it.....Find one proposal that is conservative? Not moderately one that is a liberal idea that's bipartisan. This was is biased towards conservative ideals...

Texkentuck wrote:

Sincluda wrote:OOC: “biased?” No. This is a majority of nations sharing an opinion and approving legislation on that opinion. That is not bias, that is basic congressional functioning

ooc: Prove it.....Find one proposal that is conservative? Not moderately one that is a liberal idea that's bipartisan. .

Sincluda wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
ooc: Prove it.....Find one proposal that is conservative? Not moderately one that is a liberal idea that's bipartisan. This was is biased towards conservative ideals...

OOC: Conservative proposals don't have anything to do with bias. Most people here have stances on issues that are generally liberal. That doesn't make it biased, that makes the WA have a dominant ideology, like all legislative bodies have.

Edit: Your whole argument is that the WA legislates things...

Sincluda wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
ooc: Prove it.....Find one proposal that is conservative? Not moderately one that is a liberal idea that's bipartisan. This was is biased towards conservative ideals...

OOC: Conservative proposals don't have anything to do with bias. Most people here have stances on issues that are generally liberal. That doesn't make it biased, that makes the WA have a dominant ideology, like all legislative bodies have.

Edit: Your whole argument is that the WA legislates things...

Texkentuck wrote:

Sincluda wrote:OOC: Conservative proposals don't have anything to do with bias. Most people here have stances on issues that are generally liberal. That doesn't make it biased, that makes the WA have a dominant ideology, like all legislative bodies have.

Edit: Your whole argument is that the WA legislates things...

ooc: Most legislative bodies don't operate like the WA. They can have a government shut down or philibuster or cut deals for democracy sake...The WA is a game and just decides to unweavering to anything...Why would a conservative nation subject themselves if it's all fence sitters and far left ideology... good day....My nation made good points and understand the majority has a distaste for religion but i have a distaste for far left liberalism....Good Day which is like a religion in and of itself....

Texkentuck wrote:

Sincluda wrote:OOC: Conservative proposals don't have anything to do with bias. Most people here have stances on issues that are generally liberal. That doesn't make it biased, that makes the WA have a dominant ideology, like all legislative bodies have.

Edit: Your whole argument is that the WA legislates things...

ooc: Most legislative bodies don't operate like the WA. They can have a government shut down or philibuster or cut deals for democracy sake...The WA is a game and just decides to unweavering to anything...Why would a conservative nation subject themselves if it's all fence sitters and far left ideology... good day....My nation made good points and understand the majority has a distaste for religion but i have a distaste for far left liberalism....Good Day which is like a religion in and of itself....

Morover wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
ooc: Most legislative bodies don't operate like the WA. They can have a government shut down or philibuster or cut deals for democracy sake...The WA is a game and just decides to unweavering to anything...Why would a conservative nation subject themselves if it's all fence sitters and far left ideology... good day....My nation made good points and understand the majority has a distaste for religion but i have a distaste for far left liberalism....Good Day which is like a religion in and of itself....

Right to an abortion isn't a far-left policy.

Texkentuck wrote:

Morover wrote:Right to an abortion isn't a far-left policy.

You ignored the argument again by throwing in something off topic. Stay with me Sarah Palin....

Most legislative bodies don't operate like the WA. They can have a government shut down or philibuster or cut deals for democracy sake...The WA is a game and just decides to unweavering to anything...Why would a conservative nation subject themselves if it's all fence sitters and far left ideology?

Sincluda wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:
ooc: Most legislative bodies don't operate like the WA. They can have a government shut down or philibuster or cut deals for democracy sake...The WA is a game and just decides to unweavering to anything...Why would a conservative nation subject themselves if it's all fence sitters and far left ideology... good day....My nation made good points and understand the majority has a distaste for religion but i have a distaste for far left liberalism....Good Day which is like a religion in and of itself....

OOC: "Far-left" ha

Fantastic observation that the WA isn't super incredibly complicated and is a game, but it still functions with the exact same principles of legislative bodies.