
by Nopengie » Wed Jul 14, 2021 2:57 pm

by Morover » Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:03 pm

by Nopengie » Thu Jul 15, 2021 12:55 am
Morover wrote:Darin Perise, President of the Morovian Department on the World Assembly.
"I cannot see any logistical reason that this is needed while Resolution 499 is on the books, nor can I find any effect it would have that is not already covered by that resolution."

by West-Indies » Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:06 am
Nopengie wrote:The WA,
Recognising the debate on abortion and the subjects that it branches off of,
Noticing the debate on whether medical professionals should have to perform abortions or not,
Hereby puts into place the following regulations.
1. All WA member states are required to set up a medical department for the purpose of abortion.
2. This "Abortion department", as it will be be referred to as, must perform abortions when requested unless there is a valid medical reason why they cannot, limited to 3 scenarios,those scenarios being 1. The patient is not pregnant. 2. The patient will pass away if the abortion is performed 3. The patient will receieve great physical harm due to the abortion being performed (life threatening harm).
3. Any guideline breaches by a member of the Abortion department should be met with termination from the Abortion department.
4. A WA organisation shall be formed named the World Assembly Abortion Organisation (WAAO).
5. The WAAO shall fund all nations adequately enough to roll this program out and maintain it.

by Lexicor » Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:15 am

by Araraukar » Thu Jul 15, 2021 3:45 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by Nopengie » Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:42 pm
Morover wrote:Darin Perise, President of the Morovian Department on the World Assembly.
"I cannot see any logistical reason that this is needed while Resolution 499 is on the books, nor can I find any effect it would have that is not already covered by that resolution."

by Nopengie » Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:28 pm

by Tinhampton » Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:32 pm

by WayNeacTia » Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:59 pm
Nopengie wrote:All responses that are simply just pro life propaganda and do not contribute to the discussion will be ignored.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait

by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 17, 2021 1:37 am


by Outer Sparta » Sat Jul 17, 2021 7:26 am
Nopengie wrote:All responses that are simply just pro life propaganda and do not contribute to the discussion will be ignored.

by Separatist Peoples » Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:39 pm
Nopengie wrote:All responses that are simply just pro life propaganda and do not contribute to the discussion will be ignored.

by Sylh Alanor » Sat Jul 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Nopengie wrote:3. Any guideline breaches by a member of the Abortion department should be met with termination from the Abortion department.

by Union of All Socialist Peoples » Mon Jul 19, 2021 6:28 am

by Second Indus Order » Wed Jul 21, 2021 5:17 am
Outer Sparta wrote:Nopengie wrote:All responses that are simply just pro life propaganda and do not contribute to the discussion will be ignored.
How are all the responses "pro-life propaganda?" They're simply ones telling you to look at other drafts (499 is one that covers all the basis while yours hardly does much at all) or telling you how to properly work on a draft.

by Outer Sparta » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:44 am
Second Indus Order wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:How are all the responses "pro-life propaganda?" They're simply ones telling you to look at other drafts (499 is one that covers all the basis while yours hardly does much at all) or telling you how to properly work on a draft.
hey, im new here, how do i find the resolutions?

by Nopengie » Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:33 am
Outer Sparta wrote:Nopengie wrote:All responses that are simply just pro life propaganda and do not contribute to the discussion will be ignored.
How are all the responses "pro-life propaganda?" They're simply ones telling you to look at other drafts (499 is one that covers all the basis while yours hardly does much at all) or telling you how to properly work on a draft.

by Nopengie » Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:39 am
Tinhampton wrote:Why do you believe that member states cannot effectively ensure the legalisation of abortion without an Abortion Department? Would you support requiring member states to set up a Vaccination Department to facilitate vaccinations against communicable diseases, a Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department to promote the treatment of cancer, or a Slings and Casts Department to heal broken bones more rapidly?

by Tsaivao » Wed Aug 11, 2021 3:43 am
Nopengie wrote:Tinhampton wrote:Why do you believe that member states cannot effectively ensure the legalisation of abortion without an Abortion Department? Would you support requiring member states to set up a Vaccination Department to facilitate vaccinations against communicable diseases, a Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department to promote the treatment of cancer, or a Slings and Casts Department to heal broken bones more rapidly?
It makes it easier to cover abortion in the resolution and ensures the rest makes sense. Also a Cancer department and a Vaccination Department sound great so thanks for those ideas.
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8

by Sierra Lyricalia » Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:33 am
Tsaivao wrote:Nopengie wrote:It makes it easier to cover abortion in the resolution and ensures the rest makes sense. Also a Cancer department and a Vaccination Department sound great so thanks for those ideas.
"You've failed to adequately answer the question," says Delegate Manhu, angling his beak downward. "These provisions don't need to be handled by an entire department of government with the singular purpose of accomplishing abortions. The 'easier' thing to do, Ambassador, would be to put a set of guidelines without the unnecessary red tape. You fail to argue for its existence except to insinuate that its existence is necessary. Is this not the most classical example of a bureaucracy expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy?"
Manhu leaned back. "Although we support most pro-choice legislature, we are opposed to this one. The author has not sufficiently argued their case, nor differentiated from other legislation already in-effect."

by Outer Sparta » Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:28 am
Nopengie wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:How are all the responses "pro-life propaganda?" They're simply ones telling you to look at other drafts (499 is one that covers all the basis while yours hardly does much at all) or telling you how to properly work on a draft.
I'm saying that any responses that are just saying" I'm pro life screw this!" are gonna be ignored. Not that there are many, but I'm making it clear.

by Odinburgh » Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:35 am

by Piscina » Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:58 am

by Separatist Peoples » Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:17 am
Odinburgh wrote:I'm pro choice myself but I would not support this. First its a sticky issue as you have the pro-life and pro-choice crowds which are ever feuding. Second I think the WA should be left out of this. Thirdly most important just let individual regions and nations sort themselves out on this policy which I think is the best route. NS is a big place with a lot of regions with different viewpoints.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement