NATION

PASSWORD

[Abandoned] Chocolate Purity Standards

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: Jun 21, 2021
Ex-Nation

[Abandoned] Chocolate Purity Standards

Postby In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:04 am

Category: Regulation
AoE: Consumer Protection
The World Assembly,

RECOGNIZING the mass consumption of chocolate across the globe, resulting in international trade of goods at an enormous scale,

OBSERVING that the quality of international consumables is not only a health concern, but an individual economic concern for every person that buys chocolate,

EMPHASIZING that the goal of this resolution is not to prevent individuals from purchasing internationally traded chocolate, but to establish a set of regulations on the industries that produce them,

Hereby:
      1. Defines "chocolate" as a preparation derived from the seeds of the cacao plant that is made in the form of a liquid, paste, powder, or block.
      2. Mandates that for a product to be advertised, labeled, and sold as 'chocolate' it must be within the following standards:
        a. Dark, Unsweetened, or Pure Chocolate: the product must have a minimum cocoa content of 60%.
        b. Milk Chocolate: the product must have a minimum cocoa content of 35%.
        c. White Chocolate: the product must contain a minimum of 20% cocoa butter.
        d. If the product does not follow these standards, it may not be sold as chocolate, but may be advertised as chocolate flavored.
    FURTHERMORE,

    URGES that all member states ensure that internationally traded chocolates that have been imported are not the product of exploited child labor.

    ENCOURAGES member states to take steps to domestically verify the origin and labor practices employed by the industrial entity of sale, further ensuring that there is no profit from exploitation of child labor.

    RECOMMENDS that in cases where a member state finds that these mandates are not followed, or discovers that the product was produced as a result of exploited labor, that they take steps to ensure international sanctions are imposed.
    Last edited by In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia on Sun Jul 18, 2021 11:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

    User avatar
    Hanovereich
    Diplomat
     
    Posts: 899
    Founded: Jun 24, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby Hanovereich » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:07 am

    “This seems like a lot of the previous employment laws but directed solely at chocolate. And apparently anything that does not have enough cocoa- including food with no cocoa- can become chocolate flavoured?
    Last edited by Hanovereich on Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
    A Brit who just likes P2TM, political/geopolitical RPs.

    User avatar
    Tinhampton
    Postmaster-General
     
    Posts: 12313
    Founded: Oct 05, 2016
    Civil Rights Lovefest

    Postby Tinhampton » Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:41 am

    Opposed. The first half is almost as bad as Mahaj's proposal about toothpaste - right down to the hovering question marks around category - and the second half belongs in a resolution generally covering child and forced labour rather than one about how chocolate ought to be advertised (hint: GA#4 and GA#23 exist).
    Last edited by Tinhampton on Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
    The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

    Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664
    The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; possibly very controversial; *author of the most popular SC resolution ever
    Who am I, really? 47yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading Divided by Tim Marshall

    User avatar
    Potted Plants United
    Ambassador
     
    Posts: 1280
    Founded: Jan 14, 2013
    Democratic Socialists

    Postby Potted Plants United » Tue Jul 13, 2021 7:44 am

    OOC: Blasphemy, no such thing as "liquid chocolate", unless it is liquefied by the application of heat! :p

    What's the category and AoE or strength of this supposed to be?
    This nation is a plant-based hivemind. It's current ambassador for interacting with humanoids is a bipedal plant creature standing at almost two metres tall. In IC in the WA.
    My main nation is Araraukar.
    Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
    - Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant

    User avatar
    In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia
    Secretary
     
    Posts: 39
    Founded: Jun 21, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:47 am

    Tinhampton wrote: (hint: GA#4 and GA#23 exist).

    Tis why that section is recommendations only.

    User avatar
    In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia
    Secretary
     
    Posts: 39
    Founded: Jun 21, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:50 am

    Potted Plants United wrote:OOC: Blasphemy, no such thing as "liquid chocolate", unless it is liquefied by the application of heat! :p

    What's the category and AoE or strength of this supposed to be?

    Category: Regulation
    AoE: Consumer Protection

    User avatar
    Morover
    Ambassador
     
    Posts: 1557
    Founded: Oct 14, 2018
    Ex-Nation

    Postby Morover » Tue Jul 13, 2021 11:13 am

    Jack Smith, Commercial Lawyer at the Morovian Department on the World Assembly.

    "I fail to see the need for such a resolution, and the preamble fails to make an adequate argument. If individuals in World Assembly nations are truly consuming the amount of chocolate as you posit, then that is a health risk in and of itself. There is the possibility for something in broader food standards, but chocolate is such a non-concern, I feel odd even talking about it."
    World Assembly Author
    ns.morover@gmail.com

    User avatar
    In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia
    Secretary
     
    Posts: 39
    Founded: Jun 21, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia » Tue Jul 13, 2021 11:39 am

    Hanovereich wrote:including food with no cocoa- can become chocolate flavoured?

    This is technically already true irl, as there are chocolate flavorings that have no cocoa whatsoever.

    User avatar
    Hanovereich
    Diplomat
     
    Posts: 899
    Founded: Jun 24, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby Hanovereich » Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:12 pm

    Even if that is true (and I can find nothing supporting your claim), I direct you to Tinhampton's argument:

    Tinhampton wrote:and the second half belongs in a resolution generally covering child and forced labour rather than one about how chocolate ought to be advertised


    And clause 2d says two different things- cannot be 'sold' and cannot be 'advertised'. So, can it be advertised as chocolate? And the definition of 'chocolate' in 2d is also vague- what do you mean by 'as chocolate'? Does it mean it cannot contain chocolate, be advertised as chocolate, or both?
    A Brit who just likes P2TM, political/geopolitical RPs.

    User avatar
    In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia
    Secretary
     
    Posts: 39
    Founded: Jun 21, 2021
    Ex-Nation

    Postby In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia » Tue Jul 13, 2021 3:23 pm

    Hanovereich wrote:Even if that is true (and I can find nothing supporting your claim)

    Would you like some links to products that follow that distinction?

    User avatar
    Araraukar
    Post Marshal
     
    Posts: 15869
    Founded: May 14, 2007
    Corrupt Dictatorship

    Postby Araraukar » Thu Jul 15, 2021 4:56 am

    In Insulam Autem Sanguis Et Magia wrote:1. Defines "chocolate" as a preparation derived from the seeds of the cacao plant that is made in the form of a liquid, paste, powder, or block.

    *snip*

    1. Dark, Unsweetened, or Pure Chocolate: the product must have a minimum cocoa content of 60%.
    2. Milk Chocolate: the product must have a minimum cocoa content of 35%.
    3. White Chocolate: the product must contain a minimum of 20% cocoa butter.

    OOC: Got some issues with all ^that. "Cacao" and "cocoa" are not synonyms. So I'd pick one or the other, not use both. Also, why require white chocolate to have cocoa butter yet not require it of other chocolate types at all? Palm oils and milk fats good enough for other chocolates? What's the point then? Or alternatively, the other chocolates might be mostly cocoa butter and not have cocoa solids at all (aka be white chocolate) and still fit the categories. Also, dark chocolate is not normally unsweetened. Unsweetened chocolate is incredibly bitter and not eaten as is by anyone. Well okay food masochists probably exist but it's not sold as dark chocolate.

    Additionally, Fazer Blue is a milk chocolate that only has 30% "cocoa solids" (which are the "chocolate taste", not cocoa butter) and it is considered too dark for milk chocolate by just about all my foreign friends . (Which might be because it's fat content comes from fresh milk and cocoa butter instead of palm oil and whatever cheaper filler materials.)

    So I suggest learning a bit more about chocolate first. Read the articles I linked to, for starters.

    Also, you use list code very weirdly. If you quote my post, see what I did to your a-b-c list in the quote and use that in the proposal. If you need more help with it, I can post the fixed code for you.

    EDIT: You could define "cocoa" with your current definition for chocolate.
    Last edited by Araraukar on Thu Jul 15, 2021 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
    - ambassador miss Janis Leveret
    Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
    Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
    Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.


    Advertisement

    Remove ads

    Return to General Assembly

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users

    Advertisement

    Remove ads