Jedinsto wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:
If a nation is committing atrocities, they are most likely already violating WA law, so I don’t think they’d care much about adhering to his one, especially if it would help them.
Also, if you have agreed to meet with another party to exchange POWs, it should be your responsibility to ensure that all potential risks are handled. I don’t see how that’s the WA’s business at all.
For the first part, you're probably right about that. How about if they're not violating WA law? And, for the second part I disagree. Member nations put forth their money and stuff collectively and then can use this committee for mutual benefit and such when they need it.
If it isn't violating WA law, then it is probably not an "atrocity" or something similar anyway. And if nations are putting for their money and whatnot, they should be paying for their own neutral mediators, not getting the WA to do their dirty work for them.