NationStates

The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into a foreign country has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in the affected country.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

"Not an international issue. Opposed."

Jedinsto wrote:

Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into a foreign country has often been ignored,

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

B. The increasing of safety in the affected country.

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

"Not an international issue. Opposed."

Fixed. Is it better?

Traden wrote:

Jedinsto wrote:"Not an international issue. Opposed."

Fixed. Is it better?

What I mean is immigration laws, funding whatever border control you want, etc. is best handled by national government, not the General Assembly. Short answer- no.

Why do you think this should be an international issue as opposed to one that individual states can easily handle?

Ambassador Tappe: "I fail to see any benefits that this proposal would create. Stopping 'illegal' immigration is not itself a virtue."

OOC: Clause D does not make sense.

Just make illegal immigration illegal and magical compliance will take care of the rest.

"Ambassador, this is a national issue and should remain as such. We can't find anything to justify making such absurdly vague measures international law."

Traden wrote:The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

"Yes, most often by national governments who ignore international law on the humane treatment of refugees and other migrants in order to satisfy their most ignorant and fearful citizens. But I get the feeling that's not really what you're talking about here."

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

"Why would you be disgusted at the elimination of inefficiencies? Or more to the point, why should we be disgusted?"

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

"Why would a country make immigration illegal? If you do that, people can't come open interesting new restaurants and taco trucks! More importantly, freedom of movement is as important to basic liberty as freedom of speech or ingestion. It ought to be curtailed as little as possible, and only then under careful consideration."

B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

Leo laughs hysterically for a few moments. A tear in his eye, he gasps, "Joke or draft proposals are debated in the other chamber, down the hall, sir. Seriously, you could do standup with that deadpan delivery."

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

"Please, ambassador. When you assume you make an 'ass' of 'u' and 'me.'. Is this simple truth not taught in schools any longer?"

"Nah. In brief, Ambassador, we find this proposal pointless as well as vague. No support."

Purely out of morbid curiosity, how would my learned colleague from Traden define Illegal Immigration?

Here's a more detailed critique of your rather ineffective draft:

The World Assembly,

Noting that immigration laws into foreign countries has often been ignored,

Often ignored by who?

Disgusted by the methods of illegal immigration, such as destroying inefficent walls,

How is that a method?

Believing that better protection to stop illegal immigration will do the following:

A. The elimination of illegal immigration.

You can't eliminate illegal immigration. It will always happen as people from countries torn apart by war or other crises often want to go to richer and more stable countries for a better life.

B. The increasing of safety in countries around the world.

How does that "increasing of safety?"

Assuming that the above mentioned are reasons why anti-illegal immigration defenses should be improved,

You haven't gotten any good reasoning for that.

Hereby declares the following:

A. The height and lean increasement of border walls.

Does nothing. Also, illegal immigration can happen via air and water travel.

B. Better identification of outfits for all border personnel.

Not very effective.

C. Increased amount of security guards to make sure no one passes illegally.

Not very necessary.

D. Ban of harmful objects for all immigrants.

Not feasible.

Edit: I see you have already submitted it without even consulting a lot of the advice given from others. It's not a well-written resolution and it's not an issue for the GA to resolve.