by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:13 pm
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:22 pm
by Cavirfi » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:24 pm
CAVIRFI ONE: #BoycottCavirfi movement enters Day 203; CBCC-Cavirfite Wing Strike enters Day 181 | 529 days left until Federal Police inaugurated, Training enters Day 203 | Crabaiaian Electoral Board declares 2023 Federal Election to be held on July 9 for Amine and Imguria and July 16 for the rest of the country | Chano-Cavirfite Sea Storm hits Cavirfi at wind speeds of 54 km/h, causes mild damage; Inauguration of new Great Tribunal, Technocratic Council, and Ministers postponed indefinitely | Average Weather: 20.91℃
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:25 pm
by Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:27 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:The World Assembly,
General Assembly Resolution #10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act” Shall Be Repealed
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that this Resolution could lead to more violence and more hatredforamong WA member states
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Noting that this Resolution grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that the World Assembly must take action to avoid violence,hatred, and death,
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Hereby Repeals General Assembly Proposal # 10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”
Please Tell Me Mistakes I Made. Lets Have A Civil Discussion And Not An Argument Please.
by Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:27 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Ah man! I messed up. Should I create another page or keep this one up?
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:31 pm
Frontier Isles wrote:Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:The World Assembly,
General Assembly Resolution #10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act” Shall Be Repealed
This first line is kind of redundent because the title of your proposal would be "Repeal 'Nuclear Arms Possession Act'"; it would be better if you recognized the passage of GAR #10, rather than saying that you're going to repeal it.Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that this Resolution could lead to more violence and more hatredforamong WA member states
Please elaborate.Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Noting that this Resolution grants the right to uranium mining that could lead to widespread cancer
I mean, all nations have the right to mine for uranium, so I don't see a reason for adding this clause.Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Realizing that the World Assembly must take action to avoid violence,hatred, and death,
I see what you mean, but it doesn't really explain why we should repeal it.Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Hereby Repeals General Assembly Proposal # 10 “Nuclear Arms Possession Act”
Please Tell Me Mistakes I Made. Lets Have A Civil Discussion And Not An Argument Please.
If you want to repeal GAR #10, then you're going to have to explain why GAR #10 doesn't work. You have to acknowledge and explain the problems in GAR #10, not just state your opinion.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:33 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Frontier Isles wrote:This first line is kind of redundent because the title of your proposal would be "Repeal 'Nuclear Arms Possession Act'"; it would be better if you recognized the passage of GAR #10, rather than saying that you're going to repeal it.
Please elaborate.
I mean, all nations have the right to mine for uranium, so I don't see a reason for adding this clause.
I see what you mean, but it doesn't really explain why we should repeal it.
If you want to repeal GAR #10, then you're going to have to explain why GAR #10 doesn't work. You have to acknowledge and explain the problems in GAR #10, not just state your opinion.
Made a lot of mistakes. Do you think in this current from the proposal, if passed by delegates, has a chance of repealing GR #10?
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:33 pm
by Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:35 pm
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:37 pm
by Goraria » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:39 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Guess I’ll go and delete it then and remake it
News: A man has fallen into a river in lego city start by building the rescue helicopter. I am of goods at spellings and of grammer. NSstats is cringe.
by Frontier Isles » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:40 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:Guess I’ll go and delete it then and remake it
by Indiana Controlled Florida » Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:41 pm
by Outer Sparta » Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:35 pm
Indiana Controlled Florida wrote:I submitted it yesterday
by Junitaki-cho » Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:28 pm
by Scalizagasti » Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:35 pm
Junitaki-cho wrote:For clarity, since nobody here is particularly helpful, WA proposals are usually posted in the forums for editing and feedback and go through multiple revisions before being formally submitted. Common practices are to format the thread title as [DRAFT] Proposal Name - which you can edit by going to your first post here - and to be responsive to input from other users. GAR#10 is probably a tough one to repeal since people have pretty strong feelings about it, so you'll want to really consider your arguments and writing to increase your odds.
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:35 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Barfleur, Fachumonn, The Ice States
Advertisement