NATION

PASSWORD

"reductive categorization"

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Neo-Notre Patrie
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Dec 02, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

"reductive categorization"

Postby Neo-Notre Patrie » Wed Feb 10, 2021 11:42 pm

"or another arbitrary, reductive categorisation" is vague. For one, I'm unsure about banning "hatred", so much as banning encouraging actual harm, that could be risky in my mind. Additionally, removing freedom of assembly from anyone could martyr the cause anyway.

Otherwise if it stayed, I believe it should either be adopted to existing minority groups, or not count categories of people such as cops or businessmen doing acts alleged to be involved in corruption or the abuse of people's civil/political rights. I'd err on creating exceptions for what can be considered IF this part of the law was to go through, rather than specify them (such as saying any LGBTQ/BIPOC/etc because it could adapt slower than society does with beuracracy.)

Could you claim the police are a category? Or members of a political party? This could create a loophole that way.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8000
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:42 am

Last edited by Tinhampton on Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549
Other achievements: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; -45 Darkspawn Kill Points; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; "Tinhampton? the man's literally god"
Who am I, really? 45yo Tory woman; Cambridge graduate; possibly very controversial; currently reading your mind >:D


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cha Grady, South St Maarten

Advertisement

Remove ads