NationStates

Will join back for such a proposal. Too lazy to write it in format.

OOC: There is no operative clause, no mandate. This is a blog post. Also, using dollars as you did is not permitted in the GA. That's a real-world reference.

Greater Cesnica wrote:OOC: There is no operative clause, no mandate. This is a blog post. Also, using dollars as you did is not permitted in the GA. That's a real-world reference.

ooc: Thank you for the feed back but it's not a real world reference. Close the wealth gap in the bio and stop governments in the game in have 100% tax on all. If your able to help submit something that will work... Thank you I want my nations wealth gap closed and low tax........

Game mechanics violation too, as it tries to set an upper limit on tax rate.

Why oh why didn't you draft this here first?

The New California Republic wrote:Game mechanics violation too, as it tries to set an upper limit on tax rate.

Why oh why didn't you draft this here first?

Well if it's rejected by the WA I'll redraft it here.

Texkentuck wrote:

Greater Cesnica wrote:OOC: There is no operative clause, no mandate. This is a blog post. Also, using dollars as you did is not permitted in the GA. That's a real-world reference.

ooc: Thank you for the feed back but it's not a real world reference. Close the wealth gap in the bio and stop governments in the game in have 100% tax on all. If your able to help submit something that will work... Thank you

Sorry but you are wrong here. Dollars has been deemed to be a RL reference in previous examples where proposals have been marked illegal for that exact reason.

And as I just said you can't set an upper limit on income tax rates as that's a game mechanics violation.

00C I'm leaving the WA. This is joke............

Texkentuck wrote:00C I'm leaving the WA. This is joke............

...you are annoyed that people are pointing out the flaws in this submission?

Seconds ago: Texkentuck resigned from the World Assembly.

...lol.

The New California Republic wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:00C I'm leaving the WA. This is joke............

...you are annoyed that people are pointing out the flaws in this submission?

Seconds ago: Texkentuck resigned from the World Assembly.

...lol.

ooc No it's just too much....Just want it to be simple. Being in the WA is complicated. ..................

Texkentuck wrote:No it's just too much....Just want it to be simple. Being in the WA is complicated....................

Sure, sure.

OOC: The WA's neat but I don't like formatting. I enjoyed having a vote but IDK

The New California Republic wrote:

Texkentuck wrote:

ooc: Thank you for the feed back but it's not a real world reference. Close the wealth gap in the bio and stop governments in the game in have 100% tax on all. If your able to help submit something that will work... Thank you

Sorry but you are wrong here. Dollars has been deemed to be a RL reference in previous examples where proposals have been marked illegal for that exact reason.

And as I just said you can't set an upper limit on income tax rates as that's a game mechanics violation.

00C I agree after seeing what is a proposal.I pulled the proposal. The WA was fun but it's not what I thought it was. Still neat but IDK WA is too WA ish for me...................

Come back to drafting when you're willing to follow basic WA rules and guidelines.

Texkentuck wrote:OOC: The WA's neat but I don't like formatting. I enjoyed having a vote but IDK

It wasn't the formatting that was the problem, it was the content itself that broke all kinds of WA rules.

Texkentuck wrote:OOC: The WA's neat but I don't like formatting. I enjoyed having a vote but IDK

Ooc: Not everybody can handle the rigors of drafting. It's OK to find something you're better at and avoid the GA.