Advertisement
by WayNeacTia » Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:16 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Silvedania » Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:12 am
News:All trade with Crabaiaia and Pikala has stopped as diplomats meet in Trenaka. Silvedanians are confused by Quentin Tarantulatino's new film, Seasonal Snackbox(This is a Bojack Horseman reference.) Weird song goes viral for making no sense.
Being president looks like the worst job in the world. -John Mulaney
by Pope Saint Peter the Apostle » Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:23 am
Wayneactia wrote:"While we do not impose the death penalty for any crimes committed within our borders, we recognize the right of other sovereign nations to punish their criminals as they see fit. This proposal is nothing more than the complete decimation of national sovereignty and we will absolutely not support it in any way."
Wayne
by Greater Cesnica » Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:27 am
Wayneactia wrote:"While we do not impose the death penalty for any crimes committed within our borders, we recognize the right of other sovereign nations to punish their criminals as they see fit. This proposal is nothing more than the complete decimation of national sovereignty and we will absolutely not support it in any way."
Wayne
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Marxist Germany » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:13 am
by Keswickholt » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:47 am
by Tinhampton » Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:12 am
by Grays Harbor » Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:42 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Alexander Smith, Tinhamptonian Delegate-Ambassador to the World Assembly: Senator Harrison, I take it that that you would support a repeal of the resolution On Female Genital Mutilation on the grounds that Keswickholtian legislation forbids such a practice and it is not the World Assembly's business to declare it or any other practice a criminal offence?
(IC AND OOC: SUPPORT)
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:44 pm
by Bananaistan » Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:12 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:06 pm
by Tinhampton » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:20 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:I'd rather pass what is more likely passable than go full moralist and end up with UM's two failed attempts at an absolute ban.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:21 pm
Pope Saint Peter the Apostle wrote:Wayneactia wrote:"While we do not impose the death penalty for any crimes committed within our borders, we recognize the right of other sovereign nations to punish their criminals as they see fit. This proposal is nothing more than the complete decimation of national sovereignty and we will absolutely not support it in any way."
Wayne
"Ambassador, if nations have a right to 'punish their criminals as they see fit,' should bans on torture be repealed?"
Greater Cesnica wrote:Wayneactia wrote:"While we do not impose the death penalty for any crimes committed within our borders, we recognize the right of other sovereign nations to punish their criminals as they see fit. This proposal is nothing more than the complete decimation of national sovereignty and we will absolutely not support it in any way."
Wayne
"Ambassador, by joining this Assembly, a nation agrees to follow the mandate and will of this body. Non-compliant nations are shunned, even condemned. I suppose since we're talking about national sovereignty, that the General Assembly shouldn't prohibit genocide, right? A nation would have the right to purge their citizens of "undesirables", right? Of course not."
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Sylh Alanor » Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:07 pm
by Hookah Castle » Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:34 pm
by Bananaistan » Sun Jan 17, 2021 2:34 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:I'd rather pass what is more likely passable than go full moralist and end up with UM's two failed attempts at an absolute ban.
by Tinfect » Sun Jan 17, 2021 2:51 am
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Kenmoria » Sun Jan 17, 2021 4:38 am
by Einherjarstein » Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:55 am
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:03 am
Einherjarstein wrote:My people are safe. They are fed, they make a good income, homelessness has been eradicated, and their healthcare is free. Make no mistake, the laws of Einherjarstein are strict. But my people are aware of the laws of their country. They are aware of the consequences of breaking those laws. Because of the threat of corporal and capital punishment, the citizens of Einherjarstein are in the bottom 10% of the world's crime rate.
We do not keep prisoners on death row for years awaiting trial. Evidence is gathered, a suspect is determined, and brought before a judge. If judged innocent, the accused is free to go; exonerated of the crime. If found guilty, punishment will be dealt out in accordance with the laws of our sovereign state. If capital punishment is warranted, it is done in public, and my citizens will vote on how the condemned shall be executed.
Since my citizens are fully aware of their laws, and are complicit in choosing the type of capital punishment used to execute their fellow Einherjarsteiners, why should the death penalty be banned in Einherjarstein?
by Greater Cesnica » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:22 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Einherjarstein wrote:My people are safe. They are fed, they make a good income, homelessness has been eradicated, and their healthcare is free. Make no mistake, the laws of Einherjarstein are strict. But my people are aware of the laws of their country. They are aware of the consequences of breaking those laws. Because of the threat of corporal and capital punishment, the citizens of Einherjarstein are in the bottom 10% of the world's crime rate.
We do not keep prisoners on death row for years awaiting trial. Evidence is gathered, a suspect is determined, and brought before a judge. If judged innocent, the accused is free to go; exonerated of the crime. If found guilty, punishment will be dealt out in accordance with the laws of our sovereign state. If capital punishment is warranted, it is done in public, and my citizens will vote on how the condemned shall be executed.
Since my citizens are fully aware of their laws, and are complicit in choosing the type of capital punishment used to execute their fellow Einherjarsteiners, why should the death penalty be banned in Einherjarstein?
"Because courts are inherently fallible and the death penalty is irreversible. And because subordinating justice to mob rule invites abuse."
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Sierra Lyricalia » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:39 am
Tinfect wrote:OOC:
Presuming the current draft allows Member-States to execute the perpetrators of genocide and other such war crimes, this is actually acceptable.
by Picairn » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:56 am
by Boston Castle » Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:48 pm
by Bananaistan » Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:55 am
Kenmoria wrote:Bananaistan wrote:OOC: What you have here will block a full ban.
(OOC: How would it? Clause 1 doesn’t reserve the right for member nations the right to determine the status of capital punishment for war crimes; it just means that this particular piece of legislation isn’t making any mandate on the issue.)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fachumonn
Advertisement