Daarwyrth wrote:South St Maarten wrote:1. Yes, I should replace dual with multiple. Will do so in Draft X.
2. What if there was a revision to clause 5 such as the following (just an example):
All children shall attain their citizenship(s) immediately at birth and must retain them in perpetuity, unless one of the following occurs:1. They are given up
2. They are revoked or otherwise stripped in accordance with procedures set forth by law.
3. If one of the multiple citizenships of a person has been passed down more than three generations without any of the three generations living in that nation, such nation reserves the right to terminate such citizenship when the fourth generation reaches the age of majority.
I know that is a run on sentence but I'll fix that. I'd appreciate your thoughts on that general idea
Dame Maria vyn Nysen: "The proposed amendement alleviates my nation's concerns. In my opinion, it solves the issue with multiple citizenships being granted in perpetuity. There is only one remark that I have left on this passage, namely "procedures set forth by law". Forgive me, Ambassador, if it is our status as relative newcomers in the WA speaking, but does "law" in this clause refer to national law, or WA law? In other words, does this clause grant individual member nations the ability to legislate on this subject, or does it bestow this right upon the General Assembly? Or both, even?"
I envisioned it as both, although I do not know if the WA currently has any legislation on the matter of revocation.