NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Repeal "GMO International Trade Accord"

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Regnum Italiae
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Jul 19, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Regnum Italiae » Sun Oct 18, 2020 9:06 am

Honeydewistania wrote:
since there are no overseeing authorities; and


Minor correction.

Thanks
Home Secretary of Europe
WA Resolution Author
Generally a quiet guy

User avatar
Regnum Italiae
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Jul 19, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Regnum Italiae » Wed Oct 28, 2020 4:53 am

I think this proposal is solid enough to be submitted.
I'll wait another couple of days then I'll proceed.
Home Secretary of Europe
WA Resolution Author
Generally a quiet guy

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Wed Oct 28, 2020 5:39 am

Regnum Italiae wrote:The exclusion of genetic modifications obtained through hybridisation or selective breeding as a result of the limited definition of biotechnology, which poses comparable threats to the environment;


which pose, not which poses

The lack of regulations of intellectual property, thus granting undisciplined privileges to corporations and private institutions, like the possibility to stop outside research or create monopolies, that undermine the resolution's call for improving research and the exchange of information between member nations; and


replace ‘that undermine’ to ‘which undermines’


Otherwise, quite solid.
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
Regnum Italiae
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Jul 19, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Regnum Italiae » Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:24 am

Honeydewistania wrote:which pose, not which poses

replace ‘that undermine’ to ‘which undermines’

Otherwise, quite solid.


Done, thanks for your help
Home Secretary of Europe
WA Resolution Author
Generally a quiet guy

User avatar
Cretox State
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1027
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Cretox State » Wed Nov 04, 2020 7:06 am

This has been submitted.
GA/SC/Issues author. Public Servant. Killer of Stats. Thought Leader. Influencer. P20 Laureate. Delegate Emeritus of thousands of regions.

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Wed Nov 04, 2020 7:11 am

Cretox State wrote:This has been submitted.

:o
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
South St Maarten
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Apr 16, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby South St Maarten » Fri Nov 06, 2020 6:53 am

Happy to give my full support for the proposal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former First & Second Deputy Commissioner Of Europe
European Undersecretary For Culture
European Ambassador To The Western Isles
Member Of The European Home & Foreign Offices

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of character unless noted otherwise. Any Questions, Comments, or Concerns, feel free to telegram me! :D

User avatar
Cobosia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Nov 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Cobosia » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:06 am

The act of repeal itself of the GMO International Trade Accord would result in no GMO regulation whatsoever — putting the WA member states in a much undesirable situation.
We should better vote FOR a reformulation of the Accord, not FOR a repeal.
Last edited by Cobosia on Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:09 am

Cobosia wrote:The act of repeal itself of the GMO International Trade Accord would result in no GMO regulation whatsoever — putting the WA member states in a much undesirable situation.
We should better vote FOR a reformulation of the Accord, not FOR a repeal.

A reformulation is impossible by current technical limitations, therefore a repeal and potentially a replacement if anyone wishes to write one is required instead.
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
Cobosia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Nov 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Cobosia » Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:09 am

Honeydewistania wrote:A reformulation is impossible by current technical limitations, therefore a repeal and potentially a replacement if anyone wishes to write one is required instead.

Could you please elaborate? What are the current technical limitations? Can't one just propose an edit of the resolution itself?

User avatar
Honeydewistania
Senator
 
Posts: 3875
Founded: Jun 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Honeydewistania » Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:14 am

Cobosia wrote:
Honeydewistania wrote:A reformulation is impossible by current technical limitations, therefore a repeal and potentially a replacement if anyone wishes to write one is required instead.

Could you please elaborate? What are the current technical limitations? Can't one just propose an edit of the resolution itself?

That is impossible my current game rules. Only a repeal and replacement can fix issues
Home of the first best pizza topping known to NationStates | Prolific Security Council Author (15x resolutions written) | Not that one fraud, Pineappleistania(ew) | Mouthpiece for Melons' first-rate SC takes | read this please

Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass

User avatar
United States of Americanas
Envoy
 
Posts: 328
Founded: Jan 23, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby United States of Americanas » Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:20 pm

Repeal without a replacement is an automatic decline. Good day to you.
Political Compass as of Jul 17 2022

Economic Left/Right: -7.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15



Damn right I’m a liberal democratic socialist. I sit in the ranks of Caroline Lucas

User avatar
Naribobastan
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jul 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Naribobastan » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:12 pm

Regnum Italiae wrote:
The World Assembly,

Acknowledging that regulation of trade of genetically modified organisms, which General Assembly Resolution #509 “GMO International Trade Accord” tried to address, is an important area of legislation most likely in need of attention from the World Assembly; but

Noting that unclear measures lead to unforeseen consequences which can do more harm than good;

Concerned by many issues, including:

  1. The exclusion of genetic modifications obtained through hybridisation or selective breeding as a result of the limited definition of biotechnology, which pose comparable threats to the environment;

  2. The resolution’s failure to explicitly require member nations to enforce regulations created by the Committee for the Regulation of Modified Products, allowing for nations to easily dodge compliance of these provisions without penalty;

  3. The vagueness of the term ‘reasonable’ that is used so often in regard to safety measures throughout the resolution, especially in sections 3 and 4, as the use of this term allows an excessively ambiguous and free interpretation of what is the best effort possible in the matter of safety. The term reasonable is in fact inherently relative in its definition and this implies that nations can set up measures as they see fit to their contingent situation, without any kind of control, thus making it possible for them to hugely disregard security when profitable;

  4. The lack of regulations of intellectual property, thus granting undisciplined privileges to corporations and private institutions, like the possibility to stop outside research or create monopolies, which undermines the resolution's call for improving research and the exchange of information between member nations; and

  5. The presence, in section 4, of exemptions to unsterilized plants GMOs, since requirements like “in cases where the environmental benefit [...] clearly outweigh any downsides of their use” are loose enough to let member nations set their own policies without any way to ascertain the truthfulness of their reasons especially since there are no overseeing authorities; and
Concluding that such overlooked flaws completely undermine the effectiveness of the resolution as a whole; hereby

Repeals General Assembly Resolution #509 “GMO International Trade Accord”.

Co-authored by Honeydewistania


Thanks to Imperium Anglorum and Honeydewistania for the inputs, comments and edits

Link to target resolution: https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_pa ... /council=1

The World Assembly,
Believing the good intentions of General Assembly Resolution #509 “GMO International Trade Accord”,

Acknowledging that regulation of trade of genetically modified organisms is an important goal to achieve which requires special attention and care, but
Noting that unclear measures lead to unforeseen consequences which can do more harm than good,

Concerned by many issues, including:
  • The exclusion of genetic modifications obtained through hybridisation or selective breeding as a result of the limited definition of biotechnology, which pose analogue threats to the environment;
  • The resolution’s failure to explicitly require member nations to enforce regulations created by the Committee for the Regulation of Modified Products, allowing for nations to easily dodge compliance of these provisions without penalty,
  • The vagueness of the term ‘reasonable’ that is used so often in regard of safety measures throughout the resolution, especially in sections 3 and 4, as the use of this term allows an excessively ambiguous and free interpretation of what is the best effort possible in matter of safety;
  • The lack of regulations of intellectual property, thus granting undisciplined privileges to corporations and privates like the possibility to stop outside research or create monopolies; and
  • The presence, in section 4, of exemptions to unsterilized plants GMOs, since requirements like “in cases where the environmental benefit [...] clearly outweigh any downsides of their use” are loose enough to let member nations set their own policies with little to no control from external authorities; and

Concluding that such overlooked flaws completely undermine the effectiveness of the resolution as a whole, hereby
Repeals General Assembly Resolution #509 “GMO International Trade Accord”.

why do you have to vote
for?
vote against because this is good to our economy

User avatar
Eluney
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Sep 02, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Eluney » Mon Nov 09, 2020 5:49 pm

“We will support this resolution, hoping that its replacement - if proposed - expressly establishes the power of the Nations to prohibit the use of GMOs”.

Mr. Carlos Alejandro Herrera.
Permanent Representative of the Federal Republic of Eluney to the World Assembly.
The Federal Republic of Eluney
Councillor in Union of Christian Nations
Moral compass: Matthew 25: 31-46
National Factbook Overview:
Posts IC unless marked otherwise.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads