Pope Saint Peter the Apostle wrote:Ambassador, I see no such contradiction in the cited clauses. Let me present two possible interpretations of WAJA's 4th clause and explain why neither contradicts clause 3 of this proposal.
One could interpret clause 4 of WAJA as declaring that nations may sue - when particular criteria are met - in the courts set up by the World Assembly Judiciary Committee (hereafter "JudComm") in the WAJA.
"One could not, by your own admission, make this interpretation. World Assembly Justice Accord grants the aforementioned rights to "any entity within the jurisdiction of any member state". You yourself assert that:
Sancta Romana Ecclesia wrote:I don't believe a nation can be tried under GAR#466, as it is not an entity within its own jurisdiction, it is an entity that has this jurisdiction.
"Thus showing that the protections afforded under World Assembly Justice Accord extend to non-state entities."
In that case, clause 3 of the SJA simply reaffirms this mandate, and in addition prohibits foreign affected legal persons from suing outside these JudComm courts.
"'In addition' is contradiction where it interferes with the mandates of passed resolutions, as this resolution does."
On the other hand, if we accept clause 4 as a more general mandate that persons be allowed to sure when the given criteria are met, this proposal would still not contradict it, for it only limits the venues by which suit can be brought, but in no way prevents people from using this venue to sue.
"Such limitations necessarily contradict World Assembly Justice Accord. My office's resolution does not allow the World Assembly to make amendments to it, or to install exceptions for the rights it mandates. By prohibiting individuals from bringing suits against governments under the jurisdiction of member states, you necessarily contradict the rather straightforward mandate of:
any entity within the jurisdiction of any member state may bring charges against any other entity within the jurisdiction of any member state for damages done to them which violate the terms of extant World Assembly law
"I have underlined the bits you seem to have overlooked. Rest assured, if this issue is not resolved prior to submission, I will have to file a motion to discard with the General Secretary Office."