NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Protecting Legal Rights of Workers

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

[PASSED] Protecting Legal Rights of Workers

Postby Cretox State » Tue Jul 07, 2020 2:50 pm

"The aim of this proposal is to build on the effects of prior resolutions that enshrine rights for workers, by ensuring that those rights can be enforced without fear of retaliation."

OOC: I know there might be some overlap here, and I have done my best to avoid duplication.

Edit: I feel this is ready for submission, and will be doing so later this week if there are no major issues.

Protecting Legal Rights of Workers

Category: Regulation
Area of Effect: Labor

The World Assembly,

Noting the importance of protecting the right of workers to be free from mistreatment and exploitation;

Recognizing the efforts of prior resolutions enacted by this most excellent body to enumerate key rights and ensure that workers' rights can be judicially enforced;

Concerned that the inherently unequal bargaining positions of workers and their employers leave the former open to coercion and the threat of retaliation with respect to enforcing their rights;

Understanding that protecting the ability of workers to seek relief for violations of their rights furthers the public interest and protects commerce, hereby:
  1. Defines:
    1. an "employment dispute" as any dispute arising between an employer and one or more individuals or their authorized representative concerning a work relationship between them;
    2. an "arbitration agreement" as any agreement to arbitrate a dispute;
  2. Declares:
    1. subject to extant World Assembly resolutions, no arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable with respect to an employment dispute unless:
      1. the agreement was not mandated by the employer, made a condition of employment or any employment-related benefit, or effected through coercion;
      2. each individual entering into the agreement was informed in sufficiently plain writing of their right to refuse the agreement without fear of retaliation, in addition to any other protections they may have pertaining to the signing of the agreement;
      3. each individual entering into the agreement received a period of at least 30 days to accept or reject the agreement; and
      4. each individual entering into the agreement affirmatively consented to the agreement in writing;
    2. no employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against an individual for refusing to enter into an agreement that provides for arbitration of an employment dispute;
    3. no employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against an individual for seeking judicial enforcement of their rights;
  3. Clarifies:
    1. no arbitrator shall determine the applicability of this resolution to an agreement to arbitrate;
    2. nothing in this resolution shall apply to any agreement between an employer or a labor organization, or between labor organizations, unless said agreement has the effect of waiving the ability of an individual to seek legal enforcement of their rights;
  4. Urges member nations to protect the rights of workers and ensure that those rights can be legally enforced.
Last edited by Ransium on Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:03 am, edited 13 times in total.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Tue Jul 07, 2020 2:51 pm

Legal Access for Workers

Category: Regulation
Area of Effect: Labor

The World Assembly,

Noting the importance of protecting the right of workers to be free from mistreatment and exploitation;

Recognizing the efforts of prior resolutions enacted by this most excellent body to enumerate key rights and ensure that workers' rights can be judicially enforced;

Concerned that the inherently unequal bargaining positions of workers and their employers leave the former open to coercion and the threat of retaliation with respect to enforcing their rights;

Understanding that protecting the ability of workers to seek relief for violations of their rights furthers the public interest and protects commerce, hereby:
  1. Defines:
    1. an "employment dispute" as any dispute arising between an employer and one or more individuals or their authorized representative concerning a work relationship between them;
    2. a "predispute arbitration agreement" as any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the agreement;
    3. a "postdispute arbitration agreement" as any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that arose before the time of the agreement;
    4. a "collective bargaining waiver" as any agreement prohibiting membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment;
  2. Prohibits all collective bargaining waivers;
  3. Affirms that no predispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable with respect to an employment dispute;
  4. Declares:
    1. no postdispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable with respect to an employment dispute unless:
      1. the agreement was not mandated by the employer, made a condition of employment or any employment-related benefit, or effected through coercion;
      2. each individual entering into the agreement was informed in sufficiently plain writing of their right to refuse the agreement without fear of retaliation, in addition to any other protections they may have pertaining to the signing of the agreement;
      3. each individual received a reasonable period of time to accept or reject the agreement; and
      4. each individual affirmatively consented to the agreement in writing;
    2. no employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against an individual for refusing to enter into an agreement that provides for arbitration of an employment dispute;
    3. no employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against an individual for seeking judicial enforcement of their rights;
  5. Clarifies:
    1. the applicability of this resolution to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which this resolution applies shall not be determined by an arbitrator;
    2. nothing in this resolution shall apply to any agreement between an employer or a labor organization, or between labor organizations, unless said agreement has the effect of waiving the ability of an individual to seek legal enforcement of their rights;
  6. Urges member nations to protect the rights of workers and ensure that those rights can be legally enforced.
Last edited by Cretox State on Thu Jul 09, 2020 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15449
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:16 am

OOC: What are "collective bargaining waivers", and didn't we just pass a resolution on the arbitration thing?
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 08, 2020 9:12 am

Araraukar wrote:OOC: What are "collective bargaining waivers", and didn't we just pass a resolution on the arbitration thing?

OOC: Yellow-dog contracts, basically. This proposal is mostly intended to fill holes in prior resolutions, primarily concerning collective bargaining and retaliation. If it seems too redundant, I won't move forward with it.
Last edited by Cretox State on Wed Jul 08, 2020 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Comfed
Diplomat
 
Posts: 892
Founded: Apr 09, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Comfed » Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:51 am

I like this one! I would vote for it if it came up for vote.
Mall:
Best part about being a mod was engaging in normal player behavior and getting accused of abuse
"You think this is abuse? I'll SHOW you abuse."
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:In the liberal justice system, raiding-based offenses are considered especially heinous. In The South Pacific, the dedicated defenders who investigate these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as the Council on Regional Security. These are their proscriptions. DUN DUN.

Numero Capitan wrote:I haven't bothered reading back but I can unequivocally say that I agree with everything HEM has said and Unibot is wrong

Put this in your sig if you passed biology and know that gender and sex are not the same thing.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8021
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:14 pm

Delegate-Ambassador Alexander Smith: Another day, another fuzzy-wuzzy title from my... Cretox Statean colleague, probably. May I suggest "Arbitration Agreements Accord"?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549
Other achievements: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; -45 Darkspawn Kill Points; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; "Tinhampton? the man's literally god"
Who am I, really? 45yo Tory woman; Cambridge graduate; possibly very controversial; currently reading your mind >:D

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15449
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:42 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: What are "collective bargaining waivers", and didn't we just pass a resolution on the arbitration thing?

OOC: Yellow-dog contracts, basically.

OOC: I read most of that. I repeat, with slight addendum: what are "collective bargaining waivers" in relation to the proposal? Where does the collective bargaining come into it? Based on your source they're personal work contracts, illegal ones at that - including in the WA nations. So exactly what hole are you supposed to be plugging?
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Thu Jul 09, 2020 7:21 am

Araraukar wrote:

OOC: I read most of that. I repeat, with slight addendum: what are "collective bargaining waivers" in relation to the proposal? Where does the collective bargaining come into it? Based on your source they're personal work contracts, illegal ones at that - including in the WA nations. So exactly what hole are you supposed to be plugging?

OOC: Since it seems to be redundant (and probably duplication), I removed the collective bargaining part entirely.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:31 am

OOC: Doing a feedback bump on this. I do understand that the topic matter is inherently niche, but I feel it's an important one to address.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Flying Eagles
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Nov 04, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flying Eagles » Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:16 am

The title needs to answer the question "Legal Access to what?" To puppies? To lunch breaks? To video games?

Is there anyway you can avoid the use of the word "reasonable" in 3aiii, as it's inherently vague?

OOC: 4a means what in Plain English? I'm just a teenager.
Last edited by Flying Eagles on Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
I say dumb things sometimes. Sorry.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:20 am

Flying Eagles wrote:The title needs to answer the question "Legal Access to what?" To puppies? To lunch breaks? To video games?

"Access... to the legal system? It would be similar to saying 'Golf Access for Businessmen'."

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Flying Eagles
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Nov 04, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flying Eagles » Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:24 am

Cretox State wrote:
Flying Eagles wrote:The title needs to answer the question "Legal Access to what?" To puppies? To lunch breaks? To video games?

"Access... to the legal system? It would be similar to saying 'Golf Access for Businessmen'."

The delegation from Tinhampton suggested "Arbitration Agreements Accord". Could that work?

OOC: I edited in a few more comments to my previous post.
I say dumb things sometimes. Sorry.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 15, 2020 2:39 pm

Flying Eagles wrote:Is there anyway you can avoid the use of the word "reasonable" in 3aiii, as it's inherently vague?

I set the period to 30 days.

Flying Eagles wrote:OOC: 4a means what in Plain English? I'm just a teenager.

If a predispute agreement mandates the use of an arbitrator, the arbitrator can't say that this resolution doesn't apply to him.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10345
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jul 15, 2020 5:18 pm

Cretox State wrote:If a predispute agreement mandates the use of an arbitrator, the arbitrator can't say that this resolution doesn't apply to him.

Say this.

Author: 1 SC and 42 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:00 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
Cretox State wrote:If a predispute agreement mandates the use of an arbitrator, the arbitrator can't say that this resolution doesn't apply to him.

Say this.

Edited. I think that should work.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Flying Eagles
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Nov 04, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flying Eagles » Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:38 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Say this.

Edited. I think that should work.

Yep, although it would cover postdispute agreements too. Dunno if that’s what you intended.
I say dumb things sometimes. Sorry.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:46 pm

Flying Eagles wrote:
Cretox State wrote:Edited. I think that should work.

Yep, although it would cover postdispute agreements too. Dunno if that’s what you intended.

That's intentional, since this proposal places restrictions on the validity of postdispute agreements.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Flying Eagles
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Nov 04, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flying Eagles » Wed Jul 15, 2020 7:49 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Flying Eagles wrote:Yep, although it would cover postdispute agreements too. Dunno if that’s what you intended.

That's intentional, since this proposal places restrictions on the validity of postdispute agreements.

OOC: Just making sure, as your plain English translation only covered predispute agreements
I say dumb things sometimes. Sorry.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15449
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:21 am

Cretox State wrote:
Flying Eagles wrote:The title needs to answer the question "Legal Access to what?" To puppies? To lunch breaks? To video games?

"Access... to the legal system? It would be similar to saying 'Golf Access for Businessmen'."

OOC: 1. It doesn't actually mention anything about access to the legal system (word "access" is not used even once in the proposal text), 2. the category/AoE is probably wrong as from what I can see, you're trying to give workers more rights instead of restricting them (unless the category/AoE combo has some hidden effect I'm not aware of), 3. given previous resolutions, how wouldn't workers ALREADY have access to the legal systems?, and 4. I still don't get how the wording follows from your example, as "Golf Access for Businessmen" sounds like it's lacking a word or several. And also, "Golf" at first brough the car to mind.
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.
Apologies for absences, RL has been hectic, nothing to do with COVID-19, I'm just busy with other things than NS.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:23 am

Araraukar wrote:OOC: 1. It doesn't actually mention anything about access to the legal system (word "access" is not used even once in the proposal text)

OOC: The proposal prevents workers from being coerced into signing away their right to seek legal action, and prohibits retaliation for taking legal action. This is how the proposal ensures access to the legal system.

Araraukar wrote:2. the category/AoE is probably wrong as from what I can see, you're trying to give workers more rights instead of restricting them (unless the category/AoE combo has some hidden effect I'm not aware of)

According to the category guidelines: "Labor Rights: Protecting the workers from exploitation and dangerous conditions at the expense of corporate bottom lines." This proposal protects workers from being coerced into signing away their legal rights, thereby protecting them from exploitation (directly; you can't exploit workers' weaker bargaining position), and protecting them from all manner of dangerous conditions and unfair treatment (indirectly; workers can sue you if you illegally exploit them by, oh say, forcing them to handle toxic substances with no protection). It also protects workers from being retaliated against for enforcing their rights in court.

According to the "Regulation" boilerplate text: "A resolution to enact uniform standards that protect workers, consumers, and the general public."

Araraukar wrote:3. given previous resolutions, how wouldn't workers ALREADY have access to the legal systems?

They could be coerced into signing away their ability to take legal action. They could face retaliation for taking legal action in defense of their rights.

Araraukar wrote:4. I still don't get how the wording follows from your example, as "Golf Access for Businessmen" sounds like it's lacking a word or several. And also, "Golf" at first brough the car to mind.

I don't really see anything wrong with the title. "Ensuring Judicial Access for Workers," maybe?

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Flying Eagles
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Nov 04, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Flying Eagles » Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:12 pm

Cretox State wrote:I don't really see anything wrong with the title. "Ensuring Judicial Access for Workers," maybe?

We like that title, as it’s a lot less ambiguous.
I say dumb things sometimes. Sorry.

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:15 pm

Flying Eagles wrote:
Cretox State wrote:I don't really see anything wrong with the title. "Ensuring Judicial Access for Workers," maybe?

We like that title, as it’s a lot less ambiguous.

"Done."

Edit: I'll try and submit this at some point later in the week, if there are no objections.
Last edited by Cretox State on Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Attancia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 52
Founded: May 01, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Attancia » Mon Jul 20, 2020 6:25 am

"Well written, with the exception of the fact that it unfairly places power in the hands of the workers, first shown in Section 1. a. Opposed."
h

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Mon Jul 20, 2020 6:33 am

Attancia wrote:"Well written, with the exception of the fact that it unfairly places power in the hands of the workers, first shown in Section 1. a. Opposed."

"How does it 'unfairly' empower workers?"

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

User avatar
Cretox State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 808
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cretox State » Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:11 pm

OOC: Tentatively planning to submit later this week.

Edit: Looking to submit at major if there are no objections.
Last edited by Cretox State on Thu Jul 23, 2020 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

The North Pacific Vice Delegate
Author: 11 GA + 3 SC resolutions, 4 issues, and a lot of drafts

Killer of Stats
Assume OOC

"above the level of needing to be told how English works" - Candlewhisper Archive
"pure legalese" - Araraukar
"barrel of nonsense" - Tinhampton
"Just hurry up and declare a coup" - Honeydewistania
"a joke with no punchline" - Minskiev
"purge me daddy" - Praeceps
GA 496
GA 503 (1st in category)
GA 504
GA 509 (1st in category)
GA 510
GA 512
GA 520
GA 523
GA 527
GA 529
GA 530
GA 535*

SC 318
SC 331
SC 333

Issue 1427
Issue 1433
Issue 1438
Issue 1444

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Boston Castle, Daarwyrth, The Galactic American Imperium, The Plough Islands, The Python

Advertisement

Remove ads