by Zaberaz Hapang » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:04 am
by Honeydewistania » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:08 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Zaberaz Hapang » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:09 am
Honeydewistania wrote:Some typographical errors, get them checked out
by Honeydewistania » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:15 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:56 am
by Zaberaz Hapang » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:00 am
Kenmoria wrote:“I’ll have more feedback later. For the moment, it should be the General Assembly, not the Security Council, doing the repealing at the end. We don’t acknowledge the other chamber here.”
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:02 am
by Zaberaz Hapang » Thu Jul 09, 2020 9:55 am
by Araraukar » Thu Jul 09, 2020 10:13 am
Zaberaz Hapang wrote:Nobody else has comments?
Zaberaz Hapang wrote:CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, this rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void
NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises, and therefor is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.
FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which if it damages a business, it may even ruin it.
FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which force an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave doesn't work.
CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot to a male worker, considered excessive
Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for even a year, and should not happen like that, again, maternity paid leave
Co-Authored by Transvolcanic
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Zaberaz Hapang » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:16 pm
Araraukar wrote:Zaberaz Hapang wrote:Nobody else has comments?
OOC: Plenty of them:Zaberaz Hapang wrote:CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, this rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void
Grammar atrocities.NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises, and therefor is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.
Spelling. And also I don't quite understand this. You say maternity leave is not compulsory but that it is compulsory and can thus lead to economic collapse?FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which if it damages a business, it may even ruin it.
Grammar atrocity.
thank you, I will try to correct the 'grammar atrocities'FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which force an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave doesn't work.
Grammar atrocities.CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot to a male worker, considered excessive
Grammar atrocities, the whole clause. And pretty much incomprehensive, too.Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for even a year, and should not happen like that, again, maternity paid leave
Grammar atrocities.Co-Authored by Transvolcanic
Your co-author should help you more.
by Zaberaz Hapang » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:21 pm
by Anurial » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:54 pm
21st October
✉ Anarquía Mirror: 7 remaining Liberal MLAs form the Independent Group | International Mirror: Right-wing militias join Karsian military in fight against communist militias | Politipoll Weekly: PSF 42.3%, PDS 36.3%, SU 4.3%, AF 0.1%, CU 3.1%, PP 5.1%, Co 3.6%, IL 1.1%, CG 4.1%
by Araraukar » Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:19 pm
Zaberaz Hapang wrote:Any other comments that aren't because of grammar or spelling?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Zaberaz Hapang » Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:00 pm
Anurial wrote:I'm confused at the reasoning for wanting to repeal the resolution. Does it not go far enough or is it too restrictive on business?
by Tinhampton » Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:02 pm
Zaberaz Hapang wrote:General Assembly Resolution # 491 (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Acknowledging That Resolution #491 was a well-meaning article;
CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, these rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void.
NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises and therefore is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.
FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which it damages a business, it may even ruin it.
FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which it forces an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave.
CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot for a male worker, considered excessive.
Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for up to a year, and should not happen.
The General Asembly hereby repeals the 'Rights Of The Employed' Resolution.
Co-Authored by Transvolcanic
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement