NationStates

I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.

Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.

Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?

Otherwise, full support ;p

good effort but no the only way to raise your economy is to answer issues otherwise you can roleplay having a good economy in the forums.

Where's the proposal?

Outer Sparta wrote:Where's the proposal?

The OP didn't exactly provide one at the moment.

Considering they don't have the endorsements to even mechanically propose it yet, it doesn't seem much of a committed thing, illegality aside.

Komerco wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Where's the proposal?

The OP didn't exactly provide one at the moment.

Considering they don't have the endorsements to even mechanically propose it yet, it doesn't seem much of a committed thing, illegality aside.

I don't get why one would ask to have a proposal without even writing one in the first place. If they really want to inquire about one, there's a proper thread here in GA for it.

Komerco wrote:

Outer Sparta wrote:Where's the proposal?

The OP didn't exactly provide one at the moment.

Considering they don't have the endorsements to even mechanically propose it yet, it doesn't seem much of a committed thing, illegality aside.

They can join and get endorsements at any time

Honeydewistania wrote:

Komerco wrote:
The OP didn't exactly provide one at the moment.

Considering they don't have the endorsements to even mechanically propose it yet, it doesn't seem much of a committed thing, illegality aside.

They can join and get endorsements at any time

If they can find two more members in their new region.

Note to self: stay on the topic.

[[/quote]

Tinhampton wrote:

Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.

Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?

Otherwise, full support ;p

What’s game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics?

Game mechanics are how people play the game at its core, and cannot be modified willy-nilly for each and every law addition and/or repeal. (e.g. Issue responses and availability, or ideology)

Branding is basically referencing yourself in the proposal, which defeats it being a decision based with the consensus of all member nations.

Proposal basics are as was attached above in the thread by Tinhampton. It's the rulebook for what makes a draft permissible in the World Assembly, which covers game mechanics and branding among it.

Tinhampton wrote:

Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.

Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?

Otherwise, full support ;p

Ekukao wrote:What’s game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics?

They're basic guidelines for WA resolutions. You can't propose something that changes gameplay.

Ekukao wrote:

Tinhampton wrote:Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?

Otherwise, full support ;p

What’s game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics?

I highly suggest taking the time to read this. After you have read that, take the time to do some basic research on a proposal. Then get back to us.